Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Chand Miyan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

23 Sep 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:8508
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of an accused for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a child, affirming that credible child testimony supported by DNA evidence suffices for conviction under the POCSO Act despite absence of visible injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act penetrative sexual assault child witness testimony DNA evidence

Md. Murshid v. State NCT of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8509
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for anal rape of a minor under POCSO and IPC, relying on the victim's identification and corroborative medical and DNA evidence, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO sexual offence against child anal rape

Ajeet Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8483-DB

The Delhi High Court directed acceptance of offline applications without age restrictions as interim relief to maintain parity, leaving final eligibility to the Tribunal's decision.

administrative petition_dismissed interim relief age limit offline application Central Administrative Tribunal

Mohd Arif v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8520

The Delhi High Court set aside the MCD's closure notice against a bakery after accepting that a gas oven was used and directed compliance with health trade license conditions.

administrative appeal_allowed Closure Notice Municipal Corporation of Delhi Health Trade License Diesel Oven

Jagmohini v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8521

The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to provide the petitioner with relevant orders and stayed coercive action for three weeks to enable filing of an appeal before the ATMCD.

administrative petition_allowed Sealing Order Demolition Order Vacation Notice Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MWO Chandra Kishore Prasad

23 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8564-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its review to jurisdictional errors.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension armed forces Release Medical Board

Shivam Agarwal & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8497

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR

Sh Amit Kumar @ Golu and Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8500

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 380, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Satyawan Tanwar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8495

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC based on an amicable family settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Dr. K. Kannan v. The Registrar University of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8538
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi’s exclusion of a candidate from Assistant Professor recruitment for failing to meet prescribed academic eligibility and screening criteria, emphasizing judicial deference to employer’s academic evaluation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant academic qualifications Assistant Professor recruitment University of Delhi eligibility criteria

Pramod Kumar v. The State GNCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8505

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Daman Preet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8470

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380 and 411 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Vineet Kumar Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8476

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Naveen Kumar and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8478

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

M.R. Chanchal v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8479

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Bharat Sah v. The State of NCT of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8539-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition after the minor son was recovered, produced before the court, and expressed his free will to stay with his elder brother, requiring no further judicial intervention.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus minor recovery Section 164 Cr.P.C. Child Welfare Committee

Revacure Lifesciences LLP v. State Govt of NCT Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8558

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR against the petitioners for offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and IPC, holding that police lack jurisdiction under the D&C Act and no prima facie IPC offence was made out, with the FIR also barred by limitation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 32 D&C Act Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 274 IPC

Ranjan Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi

23 Sep 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:8543
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused found with commercial quantity of Heroin, emphasizing strict application of Section 37 NDPS Act and rejecting bail on procedural grounds and parity with co-accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity bail application

Prakash Chand Joshi v. Union of India and Ors

23 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8562-DB

The High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition on seniority re-fixation due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, granting liberty to file afresh.

administrative other writ petition refixation of seniority impleadment withdrawal of petition

Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Birendra Kumar Singh

23 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board