Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Sarika Talwar v. Siddharth Talwar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against the Family Court's orders refusing to set aside ex-parte divorce proceedings and restore dismissed applications due to non-prosecution and unexplained delay.
Uzbekistan Airways v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / Avato Ward 202 Zone 11
The Delhi High Court permitted Uzbekistan Airways to file a time-barred appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act against a tax demand order, directing the appellate authority to decide on merits and consider the challenge to related notifications in line with a lead constitutional matter.
Naresh Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of contested GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Naresh Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to provide a personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Diva Saxena v. School of Planning and Architecture & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective enforcement of stricter attendance rules during an ongoing semester is arbitrary, allowing the petitioner to attend classes and appear in examinations with remedial accommodations.
Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Limited v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH and Co. KG & Ors.
The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of it accordingly.
Jitender @ Kalla v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court permitted victim's family to intervene and seek recall of a furlough order granted to a life convict who misled the Court by suppressing material facts about his sentence conditions.
Jashvir Singh v. Union of India
The High Court directed the Medical Invalidation Board to provide the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before taking any decision, disposing of the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits.
Tahiliani Design Private Limited v. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals II, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte Order-in-Appeal due to procedural irregularity in hearing notices and allowed the petitioner a fresh hearing, pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of GST notification extending adjudication deadlines.
Transformative Learning Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax Delhi East & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a CGST order confirming tax demand and penalty for lack of reasoned consideration of foreign remittance proof, directing fresh adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing.
Treco Wire India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST order confirming demand and penalty for fraudulent ITC, holding that the limitation period for appeal had lapsed and principles of natural justice were complied with.
Smt Gopi Chhetri v. Union of India & Anr
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the relief sought had already been granted, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. Chatur Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing regularization of long-serving casual Monument Attendants, clarifying that continuous performance of essential duties for over ten years warrants regularization despite initial temporary status.
Shannu Baghel v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court struck down NHAI's recruitment criterion relying solely on CLAT (PG) scores for legal posts as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Prahalad & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that death during boarding/deboarding constitutes an untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, entitling compensation to the dependents despite alleged contributory negligence.
Parveen Kumar Bansal & Anr. v. Ashwani Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court restrained the MCD from executing a demolition order until the appeal pending before the non-functional Appellate Tribunal MCD is heard.
Ajit Singh & Ors. v. Kanta Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that delay in filing suit cannot be condoned under Section 5 Limitation Act and time spent before Revenue Authorities cannot be excluded under Section 14(2) as the proceedings were not prosecuted in good faith or related to the same matter in issue.
SMT SUMEDHA CHOPRA v. SHRI SHITAL KUMAR BHANDARI & ANR.
The court held that it can rectify its inadvertent procedural error and restore a suit under its inherent powers despite the expiry of limitation for review or appeal, ensuring no party suffers due to the court’s mistake.
Rohtas Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary proceedings against an Additional SHO for negligence in controlling illicit liquor sale, ruling that reliance on preliminary enquiry material is permissible if procedural safeguards are met.
Prabhu Dayal v. CP & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a police constable following a valid departmental enquiry for extortion, affirming limited judicial review and compliance with procedural requirements under Delhi Police Rules.