Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Pardeep Kumar v. Union of India and Anr.
The High Court dismissed a writ petition on jurisdictional grounds, directing the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal for service matters concerning civilian personnel in the Indian Navy.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex- Sgt Vimal Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that diseases manifesting during service are service attributable unless proven otherwise by the employer.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Raghubir Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by clear evidence.
Deepak Khanduja v. Pukhraj Gulecha and Company
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an appeal against an interim order after the main suit was decreed, holding the appeal infructuous.
Tata Play Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions under GST but remanded the matter for factual determination of profiteering by Tata Play Ltd.
Seven Seas Lights Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner, Shahdara Division CGST
The Delhi High Court held that uploading GST notices on the portal constitutes valid service and allowed the petitioner to file a belated appeal despite limitation, dismissing the writ petition for non-service.
Surender Kumar Wadhwa v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-18 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that both jurisdictional and faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment and that notices issued within the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act, 1961 are valid.
M/S EMPIRE FASTENERS v. THE ASSISTENT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that both Jurisdictional and Faceless Assessing Officers have concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, dismissing the petition challenging jurisdiction.
State v. Shiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a public servant in a corruption case, holding that proof of both demand and acceptance of bribe is essential for conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Sarita Khatri & Ors v. Govt. of NCTD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the government to convert long-serving temporary supervisors under the ICDS scheme into permanent employees, affirming that prolonged continuous service in regular posts mandates regularization despite initial temporary appointments.
Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of anti-profiteering provisions under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 and confirmed that GST rate reduction benefits must be passed on to consumers by commensurate price reduction, dismissing the petition challenging NAPA's order against the petitioner for profiteering.
Zeria Pharmaceutical Co Ltd v. The Controller of Patents
The Delhi High Court dismissed the patent appeal as infructuous due to the patent's expiration during the appeal, leaving substantive legal questions undecided.
Nihal Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of an ossification test application and directed a thorough age determination inquiry under the Juvenile Justice Act, emphasizing that medical tests are necessary when credible documentary evidence is absent or disputed.
Puja Jayant & Ors. v. Commissioner of Customs, IGI Airport
The Delhi High Court directed inquiry into alleged forgery of representations and mandated Customs to provide citizen-friendly facilities at the airport after disposal of petitioners' seized gold jewellery despite pending representations.
Inspector Sudhir Kumar and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the CAPF Assistant Commandant examination results due to unsubstantiated allegations of cheating and upheld the administrative discretion in roll number allocation.
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Maya Devi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation in a motor accident claim, ruling that a one-third deduction for personal expenses of an unmarried deceased with multiple dependents was justified under Supreme Court precedents.
Harsh Kumar Kaushik v. Rakesh Saroj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside costs imposed on the petitioner for challenging a photocopied and handwritten corrected affidavit, directing the respondent to file a fresh duly attested affidavit and cautioning parties against procedural laxity.
M/S Pillar Enterprises v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court set aside the permanent blacklisting of a licencee for violation of natural justice and directed adherence to due process and arbitration for contractual disputes.
Ashiana Ispat Limited v. Kamdhenu Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer and consolidation of related trademark infringement suits under Rule 26 of the IPR Division Rules and Section 24 CPC to avoid multiplicity and conflicting decisions, even though the petitioner was not a party to the suit sought to be transferred.
Krishan Dev Bharal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the SDM's refusal to de-seal a property under Section 146 CrPC, holding that such preventive orders remain in force until a competent civil court conclusively determines ownership or possession rights.