NTPC LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

UNKNOWN COURT · 24 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:8346
Neena Bansal Krishna
CRL.M.C. 5904/2025
2025:DHC:8346
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The court corrected a typographical error and directed the Trial Court to consider NCLT-granted immunity before deciding whether NTPC Ltd. should be arrayed as an accused, requiring a reasoned order.

Full Text
Translation output
(CORRIGENDUM)
IN CRL.M.C. 5904/2025 in case Titled “NTPC LTD. VS. DIECTORATE OF
ENFORCEMENT”
24.09.2025
The above mentioned Crl.M.C. was disposed of vide Order dated
17.09.2025. However, in para 23 of the Order, there is a typographical error in 3rd line of the Order to the effect that instead of the word “NCLT”, inadvertently, the word “NTPC” has been typed.
The para 23 of the Order dated 17.09.2025 in the aforesaid case be read as under:
“23. In view of this, the Petition is disposed of with the directions to NTPC to appear before the learned Trial Court and bring to its notice the aforesaid facts along with the Order of NCLT and the immunity granted there under. The learned Trial Court shall consider the submissions of the NTPC and pass appropriate Orders as it deems fit, especially clarifying whether NTPC is to be arrayed as an Accused. In case, no case is made out against NTPC, then speaking reasoned Order in this regard, be made by the learned Special Judge.” Necessary Corrigendum be uploaded.
(NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 24, 2025
JUDGMENT