Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

JSW Steel Ltd v. Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd.

23 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; H. L. Dattu

The Supreme Court dismissed multiple review petitions against its earlier order in Civil Appeal No. 7944 of 2010, holding that no sufficient grounds for review were made out.

civil petition_dismissed review petition Supreme Court error apparent on face of record extraordinary remedy

Union of India v. Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd.

23 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; H.L. Dattu

The Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's review petition challenging the interpretation of the MMDR Act in Sandur Manganese, affirming limited grounds for review and upholding the original judgment directing reconsideration of mining lease applications.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review petition Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 Section 11(2) MMDR Act

Sukhdev Singh v. Union of India and others

23 Apr 2013 · R.M. Lodha; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that every entry in a public servant's Annual Confidential Report must be communicated within a reasonable time, and non-communication violates natural justice and Article 14, affecting promotion and service benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Annual Confidential Report communication of ACR entries downgrading natural justice

Shakuntalabai & Anr. v. Nanaji Dewaji Wadaskar

22 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment for mischaracterizing the appeal and failing to consider submissions, remanding the matter for fresh hearing on merits.

civil appeal_allowed First Appeal Second Appeal High Court judgment sustainability

Kanhaiya Lal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

22 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld convictions and commuted death sentences to life imprisonment in a multiple murder case, holding that delay in FIR was justified, relatives' testimony was credible, and death penalty was not warranted under the 'rarest of rare' doctrine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in FIR interested witnesses unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC

AWADHESH KUMAR SHARMA v. U.P.S.R.T.C.

22 Apr 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court reinstated a bus conductor terminated for carrying passengers without tickets, allowing service continuity but denying back-wages, balancing employee circumstances and employer interests.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement termination back-wages Labour Court

Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. v. Ministry of Environment & Forest

18 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; K. S. Radhakrishnan; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld MOEF's rejection of forest clearance for bauxite mining in Niyamgiri Hills due to violations of tribal rights under the Forest Rights Act and environmental laws.

environmental petition_dismissed Significant Forest Rights Act, 2006 Forest Conservation Act, 1980 Environmental Protection Act, 1986 Stage-II forest clearance

Shivaji Keshvrao Bhoite v. State of Maharashtra

18 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court confirmed interim bail granted to the appellant in a criminal case, following the earlier bail granted to a co-accused, emphasizing parity and fairness in bail considerations.

criminal appeal_allowed interim bail charge-sheet co-accused parity in bail

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya v. State of Karnataka

18 Apr 2013 · Aftab Alam; K. S. Radhakrishnan; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld its constitutional jurisdiction to regulate illegal mining in Karnataka, endorsing the Central Empowered Committee's recommendations and directing implementation of environmental and rehabilitative measures to protect fundamental rights and natural resources.

environmental / constitutional / criminal petition_allowed Significant illegal mining Central Empowered Committee Article 32 Article 142

Rattiram & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh; Satyanarayan & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh

18 Apr 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with committal procedure under the SC/ST Act does not vitiate trial and upheld convictions of accused who shared the common object of assault under Section 149 IPC, while acquitting others due to insufficient evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object committal procedure

SASI v. STATE OF KERALA

18 Apr 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, holding that acquittal of co-accused negates independent conviction without separate evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Forest Act collective offence acquittal of co-accused independent evidence

Mariappan v. State of Tamil Nadu

18 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction, holding that the appellant failed to prove insanity at the time of the offence under Section 84 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 84 IPC insanity defence Paranoid Schizophrenia burden of proof

Hansa v. Deep Shankar Roy

18 Apr 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that unregistered letters of intent with conditions do not create enforceable sale agreements under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, and bonafide subsequent buyers without notice prevail over prior unregistered claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance letter of intent bonafide purchaser Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963

Sahib Hussain @ Sahib Jan v. State of Rajasthan

18 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M. Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for five murders based on circumstantial evidence and affirmed the commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment with a 20-year minimum imprisonment term without remission.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC death sentence commutation

U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD v. OM PRAKASH SHARMA

18 Apr 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a highest bidder in a public auction acquires no vested right without acceptance by the competent authority and dismissed the suit for lack of concluded contract and non-compliance with mandatory statutory notice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant public auction delegation of powers acceptance of bid statutory authority

S. Malla Reddy v. M/s. Future Builders Co-operative Housing Society

18 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that defendants cannot withdraw admissions made in an earlier written statement by filing a fresh or amended statement after trial commencement, and successive applications for the same relief constitute abuse of process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amendment of pleadings withdrawal of admission Order VI Rule 16 CPC Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Mashyak Grihnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. Usman Habib Dhuka

18 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal; Arjan Kumar Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a belated amendment to challenge a conveyance deed known at the time of suit filing can be refused if due diligence is not shown, restoring the trial court's dismissal of the amendment application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC due diligence belated amendment

Hazara Singh v. Raj Kumar

18 Apr 2013 · P. Sathasivam; M.Y. Eqbal; Arjan Kumar Sikri

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's sentence under Section 307 IPC, holding that the High Court erred in reducing the sentence based on irrelevant grounds such as trial delay and potential enmity revival.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC attempt to murder sentencing policy proportionate sentence

Jehal Tanti v. Nageshwar Singh

18 Apr 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; Sharad Arvind Bobde

The Supreme Court held that a sale deed executed in violation of a valid interim injunction is unlawful and remitted the second appeal for fresh consideration of substantial questions of law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction sale deed alienation validity of sale

Jatya Pal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Apr 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that VSNL/Tata Communications Limited is not a State or public authority under Article 12 and does not perform public functions, thus writ petitions challenging employee terminations are not maintainable.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India State definition Public function Writ jurisdiction