Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal

08 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition challenging reassessment orders under the Income Tax Act when an efficacious statutory remedy of appeal was available and not exhausted.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 writ jurisdiction

Harbhajan Kumar v. Collector Land Acquisition & Colonisation Department

08 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to enhance land acquisition compensation to Rs. 7,25,000 per acre, aligning it with its prior ruling in Ashrafi and Ors. vs. State of Haryana.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement Supreme Court Ashrafi judgment

The Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy & Others v. M.K. Bawane

07 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that re-employed government employees whose sterilization occurred prior to re-employment are not entitled to incentive increments under the government policy promoting small family norms, and set aside the High Court's contrary direction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant re-employment incentive increment sterilization operation government policy

Poona Timber Merchants and Saw Mill Owners Association v. State of Maharashtra

07 Aug 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that private negotiations do not constitute acquisition under the MRTP Act and that failure to acquire land within statutory time limits results in deemed lapsing of reservation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 126 Section 127 land acquisition

Jitendra Kumar Khan and others v. The Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Limited and others

07 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the allowance of an amendment pleading equitable set-off distinct from legal set-off, emphasizing the discretionary nature of equitable set-off arising from the same transaction or connected circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant equitable set-off legal set-off Order VIII Rule 6 CPC amendment of written statement

MGB GRAMIN BANK v. CHAKRAWARTI SINGH

07 Aug 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment is not a vested right and pending applications must be considered under the new scheme in force, setting aside the High Court's direction for appointment under the old scheme.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment vested right public employment scheme of compassionate appointment

Nihal Singh & Others v. State of Punjab & Others

07 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that Special Police Officers appointed under statutory authority have a master-servant relationship with the State and directed their regularization despite absence of sanctioned posts, distinguishing the case from irregular appointments in Umadevi.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Special Police Officer Section 17 Police Act 1861 regularization of service master-servant relationship

J & K Institute of Management Public Administration and Rural Development v. Renu Bala

07 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by rewriting Recruitment Rules and restored the quashing of a tainted selection, directing appointments strictly according to existing rules.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules Judicial review Selection process Undue favour

Bakhshish Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.

06 Aug 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld life convictions for murder and conspiracy, affirming that credible eyewitness identification and strong circumstantial evidence can establish guilt despite minor contradictions and physical absence of the conspirator.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder conspiracy eyewitness identification circumstantial evidence

Tara v. Basant and Co.

06 Aug 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that an amendment to a plaint cannot be refused merely because it ousts the trial court's pecuniary jurisdiction and directed expeditious disposal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 7 CPC pecuniary jurisdiction jurisdictional consequences

Sham Lal v. State of Punjab

06 Aug 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that arbitrary classification of constructions for exemption from land acquisition violates Article 14 and quashed the State Government's order modifying the Trust's resolution, directing exclusion of appellants' land except for the ring road.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 Section 72-E exemption from acquisition

Rajeswari by LRs v. The Official Assignee

05 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that the Official Assignee's report confirming possession and payment entitles the claimant to execution of the sale deed, overruling the High Court's reliance on a conflicting Advocate Commissioner report.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Official Assignee Insolvency Petition Presidency Towns Insolvent Act, 1909 Advocate Commissioner report

T. Gayatri Devi v. Tallepaneni Sreekanth

05 Aug 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of divorce proceedings to the wife's place of employment, holding that trial location causing professional hardship justifies transfer despite her financial independence.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce proceeding transfer of case family court forum convenience

The Financial Commissioner (Revenue) and Secretary, Punjab & Ors. v. Gurkirpal Singh

05 Aug 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that once possession of land is taken under Section 16 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the State cannot validly denotify the land under Section 48, dismissing the State's appeal.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 16 possession Section 48 denotification possession of land

Tek Ram v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad

05 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court remanded the income tax appeal to the High Court for fresh disposal after accepting new documents filed by the appellant that were not previously considered.

tax appeal_allowed Procedural Income Tax Appeal Remand New Documents Procedural Fairness

Orissa Power Transmission Corporation Limited v. Asian School of Business Management Trust

05 Aug 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a transmission scheme validly notified under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 cannot be challenged by a landowner who purchased land post-notification without objections, and set aside the High Court's order directing re-alignment of transmission lines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 transmission scheme Section 28 Section 29

Dharmendra Kirthal v. State of U.P. and another

02 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, ruling that prioritizing trials before Special Courts does not violate fundamental rights to speedy and fair trial or equality under the Constitution.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Section 12 constitutional validity Article 21

Sachin Pawar & Anr v. State of U.P. & Ors

02 Aug 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court quashed a kidnapping complaint and set aside protective conditions imposed by the High Court in a case involving a voluntary inter-religious marriage between consenting adults.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant voluntary marriage inter-religious marriage kidnapping complaint Section 161 Cr.P.C.

Ramchandra v. Regional Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

02 Aug 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that compensation to an employee injured due to driver’s negligence is not limited to Workmen’s Compensation Act amounts and directed the insurer to pay full compensation unless the policy excludes higher liability due to non-payment of additional premium.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 insurance liability employee injury

S. Periammal v. Inspector of Police

02 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's condition requiring a Rs. 20 lakh deposit for anticipatory bail, holding that such a monetary condition improperly converts a criminal proceeding into a recovery proceeding.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail monetary condition Section 420 IPC Section 120-B IPC