Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

State of Uttaranchal and another v. Sri Shiv Charan Singh Bhandari and others

23 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that claims for retrospective promotion benefits must be made within a reasonable time and dismissed the respondents' stale claim based on delay and laches despite a junior employee's earlier ad hoc promotion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant delay and laches promotion seniority ad hoc promotion

SUNDER v. STATE OF U.P.

23 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order for proceeding without amicus curiae representation and remanded the criminal appeal for fresh hearing ensuring effective representation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant amicus curiae right to representation criminal appeal Section 395 IPC

Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Raju

22 Aug 2013 · P. SATHASIVAM; RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI; RANJAN GOGOI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that third parties have no right to participate in criminal prosecutions but allowed a public interest petition challenging the Juvenile Justice Act's provisions relating to trial of juveniles accused of heinous offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice third party intervention locus standi criminal prosecution

M/s Young Achievers v. IMS Learning Resources Pvt. Ltd.

22 Aug 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in an earlier contract does not survive when the contract is superseded by a subsequent agreement without an arbitration clause, dismissing the appellant's plea for arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration clause supersession novation mutual termination

Basawaraj & Anr. v. The Spl. Land Acquisition Officer

22 Aug 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a five-year delay in filing appeals under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and rejecting conditional condonation of delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54 appeal condonation of delay sufficient cause

Mohamed Israfil v. Raufunessa Bibi

22 Aug 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court censured an Advocate-on-Record for misconduct in lending signatures without appearing in Court, underscoring the duty of AORs to personally conduct cases and maintain professional ethics.

administrative other Significant Advocate-on-Record Supreme Court Rules, 1966 Misconduct Conduct unbecoming

Gopal Krishan Mittal v. M/S. Bombay Motors

22 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court allowed the landlord's appeal, granting tenants five years to vacate premises occupied for five decades, restoring lower authority orders and setting conditions on rent and subletting.

civil appeal_allowed tenancy vacant possession rent payment subletting

Raja @ Sasikumar v. State through Inspector of Police

22 Aug 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC, holding that minor contradictions in eyewitness evidence do not vitiate a credible prosecution case corroborated by earliest complaint and contemporaneous documents.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness evidence contradictions in evidence

Land Acquisition Collector, Mohali v. Surinder Kaur

22 Aug 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that compensation awards under the Land Acquisition Act cannot be challenged in execution proceedings and must be appealed within the statutory period, dismissing the appellants' claim regarding land measurement.

property appeal_dismissed Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation award marla measurement Section 47 CPC

GM, Sri Siddeshwara Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Sri Ikbal

22 Aug 2013 · R.M. Lodha; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court held that procedural non-compliance under Rule 9 of the SARFAESI Rules can be waived by written consent and that statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction, setting aside the High Court’s quashing of the sale certificate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Security Interest Enforcement Rule 9 Written Agreement

Popat Bahiru Govardhane v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

22 Aug 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, starts from the date of the court's award, not from the date of knowledge, and dismissed the appeal challenging rejection on limitation grounds.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28A Limitation period Redetermination of compensation

Vinay Kumar v. Gurdeep Singh & Ors.

22 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's second amendment application to correct the agreement date in a suit for specific performance, holding it was not barred by res judicata and must be decided at trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint specific performance declaration doctrine of res judicata

Fiona Shrikhande v. State of Maharashtra and Another

22 Aug 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that at the complaint stage, a Magistrate may take cognizance under Section 504 IPC if a prima facie case of intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace is made out, even without verbatim reproduction of insulting words.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 504 IPC Section 202 CrPC intentional insult prima facie case

Manjeet Singh Khera v. State of Maharashtra

21 Aug 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution is not obliged to produce a preliminary complaint or disclose the informant's identity if it is not part of the police report or relied upon in trial, dismissing the accused's plea for such disclosure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant complaint disclosure Anti Corruption Bureau Prevention of Corruption Act Section 173 CrPC

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava

21 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that seniority must be fixed from the date of substantive promotion order as per service rules and retrospective seniority from the date of vacancy is not permissible absent express rule provision.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant seniority fixation retrospective seniority promotion service rules

Sunita Jugalkishore Gilda v. Ramanlal Udhoji Tanna

21 Aug 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a mortgagor cannot induct a tenant in mortgaged property during pendency of mortgage litigation to the prejudice of the mortgagee under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, and set aside lower courts' rulings allowing such tenancy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mortgage mortgagor mortgagee Section 52 Transfer of Property Act

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. C.P. Goswami

21 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the illegal termination finding and reinstatement order but modified the award of full back wages to a lump sum compensation, balancing employee rights and employer interests.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination of service industrial tribunal reinstatement back wages

Prof. K.V. Rajendran v. Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai & Ors.

21 Aug 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking transfer of investigation to the CBI, holding that such transfer is an extraordinary power to be exercised only in rare cases where the State investigation is tainted or biased, which was not shown here.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant transfer of investigation CBI State police Section 173 Cr.P.C.

Indraj Singh v. State of Haryana

19 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a heavy one-third deduction from market value for land compensation in a developed area is unjustified and reduced it to 10%, enhancing the compensation payable under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value deduction

S. Govidaraju v. State of Karnataka

19 Aug 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death and cruelty, affirming that appellate courts may reverse acquittals if trial court findings are perverse and the accused fails to explain incriminating circumstances.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act