Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Raghu @ Raghavendra v. State of Karnataka

18 Jul 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the criminal appeal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural criminal appeal withdrawal of appeal permission to withdraw dismissal as withdrawn

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Assn v. Union of India

17 Jul 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court directed the DGT&CP Haryana to take custody of disputed plots, finalize claimant lists, ensure development, and stay related proceedings to resolve the Okhla Enclave plot allotment dispute.

property other Significant Director General Town & Country Planning Haryana plot allotment custodianship consolidated claimant list

Satya Pal Anand v. Punjabi Housing Co-operative Society

17 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the validity of a compromise and subsequent sale of cooperative society property, refusing to appoint a receiver where possession was with bona fide parties and compensation was accepted.

civil appeal_dismissed Compromise Deed Extinguishment Deed Appointment of Receiver Cooperative Societies Act

Rajendra Sharma v. State of West Bengal

17 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for dacoity but reduced his sentence considering his limited role and time already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dacoity Section 395 IPC Section 397 IPC Arms Act

Arshad Hussain v. State of Rajasthan

17 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's murder conviction due to doubts in the prosecution case arising from the acquittal of co-accused and inconsistencies in evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC benefit of doubt private defence alibi

Nagappan v. State by Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu

17 Jul 2013 · P. Sathasivam; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction of the appellant due to lack of medical evidence supporting his specific role despite eye-witness testimony, emphasizing the need for corroboration in criminal cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC interested witnesses medical evidence

Subhash Popatlal Dave v. Union of India & Anr.

16 Jul 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Gyan Sudha Misra; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that preventive detention orders under COFEPOSA can be challenged on grounds beyond the five exceptions in Alka Subhash Gadia, and stale detention orders lacking a live link to ongoing activities must be quashed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention COFEPOSA Act, 1974 detention order pre-execution challenge

Arathi Bandi v. Bandi Jagadrakshaka Rao

16 Jul 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's order directing the mother to submit the child to U.S. court jurisdiction, emphasizing respect for foreign custody orders and denying relief where the child was wrongfully removed from the foreign court's jurisdiction.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody habeas corpus foreign custody orders comity of courts

Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation v. Salimbhai Umarbhai Mansuri

16 Jul 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

Termination of employment on expiry of a fixed-term contract does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus Sections 25G and 25H protections do not apply.

labor appeal_allowed Significant retrenchment Industrial Disputes Act, 1948 fixed-term contract Section 2(oo)

State of Kerala & Ors. v. R. Sudha & Ors.

16 Jul 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Kerala High Court to continue monitoring the State's compliance with environmental protection directives regarding sewage and waste disposal.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant environmental protection sewage treatment waste disposal Article 48A

M/s. Integrated Finance Co. Ltd. v. Reserve Bank of India

16 Jul 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that RBI Act's Chapter IIIB provisions override the Companies Act, disallowing sanction of a scheme compromising NBFC depositors' rights inconsistent with mandatory RBI regulations.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Non-Banking Financial Company Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Section 45QA Companies Act, 1956

M/s. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. v. Ram Parshotam Mittal

16 Jul 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that a High Court may extend interim relief for a limited period upon permitting withdrawal of an appeal after hearing on merits, and observations made during withdrawal do not bind subsequent proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant withdrawal of appeal interim relief functus officio Article 226

State of Maharashtra v. Indian Hotel & Restaurants Assn.

16 Jul 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 33A and 33B of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, validating the prohibition of dance performances in certain establishments as a reasonable restriction under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) to protect public morality and dignity of women.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Bombay Police Act, 1951 Sections 33A and 33B Article 14 Article 19(1)(g)

Dilip Sudhakar Pendse v. Central Bureau of Investigation

16 Jul 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that when offences are not exclusively triable by the Sessions Court and the Magistrate taking cognizance is not the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the case must be tried by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and cannot be committed to the Sessions Court under Section 306 of the Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 CrPC Tender of pardon Committal to Court of Sessions Jurisdiction of Magistrate

Lazer v. State of Tamil Nadu

15 Jul 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that life imprisonment means imprisonment for the convict’s natural life, but remission can be granted by the State Government under Section 432 CrPC, and directed the petitioner to seek remission accordingly.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant life imprisonment Section 302 IPC remission of sentence Section 432 CrPC

Bhagwati Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Peerless General Finance & Investment Company Ltd

15 Jul 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that unlisted shares of a public limited company are securities under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, and a delayed payment contract is not a spot delivery contract, rendering the share transfer illegal under Sections 13 and 16 of the Act.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 unlisted shares public limited company marketable securities

Rohit Chauhan v. Surinder Singh & Ors.

15 Jul 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that property allotted to a sole coparcener on partition remains his separate property until the birth of a son, after which it revives as coparcenary property, restricting alienation rights without legal necessity.

property appeal_allowed Significant coparcenary property partition alienation Hindu Succession Act

HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPN. LTD. v. CANBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

15 Jul 2013 · CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD; V. GOPALA GOWDA

The Supreme Court dismissed HSBC's appeal, holding it liable to refund the amount paid by Canbank for undelivered securities as it failed to prove the payment was on behalf of a third party.

civil appeal_dismissed pay order securities transaction burden of proof separate legal entity

M/s. TVC Skyshop Ltd v. M/s. Reliance Communication and Infrastructure Ltd

15 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld an ex parte summary decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that mere non-appearance without special circumstances and failure to apply for leave to defend do not justify setting aside the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit ex parte decree leave to defend

Sondur Gopal v. Sondur Rajini

15 Jul 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the Hindu Marriage Act applies only to Hindus domiciled in India, and dismissed the husband's appeal, affirming the Family Court's jurisdiction over the wife's petition for judicial separation and custody.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 domicile jurisdiction judicial separation