Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

State of Uttarakhand v. Vinit Traders and Investment Ltd.

26 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court remitted the dispute over classification and valuation of a property deed for stamp duty to the Collector for fresh determination after examining all relevant documents, including prior deeds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant stamp duty lease deed sale deed valuation

Jandel Singh v. State of M.P.

26 Jul 2013 · H.L. Dattu; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and directed immediate release of the appellant who had already undergone the sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment awarded under Section 376 IPC by the High Court.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 376 IPC rape sentence reduction rigorous imprisonment

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai v. Kohinoor CTNL Infrastructure Company Private Limited

25 Jul 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; H. L. Gokhale

The Supreme Court upheld that substantial construction under valid permissions cannot be curtailed retrospectively by amended building regulations, while emphasizing the need for sustainable urban planning addressing recreational space, traffic, and fire safety.

administrative settled Significant Development Control Regulations Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai stop work notice building height restriction

State of U.P. & Ors. v. Pankaj Kumar Vishnoi

25 Jul 2013 · Dipak Misra; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment to a higher post like Sub-Inspector requires meeting prescribed physical fitness standards and cannot be claimed as a right after failing the physical test.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment physical fitness test Recruitment of Dependants Rules 1974 minimum standards of work and efficiency

Kantilal Martaji Pandor v. State of Gujarat

25 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of cruelty under Section 498A IPC, holding that the deceased's letter could not be used as proof absent the cause of death being in question after acquittal under Section 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC cruelty abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC

Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar v. State of Maharashtra

25 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen theory, confession, and recovery of blood-stained clothes and body.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory extra-judicial confession recovery of blood-stained clothes

Union of India & Ors. v. Rajesh Kumar Gond

25 Jul 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld the principle of equal pay for equal work, dismissing appeals against orders granting pay parity to government translators across departments in the absence of functional differences.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work Junior Hindi Translator Central Secretariat Official Language Service pay parity

Kailash v. State of M.P.

24 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape under Section 376(1) IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite some delay in reporting, dismissing the appellant's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed rape sexual assault Section 376 IPC eyewitness testimony

Anuj Kumar Gupta @ Sethi Gupta v. State of Bihar

24 Jul 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and admissible portions of the accused's confessional statement leading to recovery of the dead body, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant confessional statement Section 25 Evidence Act Section 27 Evidence Act circumstantial evidence

C.KESHAVAMURTHY v. H.K.ABDUL ZABBAR

23 Jul 2013 · H.L. GOKHALE; J. CHELAMESWAR

The Supreme Court held that once cheque dishonour is established, the accused must rebut the presumption of debt under Section 139, and a prior notice not to clear earlier cheques does not justify dishonour of subsequently issued cheques.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque bouncing Presumption of debt

State of Bihar v. Sudhir Chandra Kumar

23 Jul 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court upheld that University employees are entitled to pension benefits arising from State Government resolutions merging Dearness Allowance into basic pay, as per University statute, despite financial implications for the State.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pension calculation Dearness Allowance merger University employees State Government resolution

Akkode Jumayath Palli Paripalana Committee v. P.V. Ibrahim Haji

23 Jul 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the Wakf Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain suits for injunction relating to management and peaceful enjoyment of wakf properties, distinguishing eviction suits which lie before civil courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wakf Tribunal jurisdiction injunction suit wakf property management civil court jurisdiction exclusion

Kaliya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

23 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based on a duly recorded dying declaration supported by secondary evidence and medical testimony despite the absence of the original document.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration secondary evidence Section 302 IPC Indian Evidence Act Sections 63 and 65

Gian Chand & Ors. v. State of Haryana

23 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under the NDPS Act, holding that statutory presumptions of conscious possession apply and police evidence is reliable even without independent witnesses, dismissing the appellants' challenge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant conscious possession NDPS Act statutory presumption Section 313 CrPC

Sardar Milkha Singh v. Union of India

22 Jul 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that only the Administrator of a Union Territory can validly issue land acquisition notifications under the Land Acquisition Act, and that failure to properly consider objections vitiates the acquisition, quashing the impugned notifications.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Article 239 Constitution Union Territory Administrator Section 5A objections

Md. Iqbal & Anr. v. State of Jharkhand

22 Jul 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for gang rape based on the credible sole testimony of the prosecutrix and medical evidence, applying the presumption of absence of consent under Section 114-A of the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant gang rape Section 376(2)(g) IPC presumption of absence of consent sole testimony of prosecutrix

Bhagubhai Vitthalbhai Patel v. Union of India

22 Jul 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to produce documents filed before the original authority and dated prior to 14.7.2009 in eviction appeal proceedings, setting aside the rejection orders of the High Court and appellate authority to that extent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 eviction proceedings appellate evidence production of documents

Ketankumar Gopalbhai Tandel v. State of Gujarat

18 Jul 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that persons below 18 years at the time of offence, even before the 2000 Juvenile Justice Act commenced, must be treated as juveniles and benefit from its provisions, leading to modification of sentence though conviction was upheld.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice retrospective application juvenile status Juvenile Justice Act 1986

Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Vijaybhai N. Chandrani

18 Jul 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that an assessee must exhaust statutory remedies by replying to Show Cause Notices under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act before approaching the High Court, setting aside the High Court's premature quashing of such notices.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153C Show Cause Notice Writ Petition

Sant Longowal Instt. of Engg. & Tech. & Anr v. Suresh Chandra Verma

18 Jul 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that in absence of explicit bond terms, the institute cannot recover the entire salary paid during study leave for non-completion of Ph.D, allowing partial recovery already made but denying further recovery.

civil appeal_allowed Significant study leave bond conditions Ph.D completion refund of salary