Supreme Court of India

17,275 judgments

Year:

Ashvinbhai Jayantilal Modi v. Ramkaran Ramchandra Sharma & Anr.

18 Jun 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by realistically assessing future income of a deceased medical student, applying Sarla Verma multiplier based on parents' age, and setting aside contributory negligence attributed to the deceased.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future income loss of dependency

Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.K. Kunhiraman

09 May 2013 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the interim status quo in a Cooperative Society membership dispute and directed the High Court to expeditiously dispose of the related writ petition without being influenced by prior observations.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural Cooperative Society enrollment of members expulsion of members status quo

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Arikala Narasa Reddy v. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari

20 Jul 2012 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that election disputes must be confined to pleaded issues, invalidated certain disputed votes for identification marks, resulting in a tie resolved by draw of lots, thereby declaring the appellant elected.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant election petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 ballot paper validity secrecy of ballot

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. U. DINAKAR

30 May 2012 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a competent authority can lawfully rectify a mistaken pay scale in an appointment letter after due opportunity, rejecting the claim to a higher Central pay scale when appointed by direct recruitment on a State pay scale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale correction appointment letter mistake direct recruitment Central pay scale

Ramesh Chand v. Suresh Chand

09 Apr 2012 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, and Will do not confer title without a registered sale deed and proper proof, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession and protecting the bona fide purchaser's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 Section 53A Agreement to Sell

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mahendra Alias Golu

08 Oct 2011 · Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 35

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's acts went beyond mere preparation and constituted an attempt to commit rape under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 IPC, restoring his conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

Jayaswamy v. State of Karnataka

12 Aug 2011 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; L. Nageswara Rao
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for causing grievous hurt but set aside his murder conviction, emphasizing that appellate courts should not disturb acquittals without substantial and compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate interference common intention grievous hurt

M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. v. M/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD.

21 Jul 2011 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1059
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the Jogighopa Act are not governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act, and in absence of prescribed limitation, appeals must be filed within reasonable time, allowing the delayed appeal filed by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 116 Jogighopa Act, 1990 Commissioner of Payments

M/S. AJAR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SATYANARAYAN SOMANI

03 Jun 2011 · JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR; DR D Y CHANDRACHUD

The Supreme Court held that renewal of a public lease is discretionary and must be exercised in public interest with transparency, setting aside a flawed lease renewal and conversion to freehold by UDA in favor of a private developer.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal public land Ujjain Development Authority leasehold rights

Smt Sulekha Rani v. Union of India

28 Mar 2011 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that discharge of an army personnel on medical grounds without an Invalidation Medical Board is illegal and directed grant of family pension treating service as continuing until death.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Invalidation Medical Board Army Rules 1954 medical discharge family pension

Delhi Development Authority v. Prithi Pal Singh

24 Dec 2010 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that actual physical possession is required under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act to deny de-notification and used its constitutional power under Article 142 to settle a decades-old land dispute by allocating part of the land to DDA and the remainder to the respondent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 48 Physical possession De-notification

Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan v. State of West Bengal

09 Dec 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of ganja but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and the law as it stood at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 ganja possession conscious possession

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sakru Mahagu Binjewar

14 Jul 2010 · Arun Mishra; Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai; Surya Kant
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for brutal murders but commuted death sentences to life imprisonment with a minimum 25-year term, reaffirming the 'rarest of rare' doctrine and sentencing principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death penalty rarest of rare life imprisonment commutation of sentence

P. Daivasigamani v. S. Sambandan

15 Jun 2010 · Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance of a sale agreement, holding that the plaintiff had proved readiness and willingness within limitation and that time was not the essence of the contract for immovable property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness limitation Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act

Abhishek Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

31 May 2010 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 924
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC due to unreliable dying declarations and insufficient corroborative evidence, emphasizing strict scrutiny of multiple dying declarations and procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC multiple dying declarations reliability of evidence

Achhar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

27 May 2010 · Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose · 2021 INSC 289
Cites 10 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder and grievous hurt, holding that appellate interference with trial acquittal is justified when the trial Court's judgment is perverse and overlooks consistent, corroborated evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 378 CrPC Acquittal Perverse judgment Eyewitness testimony

Achhar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

27 May 2010 · Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 10 · Cited by 13

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder and grievous hurt, affirming that appellate courts may interfere with trial acquittals when based on perverse findings and that exaggerations in witness testimony do not vitiate core truthful evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal conviction Section 378 CrPC presumption of innocence

Surinder Singh v. State (Union Territory of Chandigarh)

19 May 2010 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC but acquitted him of misuse of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, reducing his sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 27 Arms Act attempt to murder intention to kill