Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Advocates Association, Bangalore v. Union of India & Ors

27 Aug 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court directed CBI investigation into the 2012 Bangalore court complex violence, emphasizing exceptional circumstances warranting transfer due to SIT's failure to commence inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Special Investigation Team Central Bureau of Investigation Article 226 CBI investigation

Baldev Krishan v. Satya Narain

27 Aug 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that subsequent events including the death of a landlord's family member can be considered in eviction suits, but if bonafide need is pleaded for the landlord and family collectively, the claim survives, allowing the appeal with conditions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction bonafide need Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 death of landlord

Ramachandra Narayan Nayak v. Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd.

27 Aug 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that the department’s failure to supply cement as per contract constituted breach, rendering the rescission and penalties illegal, and restored the trial court’s decree in favor of the contractor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contract breach rescission of contract supply of materials penalty and forfeiture

M/S. ISWARYA ASSOCIATES v. THE BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE & ANR.

27 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a parking fee collection license granted by an unauthorized officer, affirming that only the Standing Committee under Section 348 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 can grant such licenses.

administrative appeal_dismissed Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Section 348 license for parking fee collection authority of Standing Committee

Union of India and Ors. v. Shri Bhanwar Lal Mundan

27 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that erroneous pay fixation based on deputation pay cannot be protected on repatriation and pension must be fixed on correct pay, but recovery of excess payment is waived in absence of employee fault.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation deputation pension fixation repatriation

Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

27 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a belatedly exercised and accepted option for the C.P.F. Scheme precludes an employee from claiming pension benefits under a deeming provision treating failure to opt as acceptance of the Pension Scheme.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Scheme Option exercise Deeming fiction

Nagpur Ceramic Pvt. Ltd. v. Chandrika S/O Nandilal Vishwakarama

27 Aug 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide defence and deposit of claimed amount negate admission of a Company Petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, setting aside the appellate Court's order admitting the petition.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 433(e) Companies Act 1956 Company Petition moonshine defence capacity to pay debts

Shimbhu and Anr v. State of Haryana

27 Aug 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the statutory minimum ten-year sentence for gang rape, rejecting reduction based on victim's compromise or passage of time, emphasizing strict adherence to sentencing provisions under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant gang rape Section 376(2)(g) IPC minimum sentence compromise

Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited

26 Aug 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a 12-year-old child with permanent disability from a motor accident, emphasizing non-pecuniary damages over pecuniary loss formulas for child victims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation child disability non-pecuniary damages loss of amenities

Pepsu Road Transport Corporation v. National Insurance Company

26 Aug 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that an insurer is liable to indemnify the insured unless it proves wilful breach of policy conditions by the insured in employing a driver with a fake licence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 149(2)(a)(ii) insurance liability fake driving licence

Kamlesh Prabhudas Tanna & Another v. State of Gujarat

26 Aug 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court remitted the criminal appeal for fresh disposal, emphasizing the appellate court's duty to independently reappraise evidence and provide clear reasons before upholding conviction in dowry death and related offences.

criminal other Significant appellate court duty reappraisal of evidence dowry death Section 304B IPC

ECON ANTRI LTD. v. ROM INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.

26 Aug 2013 · P. SATHASIVAM; RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI; RANJAN GOGOI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court affirmed that the limitation period under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be computed by excluding the date on which the cause of action arose, overruling contrary precedent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 142(b) Limitation period

Sowmithri S v. State of Assam

26 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that the Armed Forces authorities have the exclusive jurisdiction to decide whether to try a service member by Court Martial or civil court, and quashed the criminal prosecution in favor of military inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Court Martial Jurisdiction Armed Forces Section 302 IPC

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jalandhar v. M/s. Kay Kay Industries

26 Aug 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that a manufacturer of final products is entitled to deemed MODVAT credit if inputs are received under invoices declaring payment of appropriate excise duty, requiring only reasonable care and not independent verification of duty payment by the supplier.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant MODVAT credit Central Excise Rules 1944 Rule 57A(6) Notification No. 58/97-CE

Kishan Gopal v. Lala

26 Aug 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation with interest to the parents of a child who died due to rash and negligent driving, setting aside the Tribunal and High Court's erroneous dismissal of the claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation rash and negligent driving notional income

Prem Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

26 Aug 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court reduced the fine imposed under Section 324 IPC on a poor labourer from Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 10,000, emphasizing consideration of the accused's financial capacity in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 324 IPC fine reduction financial status poor labourer

Chairman, Bihar School Exam.Board v. Sanjay Kumar

23 Aug 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing the declaration of examination results for students from an unrecognised college, holding such declaration impermissible.

civil appeal_allowed unrecognised college examination results Bihar School Examination Board High Court direction

GOA COASTAL ZONE MG. AUTH. v. RUDRESH NAIK

23 Aug 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal against the Tribunal's order but deleted the imposed costs and granted additional time for compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed civil appeal costs Tribunal order compliance

Union of India v. G.R. Rama Krishna

23 Aug 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that only regular service counts for promotion eligibility under statutory recruitment rules, setting aside a High Court order appointing an ad-hoc employee contrary to such rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant ad-hoc service regular service promotion eligibility recruitment rules

State of Orissa v. Khaga @ Khageswar Naik & Ors.

23 Aug 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court held that the killing was murder under Section 302 IPC as Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC did not apply, restoring the trial court's conviction and setting aside the High Court's reduction to culpable homicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC murder