Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Kollam Chandra Sekhar v. Kollam Padma Latha

17 Sep 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision denying divorce on grounds of schizophrenia, emphasizing that treatable mental illness does not justify dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(iii) divorce unsoundness of mind

M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand

16 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the terms of reference in an industrial dispute must accurately reflect the real dispute and quashed defective references that pre-judged issues, directing fresh reference to be made.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1) terms of reference industrial dispute

State of Rajasthan & Anr v. Bal Kishan Mathur

16 Sep 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal and condoned a six-day delay in filing a special appeal, emphasizing a liberal approach to condonation to ensure adjudication on merits over technical dismissal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation eviction Rajasthan Public Premises Act

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. v. Babu Lal Jangir

16 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the compulsory retirement of an employee, ruling that the entire service record including old adverse entries is relevant for such decisions and the 'washed off theory' does not apply to compulsory retirement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant compulsory retirement washed off theory adverse entries service record

GOVT. OF KARNATAKA AND ANR v. K.C. SUBRAMANYA AND ORS

16 Sep 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court dismissed the Government of Karnataka's appeal seeking to adduce additional evidence at the appellate stage and upheld the decree confirming possession in favor of private respondents, emphasizing due diligence requirements under Order XLI Rule 27(1)(aa) CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XLI Rule 27(1)(aa) CPC additional evidence due diligence concurrent findings of fact

Gurudwara Sahib v. Gram Panchayat Village Sirthala

16 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that adverse possession is only a defense and a suit for declaration of ownership based on adverse possession is not maintainable, while upholding the appellant's right to injunction protecting possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession declaration of ownership injunction maintainability of suit

RAGHVENDRA KUMAR v. PRABAL KUMAR

16 Sep 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that conviction under Section 307 IPC involves moral turpitude disqualifying a candidate from elections, and suspension of sentence or bail does not amount to acquittal, thus upholding cancellation of nomination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC moral turpitude election nomination disqualification

A.S.V. Narayanan Rao v. Ratnamala

13 Sep 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that criminal prosecution of a doctor under Section 304A IPC requires gross negligence, and quashed proceedings against a cardiologist where such gross negligence was not established.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal negligence Section 304A IPC medical negligence gross negligence

State of Andhra Pradesh v. Md. Hussain @ Saleem

13 Sep 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that appeals against bail orders under the NIA Act must be heard by a Division Bench of the High Court, and original bail applications must be filed before the Special Court, not the High Court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 Section 21 bail application Special Court

Sumit Mehta v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

13 Sep 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that imposing a condition to deposit a large fixed deposit as a prerequisite for anticipatory bail is unreasonable and violative of personal liberty, setting aside such condition while upholding bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC personal liberty Article 21

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER v. M/S PAREKH ENTERPRISES

13 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, penalty can be imposed on the owner of goods, reversing the High Court's order and restoring the penalty imposed by the Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 78(5) Rajasthan Sales Tax Act penalty on owner of goods person in-charge of goods tax penalty liability

Dr. P.B. Desai v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

13 Sep 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a surgeon under Section 338 read with Section 109 IPC for rash and negligent acts and omissions endangering a patient's life, affirming that omissions can constitute 'acts' under the IPC when a legal duty exists.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 338 IPC criminal negligence doctor-patient relationship legal duty of care

Ravindra @ Bala Jagariath Patil and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

13 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot frame charges under Section 120-B IPC if such charges were not framed by the trial court, and accordingly allowed the appeal setting aside the High Court's order.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 120-B IPC framing of charges criminal revision High Court powers

H.P. Scheduled Tribes Employees Federation v. Himachal Pradesh S.V.K.K.

13 Sep 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court directed the State of Himachal Pradesh to implement its reservation policy in promotions for SC/ST employees within three months based on collected data, rejecting delay due to pending constitutional amendments.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation in promotion Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Article 16(4)

A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra

13 Sep 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Power of Attorney holder with personal knowledge can file and verify complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on behalf of the payee, clarifying procedural requirements and resolving conflicting High Court views.

criminal other Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 142(a) Power of Attorney

Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy

13 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order condoning a 2449-day delay in filing an appeal against an interim order, emphasizing strict scrutiny of inordinate delay and negligence in condonation applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Indian Limitation Act interim order writ petition

Manjit Singh v. State of Punjab

13 Sep 2013 · Dipak Misra; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of Manjit Singh and Paramjit Singh for murder and attempted murder under Sections 302 and 307 IPC read with Section 34, affirming that reliable evidence and inferred common intention suffice for conviction despite non-examination of some witnesses and acquittal of co-accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Bhasha Construction & Industrial Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Shining Vyapar Pvt. Ltd.

13 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by permitting withdrawal of the winding up petition following amicable settlement and directed expeditious disposal of related civil proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed winding up petition amicable settlement deposit of disputed amount withdrawal of petition

Standard Chartered Bank v. Dharminder Bhohi

13 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by granting liberty to the auction purchaser to sue the bank, emphasized the need for speedy disposal of recovery proceedings under SARFAESI and RDB Acts, and set aside that part of the order while allowing the appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act Debt Recovery Tribunal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Resurgence India v. Election Commission of India

13 Sep 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that nomination papers accompanied by affidavits with blank particulars can be rejected by Returning Officers to uphold voters' fundamental right to know candidate information under Article 19(1)(a).

constitutional petition_allowed Significant affidavit completeness nomination paper rejection Representation of the People Act, 1951 Section 36 RP Act