Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Dr. Nawal Kishore Verma and another v. The State of Bihar and others

12 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that diploma holders in Homeopathic Medicine covered by a Government notification equating their qualification to a degree are entitled to the same pay scale as degree holders and directed the State and local bodies to extend such benefits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale revision Homeopathic doctors diploma equivalence Government notification

Soma Suresh Kumar v. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

12 Sep 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors Act, affirming the State's competence to legislate to protect depositors from fraudulent financial establishments despite overlapping central banking laws.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors Act constitutional validity State legislative competence banking regulation

State of U.P. v. M/s Lakshmi Sugar & Oil Mills Ltd.

12 Sep 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that land not held or occupied for cultivation but for industrial purposes connected to a sugar factory vests in the State Corporation under the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, and concurrent factual findings to that effect cannot be disturbed by the High Court in writ jurisdiction.

property appeal_allowed Significant U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 scheduled undertaking land acquisition agricultural land

Manohar Lal Sharma v. M.C.I.

12 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Council of India's rejection of renewal permission for a medical college's MBBS admissions due to serious deficiencies found in a surprise inspection, affirming MCI's administrative powers and the non-applicability of strict natural justice rules in such matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Medical Council of India renewal of permission medical college inspection surprise inspection

JAINA WINES PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

11 Sep 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing wine manufacturers exempted from excise duty to deposit any excise duty collected as part of MRP, emphasizing prevention of unjust enrichment and procedural safeguards for manufacturers.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant excise duty exemption Maximum Retail Price unjust enrichment

Dr. Kulmeet Kaur Mahal v. State of Punjab

11 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the High Court's order allowing RMOs to compete for vacant seats with weightage, holding that completed admissions should not be disturbed as appellants' rights were not adversely affected.

administrative appeal_dismissed Medical admissions Reservation In-service candidates Review petition

Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. v. Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority

11 Sep 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that failure to submit the latest Income Tax Return was a non-essential breach not warranting disqualification of the tender bid and set aside the High Court's rejection of the appellant's bid.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender conditions essential terms collateral terms judicial review

Hill Properties Ltd. v. Union Bank of India

11 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that a shareholder's right in a company-owned flat is transferable and mortgageable, and such property can be attached and sold in execution proceedings despite restrictive Articles of Association.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mortgage of flat shareholder rights Articles of Association transferability of property

Shanmugam v. State

11 Sep 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on reliable testimony of a related witness and rejected the appellants' contention of delay in FIR and lesser offence under Section 304 Part II IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in FIR interested witness related witness murder

Pandhari Vithal Chame v. Maharashtra Indsl. Dev. Corpn. Th. R. Mngr & Anr

10 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing partial release of enhanced compensation without security and balance upon furnishing security, overruling the High Court's interim order.

civil appeal_allowed enhanced compensation interim relief security release of compensation

Sunil Damodar Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra

10 Sep 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court commuted the appellant's death sentence to life imprisonment after applying the 'rarest of rare' doctrine and considering mitigating socio-economic factors, while upholding the conviction for murder and attempt to murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of rare mitigating circumstances life imprisonment

Kashinath Basappa Janapure v. M.I.D.Corpn. Thr.Reg.Manager & Anr.

10 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal directing release of 50% of enhanced compensation without security and the balance upon furnishing security, modifying the High Court's orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant enhanced compensation release of compensation security Collector

Londhe Prakash Bhagwan v. Dattatraya Eknath Mane

10 Sep 2013 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; K. S. Radhakrishnan
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that appeals under Section 9(1)(b) of the MEPS Act must be filed within a reasonable time and dismissed a nearly 10-year delayed appeal as barred by inordinate delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation period condonation of delay appeal under MEPS Act inordinate delay

Wajidmiya Abdul Raheman Shaikh v. Maharashtra Ind. Dev. Cor.

10 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed appeals directing release of 50% of enhanced compensation without security and balance on furnishing security, overruling the High Court's interim orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant enhanced compensation interim relief security for compensation release of compensation

MSR Leathers v. S. Palaniappan & Anr.

10 Sep 2013 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; K. S. Radhakrishnan

The Supreme Court held that prosecution based on second or successive dishonour of a cheque is permissible under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overruling earlier precedent that limited prosecution to the first dishonour.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Cheque dishonour Limitation period

Moumita Kar Nee Halder v. Subrata Kar

10 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal by consent, directing withdrawal of all pending cases and ordering financial settlements between the divorced parties to amicably end matrimonial litigation.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13B divorce by mutual consent amicable settlement

Lafarge Aggregates & Concrete India P.Ld v. Sukarsh Azad & Anr

10 Sep 2013 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a Section 138 complaint after the drawer offered payment with compensation, dismissed the appeal for delay and merit, and directed payment to the complainant, emphasizing the Act's objective to ensure payment over penal prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Stop payment instructions Quashing of complaint

Amit Pandey v. State of Bihar

09 Sep 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for four accused charged with murder under Section 302 IPC, holding that bail was not justified given the specific overt acts attributed to them in the charge-sheet.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC murder charge-sheet

State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Namdeo

09 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that freedom fighter pension claims require a liberal approach but must comply with scheme documentary requirements unless impossibility is shown, and the High Court erred in granting pension solely on affidavits ignoring these requirements.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Freedom Fighters Pension Scheme standard of proof principle of probability judicial review

Bhanwar Lal & Anr. v. Rajasthan Board of Muslim Wakf & Ors.

09 Sep 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction over suits concerning Wakf property instituted before the Rajasthan Wakf Act, 1995, and that the Wakf Tribunal's jurisdiction is limited to specific disputes enumerated in the Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Wakf property jurisdiction Rajasthan Wakf Act 1995 civil court