Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Vinodkumar M. Malavia v. Maganlal Mangaldas Gameti

30 Sep 2013 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Surinder Singh Nijjar

The Supreme Court held that the unification of churches without statutory compliance under the Societies Registration Act and Bombay Public Trusts Act is invalid, affirming that trust dissolution and property vesting must follow prescribed legal procedures despite religious freedom claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 Societies Registration Act, 1860 unification of churches religious trust dissolution

Gudda @ Dwarikendra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

30 Sep 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; M. Y. Eqbal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for triple murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, holding the case did not meet the 'rarest of the rare' threshold for capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder death sentence rarest of the rare

Maruti Raghunath Kadam v. Chellaram Jethanand Madhrani & Ors.

30 Sep 2013 · H.L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that obstructionist proceedings arising from eviction decree execution lie within the jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes, overturning the High Court's contrary view.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Court of Small Causes obstructionist proceedings eviction decree jurisdiction

Ranjit Singh v. State of M.P.

27 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside an illegally granted bail order based on misconstruction of a High Court direction, emphasizing proper judicial discretion and adherence to statutory bail principles.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 439 CrPC

Tamil Nadu Rural Development Engineers Association v. The Secretary to Government Rural Development Department

27 Sep 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of service rules and promotion ratios in the Tamil Nadu Rural Development Department, rejecting claims by absorbed Overseers to count past service for promotion and mandating a fixed 1:1 promotion ratio.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant promotion ratio absorption Assistant Engineer Assistant Executive Engineer

Poongodi v. Thangavel

27 Sep 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that the proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC limits only enforcement by imprisonment and does not bar recovery of maintenance arrears beyond one year, allowing the appellants to claim full arrears from the date of filing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 125 CrPC maintenance arrears mode of enforcement imprisonment

State of Rajasthan v. Jamil Khan

27 Sep 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld life imprisonment in a brutal child rape-murder case, emphasizing the rarest of rare doctrine, restricting remission of minimum sentences, and declining to reinstate the death penalty after delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death penalty rarest of rare rape and murder child victim

People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India

27 Sep 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that voters' right not to vote must be protected with secrecy and directed the Election Commission to provide a NOTA option in electronic voting machines and ballot papers.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant secrecy of voting right not to vote None of the Above (NOTA) Representation of the People Act, 1951

Kamlesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

26 Sep 2013 · Madan B. Lokur
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful transfer of FERA prosecution from Magistrate to Special Judge, holding no exclusive jurisdiction vested in Magistrates and no prejudice to petitioners' appellate rights.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant FERA FEMA transfer of prosecution jurisdiction

M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited v. State of Karnataka

26 Sep 2013 · R. M. Lodha; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld that agreements between developers and flat purchasers constitute works contracts liable to sales tax on the goods involved, affirming the constitutional validity of related tax provisions and the binding precedent in Raheja Development.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant works contract sales tax Article 366(29-A)(b) Karnataka Sales Tax Act

GANESHLAL v. SHYAM

26 Sep 2013 · H. L. Gokhale; J. Chelameswar

The Supreme Court held that sale of a plot of land is not a service under the Consumer Protection Act and thus outside consumer forum jurisdiction, but dismissed the appeal as possession was already delivered.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 sale of land deficiency in service jurisdiction of consumer forums

Sushila Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

24 Sep 2013 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Surinder Singh Nijjar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that its monitoring of an investigation ends upon filing of the charge-sheet and commencement of trial, leaving further proceedings to the competent trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant monitoring of investigation charge-sheet Section 173(8) CrPC continuing mandamus

Davalsab Husainsab Mulla v. North West Karnataka Road Transport Corporation

24 Sep 2013 · T. S. Thakur; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for serious misconduct, affirming the Labour Court's judicious exercise of discretion under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act and rejecting leniency despite long service.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act Section 11A domestic enquiry disciplinary action dismissal

Yash Deep Trexim Private Limited v. Namokar Vinimay Pvt. Ltd.

23 Sep 2013 · P. SATHASIVAM; RANJAN GOGOI

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the applicability of SICA to a foreign company, holding that the company no longer qualifies as sick and leaving management disputes to appropriate forums.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies Act BIFR jurisdiction sick industrial company definition foreign company registration

Ranjana Kumari v. State of Uttaranchal

23 Sep 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court referred for larger Bench consideration the question whether a Scheduled Caste member by birth in one State can claim reservation benefits in another State after migration or marriage.

constitutional other Significant Scheduled Caste Reservation Articles 341 and 342 State-specific Scheduled Caste status

Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. Bajrangi Rabidas

23 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an employee who misrepresented his date of birth to secure employment is estopped from later correcting it, and equitable relief under Article 226 will not be granted to allow such alteration.

labor appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction estoppel equitable jurisdiction Article 226

Delta Distilleries Limited v. United Spirits Limited

23 Sep 2013 · A.K. Patnaik; H.L. Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the power of the Arbitral Tribunal and courts under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to compel production of relevant documents, rejecting confidentiality claims under tax laws and dismissing the appellant's challenge.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 27 Arbitration and Conciliation Act court assistance in arbitration production of documents confidentiality of tax records

BHEEMRAYA v. SUNEETHA

23 Sep 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla

The Supreme Court held that a marriage between minors is void under the Hindu Marriage Act and emphasized courts' duty to promote reconciliation rather than encourage criminal prosecution in matrimonial disputes.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 minor marriage void marriage Section 5(iii) HMA

State of Rajasthan v. A.N. Mathur & Ors.

23 Sep 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the University’s change to a Pension Scheme without the Chancellor’s assent was invalid, upheld the State’s rejection of the change, and restored the original Provident Fund Scheme for employee retiral benefits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Agricultural University Act 2000 Section 39 assent of Chancellor Pension Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Scheme

Baldev Singh v. State of Punjab

20 Sep 2013 · A. K. Patnaik; Gyan Sudha Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for abduction but set aside murder convictions against police officers due to lack of evidence that abducted persons were killed, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt and proper application of evidentiary burdens.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction murder delay in FIR Section 161 CrPC statements