Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Omprakash v. Laxminarayan & Ors.

07 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Kurian Joseph
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an agreement to sell immovable property transferring possession is a conveyance requiring proper stamp duty, and an insufficiently stamped agreement is inadmissible in evidence regardless of parties' pleadings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement to sell conveyance Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 35

Gulam Sarbar v. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

07 Oct 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC, affirming that credible eyewitness and circumstantial evidence sufficiently proved their involvement in a criminal conspiracy.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy Section 302 IPC Section 120-B IPC murder

ONGC Ltd. v. M/s. Modern Construction and Co.

07 Oct 2013 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that a suit returned by a court lacking jurisdiction and refiled in the competent court is a fresh suit, entitling the plaintiff to interest only from the date of refiling, not from the original institution date.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC Section 14 Limitation Act territorial jurisdiction return of plaint

HARSHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

07 Oct 2013 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that tenant's entitlement to occupant registration under Section 45 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act depends on personal cultivation of agricultural land on the appointed day, and remanded the case for fresh consideration accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 Section 45 tenant occupant registration

G.L. Batra v. State of Haryana

07 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the State Government cannot withdraw a personal relaxation in remuneration granted to a constitutional appointee, and a coordinate Bench cannot overrule a judgment affirmed by another without a larger Bench, thereby restoring the appellant's pay and benefits.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant constitutional appointee remuneration Haryana Public Service Commission Article 316 Constitution Article 14 discrimination

SOMDEV KAPOOR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

07 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that liquor license applications are governed by the Rules prevailing at the time of grant, not at the time of original application, and upheld the refusal to renew a license granted in violation of proximity restrictions under amended West Bengal Excise Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant liquor license West Bengal Excise Rules Rule 8 proximity restriction

Panchanan Mandal @ Pachan Mandal & Anr. v. State of Jharkhand

04 Oct 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Section 304B IPC due to failure to prove dowry-related cruelty and infirmities in the dying declaration evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC dying declaration medical fitness

Ajahar Ali v. State of West Bengal

04 Oct 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 354 IPC for outraging a woman's modesty, rejected the appellant's plea of juvenility and probation, and dismissed the appeal affirming the sentence of six months' imprisonment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 354 IPC outraging modesty juvenile justice Probation of Offenders Act

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. G. Sarvothaman

04 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the Chief Commissioner under the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, cannot direct inclusion of posts not identified by government policy for reservation or grant promotion benefits under the physically handicapped quota.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 59 physically handicapped reservation promotion

Deputy Commissioner, KVS & Ors. v. J. Hussain

04 Oct 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld removal from service of an employee found drunk and forcibly entering the Principal's office during duty hours, holding the penalty not shockingly disproportionate and affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary penalty proportionality doctrine judicial review Article 14

Kulja Industries Limited v. Chief Gen. Manager W.T. Proj. BSNL

04 Oct 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that while BSNL can blacklist a supplier for fraud, permanent blacklisting without objective guidelines is disproportionate and remitted the matter to BSNL to determine the blacklisting period fairly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant blacklisting supplier debarment natural justice proportionality

Sanobanu Nazirbhai Mirza & Ors. v. Ahmedabad Municipal Transport Service

03 Oct 2013 · G.S. Singhvi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for the deceased's legal heirs in a motor accident claim by properly assessing notional income, future prospects, and additional heads of loss, setting aside the High Court's reduction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Compensation Notional income

M. Mansoor v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

03 Oct 2013 · G. S. Singhvi; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that for a bachelor deceased aged 24, a 50% deduction for personal expenses and a multiplier of 18 must be applied in motor accident compensation claims where parents are claimants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation personal expenses deduction multiplier bachelor deceased

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. v. Virendra Lal

03 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a disciplinary punishment imposed by a higher authority without preserving the statutory right of appeal under service regulations is invalid, and upheld the setting aside of pension deduction imposed on a retired Assistant Engineer by the U.P. State Electricity Board.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary authority pension deduction right of appeal service regulations

Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Regulatory Commission v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board

03 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the High Court retained jurisdiction to hear appeals pending under the repealed Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998, and that the Commission had power to issue directions ancillary to tariff fixation, but set aside the penalty imposed for non-compliance due to substantial compliance by the Board.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 Electricity Act, 2003 jurisdiction of High Court vesting of right of appeal

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh

01 Oct 2013 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings involving cheating and forgery in banking transactions cannot be quashed merely on the basis of settlement, emphasizing the public interest and directing trial to proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences cheating

Anil Kumar v. M.K. Aiyappa

01 Oct 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a valid prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is mandatory before a Magistrate or Special Judge can order investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against a public servant, and quashed the investigation order made without such sanction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 19 Prevention of Corruption Act sanction for prosecution public servant protection

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar v. Madheshwar Dhari Singh

01 Oct 2013 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the Central Government's classification in retirement age guidelines post-Bihar reorganisation was arbitrary, entitling affected employees to continue service till 60 years with adjusted salary and pension benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 age of superannuation state cadre allocation arbitrariness

Selvi J. Jayalalithaa v. State of Karnataka

30 Sep 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; S. A. Bobde
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed the mala fide removal of the Special Public Prosecutor to protect the petitioners' right to a speedy and fair trial, directing proper administrative consideration for concluding the trial.

criminal petition_allowed Significant speedy trial fair trial Special Public Prosecutor mala fide removal

Girraj Prasad Meena v. State of Rajasthan

30 Sep 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; S.A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside a summary conviction based on a guilty plea due to procedural irregularities and remanded the case for a fair trial following proper legal procedure.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant guilty plea probation of offenders Section 482 CrPC Section 164 CrPC statement