Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Vijay Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

18 Feb 2014 · T. S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to incomplete circumstantial evidence and unreliable recovery and identification of stolen property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence identification proceedings recovery of stolen property credibility of witnesses

Union of India v. M/S PAM Development Pvt. Ltd.

18 Feb 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that a party participating in arbitration without timely jurisdictional objections waives such rights, upholding the arbitral award and dismissing the appeal against the arbitrator's appointment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 16 Section 4

Bhaskar Lal Sharma v. Monica

18 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that allegations of mental cruelty and unlawful retention of property suffice to sustain a prima facie case under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, dismissing the appellants' plea to quash the complaint and directing expeditious trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC mental cruelty quashing of complaint

State of Sikkim and Others v. Adup Tshering Bhutia and Others

18 Feb 2014 · H. L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective amendment fixing seniority based on entry-level appointment date in the integrated Sikkim Police Force, validating retrospective promotions to remedy historical inequalities in promotion opportunities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant integration of services seniority fixation retrospective promotion Article 309 Constitution of India

Hari Nandan Prasad v. Employer I/R to Mangmt.of FCI

17 Feb 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination of daily wage workers does not automatically entitle reinstatement, but Industrial Tribunals may order regularization as affirmative action consistent with Article 14, allowing partial relief to one appellant while denying reinstatement to the other.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act Section 25-F illegal termination daily wage workers

V. K. Verma v. CBI

14 Feb 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's sentence for criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to long trial delay, advanced age, and health, while enhancing the fine and maintaining conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Section 5(2) Section 161 IPC minimum sentence

Voltas Limited v. Rolta India Limited

14 Feb 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a counter claim in arbitration is barred by limitation unless crystallized and notified earlier, restricting the respondent's counter claim to the amount specified in the prior notice and allowing the appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration counter claim limitation Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Birju v. State of M.P.

14 Feb 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction but commuted the death sentence to 20 years rigorous imprisonment, holding that the case did not meet the "rarest of rare" criteria for capital punishment.

criminal sentence_modified Significant rarest of rare death penalty Section 302 IPC criminal antecedents

Siemens Aktiengeselischaft & S. Ltd. v. DMRC Ltd.

14 Feb 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the award of a Delhi Metro contract to Hyundai Rotem, ruling that the tender evaluation process was fair, transparent, and legally valid, and rejected the appellant's challenge to the achievability of energy consumption values.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review tender evaluation contract award Guaranteed Energy Consumption (GEC)

Gajanan Kamlya Patil v. Addl. Collector & Comp. Auth. & Ors.

14 Feb 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that without lawful and actual possession taken before repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, the State cannot claim possession, and quashed possession notices issued post-repeal.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act vesting possession de jure possession

Enercon (India) Ltd. & Ors. v. Enercon GMBH & Anr.

14 Feb 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the IPLA contains a valid arbitration agreement with London as the seat of arbitration, dismissed challenges to its validity, and upheld the concurrent jurisdiction of English courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement IPLA seat of arbitration venue of arbitration

Bastiram v. State of Rajasthan

13 Feb 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC, holding that reliable ocular evidence can prevail over medical evidence and that common intention was established.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant ocular evidence medical evidence dying declaration common intention

G. Dhanasekar v. M.D., Metropolitan Transport Corporation Limited

12 Feb 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation for functional disability must reflect the injury's impact on the victim's profession and restored the finding that the bus driver's negligence caused the accident, awarding the appellant just compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant functional disability motor accident compensation contributory negligence assessment of damages

Renu & Ors. v. District & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari & Anr.

12 Feb 2014 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that judicial staff appointments must comply with Articles 14 and 16 through transparent, advertised, and rule-based procedures, invalidating irregular appointments and directing reforms for centralized and regular recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Articles 14 and 16 public employment judicial appointments Chief Justice administrative powers

Union of India & Ors. v. S.P. Verma

11 Feb 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of an employee's dismissal for unauthorized occupation of premises pending eviction appeal, allowing disciplinary proceedings only after final disposal of the eviction appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant dismissal unauthorized occupation Indian Railways Public Premises Eviction Act

Vijayander Kumar & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

11 Feb 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s refusal to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC, holding that allegations disclosing a cognizable offence cannot be dismissed merely because a civil remedy exists.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 420 IPC Section 120-B IPC cheating

M.D. ORISSA S.H.W COOP. STY. LTD. v. SATYANARAYAN PATTNAIK & ANR.

11 Feb 2014 · ANIL R. DAVE; DIPAK MISRA

The Supreme Court held that an employee's withdrawal of a voluntary retirement application before final acceptance must be considered, and wrongful retirement warrants reinstatement with proportionate back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme withdrawal of retirement application reinstatement back wages

State Bank of India & Ors. v. Surya Narain Tripathi

11 Feb 2014 · H.L. Gokhale; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that compassionate appointment is intended only to alleviate sudden financial hardship and cannot be granted if adequate financial provision has been made to the deceased employee's family, allowing the Bank's appeal and dismissing the writ petition.

employment appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment financial hardship Article 16 employment rights

Dr. Purshotam Kumar Kaundal v. State of H.P. and Others

11 Feb 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that a post graduate medical degree from a recognized university qualifies for promotion eligibility under Himachal Pradesh Medical Education Service Rules without mandatory MCI recognition.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant promotion eligibility post graduate degree Medical Council of India recognition Himachal Pradesh Medical Education Service Rules, 1999

M/s Engineer Builder & Associates v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · A. K. Patnaik; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that the thirty-day limitation period for setting aside an arbitral award under the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration Act, 1945 is mandatory and not extendable by condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award limitation period Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration Act, 1945 condonation of delay