Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Karan Singh & Anr. v. State of Haryana

15 Apr 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that absence of specific dowry demand precludes conviction under Section 304-B IPC but upheld conviction under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide due to continuous harassment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304-B IPC Section 306 IPC dowry death abetment of suicide

Ashok Rai v. State of U.P.

15 Apr 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Ashok Rai for murder, holding that credible eyewitness testimony by a pardanashin lady can sustain conviction without corroboration and that appellate courts may overturn acquittals only on compelling grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant order of acquittal eyewitness evidence pardanashin lady motive

Licil Antony v. State of Kerala & Anr.

15 Apr 2014 · Chandramauli Kr. Prasad; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld a COFEPOSA detention order, ruling that explained delay in passing and serving the order does not vitiate it, and bail conditions from another jurisdiction need not be considered by the detaining authority.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant COFEPOSA preventive detention delay in detention order prejudicial activity

Dharam Deo Yadav v. State of U.P.

11 Apr 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on circumstantial and DNA evidence but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment due to lack of evidence on the manner of commission, emphasizing the admissibility of confession under custodial surveillance and the reliability of forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Evidence Act DNA evidence rarest of rare doctrine

Madhukar v. State of Maharashtra

11 Apr 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that earlier government service interrupted by resignation can be counted for pension under Rule 48(3) and Government Resolution 11.3.1992, setting aside the High Court's dismissal and directing pension refixation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pension computation resignation forfeiture of service Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982

Senthilkumar v. State of Tamil Nadu

11 Apr 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjana Prakash Desai; Ranjan Gogoi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of one appellant based on a voluntary and corroborated confessional statement under TADA, while acquitting the other due to insufficient evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act confessional statement Section 15 TADA retracted confession

Mahinder Dutt Sharma v. Union of India & others

11 Apr 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court clarified the criteria for granting compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Pension Rules, distinguishing it from dismissal legitimacy, and remanded the appellant's claim for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate allowance Rule 41 Central Civil Services Pension Rules 1972 dismissal from service unauthorized absence

Annapurna v. Mallikarjun & Anr.

11 Apr 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that failure to deposit the requisite amount within 60 days under Article 127 of the Limitation Act bars an application to set aside a court sale under Order XXI Rule 89 CPC, and remand by the High Court was erroneous.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 89 CPC court sale setting aside sale Limitation Act 1963

State of Rajasthan v. Manoj Kumar; State of Rajasthan v. Raju @ Raj Kumar & Anr.

11 Apr 2014 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the reduction of conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on exceeding right of private defence and rejected the applicability of common intention under Section 34 IPC for accomplices.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant right of private defence Section 304 Part I IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Union of India v. Nallam Shiva

11 Apr 2014 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of an Air Force personnel for overstaying leave without intimation, rejecting the Tribunal's order of reinstatement and modifying dismissal to discharge simplicitor on humanitarian grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Air Force Act, 1950 District Court Martial overstaying casual leave disciplinary authority

Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

10 Apr 2014 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1051

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant mother-in-law of dowry harassment charges under Section 498-A IPC due to lack of credible evidence proving cruelty or dowry demand leading to the daughter-in-law's suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC dowry harassment cruelty suicide

Nathu Ram Ramesh Kumar v. Commr. of Delhi Value Added Tax

09 Apr 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld assessments and penalties based on estimated sales from surprise visits, affirming that proper notice and opportunity were given and that the appellant failed to maintain correct books of accounts.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 Section 23(3) assessment penalty

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, MIHONA v. RAMNATH

09 Apr 2014 · SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA; V. GOPALA GOWDA

The Supreme Court held that a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction against a municipal council is not maintainable without prior statutory notice under Section 319 of the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 M.P. Municipalities Act Notice requirement Declaration of title Permanent injunction

Muralidhar @ Gidda & Anr. v. State of Karnataka

09 Apr 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal, holding that the High Court erred in convicting appellants solely on a dubious dying declaration without sufficient corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration appeal against acquittal presumption of innocence appellate court powers

Jacky v. Tiny @ Antony

09 Apr 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot quash a plaint under Articles 226 and 227 in a landlord-tenant civil dispute absent jurisdictional error, restoring the suit proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Articles 226 and 227 writ jurisdiction quashing plaint landlord-tenant dispute

Sudesh Dogra v. Union of India

07 Apr 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State's Commission of Inquiry and ex-gratia compensation scheme for victims of violence in Jammu & Kashmir, directing timely inquiry completion and proper investigation, while dismissing delayed claims for enhanced relief.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Jammu & Kashmir Commission of Inquiry ex-gratia compensation Article 14

M/s. Indus Airways Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. M/s. Magnum Aviation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

07 Apr 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that dishonour of post-dated cheques issued as advance payment for cancelled purchase orders does not constitute an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to absence of legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act post-dated cheque advance payment legally enforceable debt

Gopakumar B. Nair v. C.B.I. & Anr.

07 Apr 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana · 2014 (3) SCALE 137

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings against a public servant accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that settlement between parties does not automatically warrant quashing of serious non-compoundable offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences Prevention of Corruption Act

Haryana State Coop. Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. v. M/s. Jayam Textiles & Anr.

07 Apr 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to permit the appellant-Federation to produce authorization documents and proceed with the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant locus standi power of attorney Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act

Purnya Kala Devi v. State of Assam

07 Apr 2014 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the State Government is liable to pay compensation for an accident caused by a vehicle under its requisition, overruling the High Court's decision absolving the State.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Assam Requisition and Control of Vehicles Act, 1968 owner liability motor vehicle accident compensation