Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Electrosteel Steel Limited v. Ispat Carrier Private Limited

21 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 525
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that claims not included in an approved insolvency resolution plan stand extinguished, rendering subsequent arbitral awards on such claims null and non-executable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution plan Operational creditors Arbitral award

Vinod Boob v. Dodballaur Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

21 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 522

The Supreme Court disposed of a Special Leave Petition challenging acquittal under Section 138 NI Act by accepting a fair consensual settlement without affecting pending arbitration.

criminal other Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonor of cheque consensual settlement Special Leave Petition

Larsen and Toubro Limited v. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd.

21 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2025 INSC 523
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot partially modify arbitral awards under Section 34, upheld that the Development Agreement was binding as the Supplementary Agreement was vitiated by economic duress, and affirmed L&T’s fundamental breach justifying termination by PCL.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Development Agreement

Arunkumar H Shah HUF v. Avon Arcade Premises Co-operative Society Limited & Ors.

21 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 524

The Supreme Court upheld the competent authority's order granting deemed conveyance of the entire plot to flat purchasers' society subject to a perpetual lease protecting the appellant's rights, clarifying the limited scope of MOFA proceedings and registration officers' powers.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Section 11 deemed conveyance competent authority powers perpetual lease

Sachin v. State of Maharashtra

21 Apr 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 716

The Supreme Court held that in an appeal filed by the accused against conviction and sentence, the appellate court cannot enhance the sentence, and the High Court erred in enhancing the sentence without a State appeal and proper hearing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act enhancement of sentence appeal by accused revisional jurisdiction

MANJUNATH TIRAKAPPA MALAGI AND ANR v. GURUSIDDAPPA TIRAKAPPA MALAGI

21 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 517
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a compromise decree is binding and cannot be challenged by a fresh suit, dismissing the appellants' claim to nullify a family partition compromise decree on grounds of fraud and non-party status.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compromise decree consent decree Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Order 23 Rule 3A CPC

B.S YEDDIYURAPPA v. A ALAM PASHA

21 Apr 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; MANOJ MISRA · 2025 INSC 515

The Supreme Court refrained from deciding the applicability of sanction provisions under the Prevention of Corruption Act pending a larger bench ruling on whether a Magistrate takes cognizance while directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, and accordingly tagged the present petitions with the larger bench matter.

criminal other Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17A PC Act Section 19 PC Act Section 156(3) CrPC

N. Eswaranathan v. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police

17 Apr 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 509

The Supreme Court dismissed a second Special Leave Petition filed after dismissal of the first, held the Advocate-on-Record and assisting advocate guilty of professional misconduct and contempt for misleading the Court, and imposed disciplinary sanctions while accepting their unconditional apology.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Advocate-on-Record misuse of process of law contempt of court professional misconduct

ADAVYA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S VISHAL STRUCTURALS PVT. LTD.

17 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 507
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-service of Section 21 notice and non-joinder under Section 11 do not bar impleading parties who are bound by the arbitration agreement, affirming the arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction under Section 16 to decide such issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 21 notice Section 11 application Section 16 jurisdiction

D.B. Ravikumar v. G.S. Suresh

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 514
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that an FIR disclosing cognizable offences cannot be quashed merely because the accused holds an official position, and directed that the investigation must proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR quashing cognizable offence premature quashing official position

Ayyub Ali v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 568

The Supreme Court held that charges for murder under Section 302 IPC must be framed when the evidence discloses a prima facie case, setting aside the trial court's framing of charges only under Section 304 IPC in an honour killing case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC prima facie case

ANKIT MISHRA v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

17 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 501

The Supreme Court upheld anticipatory bail granted to a habitual offender for non-heinous offences triable by Judicial Magistrate, emphasizing careful judicial discretion and conditions for bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail habitual offender cancellation of bail Section 438 CrPC

Subhash Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi

17 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 499
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of a father for shooting his son, ruling that absence of motive does not preclude conviction when circumstantial evidence forms a complete chain proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence motive gunshot residue firearm injury

Sheela Devi & Anr v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd & Anr

17 Apr 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 516

The Supreme Court held that the statutory penalty for delayed compensation under Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees' Compensation Act is payable solely by the employer, modified the penalty to 30% of the compensation amount, and upheld the insurer's liability for compensation and interest but not the penalty.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(b) statutory penalty employer liability

DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE v. RAJ KUMAR ARORA & ORS

17 Apr 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 498

The Supreme Court held that dealing with psychotropic substances listed in the NDPS Act Schedule constitutes an offence under Section 8(c) regardless of their inclusion in Schedule I of the NDPS Rules, applying the ruling in Sanjeev V. Deshpande retrospectively and disallowing charge alteration under Section 216 CrPC after framing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Buprenorphine Hydrochloride psychotropic substances Schedule I NDPS Rules

Ajay Raj Shetty v. Director and Anr.

17 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 500

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the Appellant as Principal Employer under the Employees’ State Insurance Act for failure to deposit deducted employee contributions, affirming criminal liability despite the Company’s sick status.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 85(a) Principal Employer General Manager

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shamsher Singh

17 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 503
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction under Section 307 IPC for attempt to murder by holding that firing a firearm causing grievous injuries with knowledge of its lethality satisfies the requisite intention or knowledge to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Intention to cause death Grievous hurt

Lakhani Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. The State of Maharashra & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 489
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld MHADA's jurisdiction to redevelop freehold land jointly with residents and societies, dismissing the appellants' writ petition challenging the e-tender based on unregistered agreements.

property appeal_dismissed Significant MHADA Development Control and Promotion Regulations 2034 freehold land redevelopment unregistered agreements

K. Shikha Barman v. State of Madhya Pradesh

16 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 497

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of the prosecution to prove her identity as the accused named in seizure and arrest documents under the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identity of accused Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 313 CrPC burden of proof

State of Karnataka v. Nagesh

16 Apr 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 492

The Supreme Court reinstated the conviction of a public servant for accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that minor discrepancies in witness testimony do not vitiate a well-established prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 P.C. Act Section 13(1)(d) P.C. Act Section 13(2) P.C. Act