Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

R. Nagaraj v. Rajmani

09 Apr 2025 · R. Mahadevan; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 478

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in remanding a second appeal for fresh trial on limitation without deciding the substantial question of law, restoring the dismissal of a suit barred by limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Second appeal Substantial question of law

NEHA ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX

09 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 476

The Supreme Court held that input tax credit cannot be claimed on sales turnover exempt under section 7(c) of the Uttar Pradesh VAT Act, 2008, as prohibited by section 13(7), dismissing the dealer’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant input tax credit Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 section 7(c) section 13(7)

EPC Constructions India Limited Through Its Liquidator - Abhijit Guhathakurta v. M/s Matix Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited

09 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1259

The Supreme Court held that holders of cumulative redeemable preference shares are shareholders and not financial creditors under the IBC, and thus cannot initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares financial debt financial creditor Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Neha Chandrakant Shroff & Anr v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

08 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 484

The Supreme Court allowed the writ petition directing the State to return possession of two flats occupied since 1940 without written requisition, emphasizing the discretionary exercise of writ jurisdiction to prevent injustice despite alternative remedies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction possession requisition

CELESTIUM FINANCIAL v. A. GNANASEKARAN

08 Apr 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 804
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a complainant in a cheque bounce case is a victim entitled to appeal against acquittal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC without seeking special leave under Section 378.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 372 CrPC Section 378 CrPC victim rights

State of Karnataka v. Sri Channakeshava H.D.

08 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 471
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary enquiry before registration of FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act is desirable but not mandatory if a detailed source report exists, and quashing of FIR for absence of such enquiry was unwarranted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Preliminary enquiry Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Disproportionate assets Section 13(1)(b)

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. GOPU & ANR.

08 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 511
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that legal disability provisions under the Limitation Act do not extend to appeals, and a delayed appeal filed by minors after attaining majority without due diligence is not maintainable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act 1963 Section 6 Limitation Act Section 7 Limitation Act appeal limitation

The State of Tamil Nadu v. The Governor of Tamil Nadu & Anr.

08 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 481
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Governor must grant assent to Bills repassed by the State Legislature under Article 200 and act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, invalidating simpliciter withholding of assent and reservation of Bills for the President after reconsideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 200 Constitution Governor's assent to Bills Pocket veto Judicial review of Governor's discretion

Annaya Kocha Shetty v. Laxmibai Narayan Satose

08 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 466

The Supreme Court held that an agreement for conducting a hotel business did not create a leave and license tenancy under the Bombay Rent Act, dismissing the appellant's claim to deemed tenancy rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant leave and license agreement deemed tenant Bombay Rent Act agreement for conducting business

Karan Singh v. State of Haryana

08 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 475

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and ordered the release of a life convict who had undergone additional imprisonment under the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners Act, holding that the amendment prescribing minimum sentence was not retrospective and further detention was unnecessary.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners Act Temporary Release Remission

Sakshi Arha v. Rajasthan High Court

08 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 463
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a cut-off date for reserved category certificate issuance as the last date of application receipt, dismissing appeals of candidates whose certificates were issued later without requisite affidavits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant OBC-NCL certificate validity reservation eligibility cut-off date Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules 2010 certificate issuance date

M/S. CHATHA SERVICE STATION v. LALMATI DEVI & ORS

08 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 468

The Supreme Court held that absence of the required licence endorsement for driving a vehicle carrying hazardous goods is a substantive breach that does not absolve the insurer from liability, and rejected the owner's appeal against the insurance company's liability to pay compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 endorsement on driving licence dangerous goods

Daechang Seat Automotive Pvt. Ltd. v. Moon June Seok & Anr.

08 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 474
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing order and restored criminal proceedings against the CFO accused of misappropriating company funds, holding that prima facie material existed to proceed to trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings prima facie case misappropriation

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SMT. SUNITA SHARMA AND ORS.

08 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 469
Cites 2 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that full compensation payable under Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules must be deducted from Motor Vehicles Act awards to prevent double recovery, setting aside the High Court's partial deduction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation deduction Haryana Compassionate Assistance Rules 2006 Motor Vehicles Act compensation double recovery

Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd.

08 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 473
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of exclusive jurisdiction clauses in private employment contracts, directing suits challenging termination be filed in the courts specified therein, here Mumbai, and set aside suits filed elsewhere.

civil appeal_allowed Significant exclusive jurisdiction clause employment contract Section 28 Indian Contract Act Section 20 CPC

The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dinesh Kumar and Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 470

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land sale permission granted by an authorized Additional Collector under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, dismissed the State's appeal against the High Court's order setting aside a belated revisional order, and restored the mutation in favor of the purchaser.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 Section 165(6) Section 50 revisional powers Additional Collector jurisdiction

SRI PRASANTA KUMAR PAL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

08 Apr 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 783

The Supreme Court held that a registered gift deed executed before amendments to the West Bengal Land Reforms Act cannot be retrospectively declared benami, restoring the Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court's remand.

property appeal_allowed Significant benami transaction registered gift deed retrospective amendment West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955

Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Ram Kishori Gupta & Anr.

07 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; K. V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court held that SEBI lacks power to grant compensation to investors and that the principle of res judicata bars multiple final orders on the same cause of action, setting aside the compensation and disgorgement orders against VCL and others.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SEBI misleading advertisements disgorgement compensation

K. Gopi v. The Sub-Registrar & Ors.

07 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 462

The Supreme Court held that the registering officer cannot refuse registration of a sale deed on the ground of non-production of title documents, declaring Rule 55A(i) ultra vires the Registration Act, 1908, and allowed the appeal directing registration upon procedural compliance.

property appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act 1908 Rule 55A registration of sale deed title verification

Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir v. Brij Bhushan

07 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 461

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of an F.I.R. against the Managing Director of JKCHC, holding that prohibited land transfers under the Agrarian Reforms Act do not automatically attract criminal liability absent specific allegations of corruption.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Jammu and Kashmir Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976 Prevention of Corruption Act, 2006 Section 482 CrPC quashing of F.I.R.