Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Tilku Alias Tilak Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

06 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 226
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and abduction charges, holding that voluntary accompaniment of a girl close to majority negates the offence under Sections 363 and 366 IPC despite conflicting age evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping abduction consent minor

Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. State of Uttar Pradesh

04 Feb 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 225

The Supreme Court overturned the appellant's conviction and death sentence due to multiple procedural lapses violating the constitutional right to a fair trial, emphasizing the active role of courts, prosecution, and effective legal representation.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant fair trial Article 21 death sentence legal aid

Ashutosh Pathak v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

04 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 534

The Supreme Court upheld the trial and High Court orders refusing to summon certain witnesses and closing opportunity to examine a summoned witness under Section 311 CrPC, emphasizing judicial discretion and prevention of trial delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 311 CrPC summoning witnesses discretionary power abuse of process

Ramu Appa Mahapatar v. State of Maharashtra

04 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 147
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside a murder conviction based on unreliable extra-judicial confession and material contradictions in prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for caution in relying on such confessions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial confession circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC voluntariness of confession

Airports Authority of India v. Pradip Kumar Banerjee

04 Feb 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 149
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that departmental disciplinary proceedings require proof on preponderance of probabilities and an acquittal based on benefit of doubt in criminal proceedings does not bar dismissal from service.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental enquiry standard of proof preponderance of probabilities criminal acquittal

D.M. JAGADISH v. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

04 Feb 2025 · B.R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 157

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's order on land acquisition, holding that procedural fairness and compliance with court directions are mandatory before excluding land from acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Bangalore Development Authority exclusion from acquisition preliminary notification

Wahid v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Anshu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

04 Feb 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 145

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a robbery case due to doubtful arrest and identification procedures, emphasizing the necessity of credible evidence linking accused to the crime.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery identification benefit of doubt recovery of weapons

State of West Bengal v. M/S Santi Ceramics Pvt. Limited

04 Feb 2025 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1222

The Supreme Court held that restoration relief under the Singur acquisition quashing judgment is confined to vulnerable agricultural landowners and does not extend to industrial entities who accepted compensation and did not contest acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition restoration of land vulnerable agricultural communities Section 5-A objections

Gulshan Kumar v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection

03 Feb 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 142

The Supreme Court held that all persons with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations like scribes and compensatory time in examinations, directing the government to revise guidelines to ensure non-discriminatory, uniform implementation and grievance redressal.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant reasonable accommodation persons with disabilities scribe facility compensatory time

The State of Jharkhand v. Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Sao

03 Feb 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 153
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order under the NDPS Act after the accused was subsequently involved in another similar offence, emphasizing the need for strict scrutiny in bail matters and speedy trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail

Godrej Projects Development Limited v. Anil Karlekar & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 143

The Supreme Court upheld limiting earnest money forfeiture to 10% of the Basic Sale Price in a real estate cancellation, declaring a 20% forfeiture clause unreasonable and setting aside interest awarded on the refund.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant earnest money forfeiture real estate cancellation unfair contract Consumer Protection Act 2019

Jai Ram v. Som Prakash

03 Feb 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 227

The Supreme Court held that limitation objections not raised before the trial court cannot be entertained for the first time in appeal, restoring the revocation of Letters of Administration granted on a revoked will.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 263 Limitation Act, 1963 Article 137

Kuldeep Singh v. The State of Punjab

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 137
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings for rape against a husband where the victim was his legally wedded wife and no prima facie case was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Jiya v. Kuldeep

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 135
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the divorce decree on cruelty grounds and awarded a one-time permanent alimony of Rs. 10 lakhs to the appellant wife after assessing the parties' financial positions.

family appeal_partially_allowed Significant divorce cruelty mental cruelty permanent alimony

Shripal & Anr. v. Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 144
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that termination of workmen during conciliation proceedings without statutory compliance is illegal, directing reinstatement with continuity, partial back wages, and a fair process for regularization despite recruitment bans.

labor appeal_allowed Significant U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 6E Section 6N termination during conciliation

Karuppudayar v. State

31 Jan 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 132
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under the SC-ST Act as the alleged caste-based abuse did not occur in a place within public view, a necessary ingredient for the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC SC-ST Act public view quashing of criminal proceedings

C & C Constructions Ltd. v. IRCON International Ltd.

31 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 138
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld a contractual clause barring claims for damages due to employer-caused delays and dismissed the appellant's challenge to the arbitral award rejecting such claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 clause 49.[5] GCC extension of time limitation of liability

Rakesh Kumar Charmakar & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

31 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 136

The Supreme Court held that temporary employees appointed against sanctioned posts under a Special Recruitment Drive are entitled to regular pay-scale benefits after three years, overruling the High Court Division Bench's denial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Special Recruitment Drive Regular pay-scale Temporary employees Part-time sweepers

Karan Singh v. State of Haryana

31 Jan 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 133
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment soon before death, thus negating the presumption under Section 113-B of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

JASMINBHAI BHARATBHAI KOTHARI v. STATE OF GUJARAT

30 Jan 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 172

The Supreme Court held that exemption from surrendering under Order XXII Rule 5 of its Rules is only maintainable where the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment, and dismissed the petition challenging refusal to extend temporary bail as infructuous after the petitioner surrendered.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 5 exemption from surrendering temporary bail sentence of imprisonment