Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

08 Jan 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of Vinod Kumar for kidnapping a child for ransom, affirming the appellate court's power to reappreciate evidence and reject minor discrepancies in witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal kidnapping for ransom ransom letters Section 364-A IPC

Manojbhai N. Shah & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court ruled that employees retired under a special voluntary retirement scheme with enhanced benefits are not entitled to retrospective pay revision for pension calculation under a subsequent pay revision Notification.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Retrospective Pay Revision Pension Calculation Article 14

Raghuvendra v. State of M.P.

07 Jan 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of Raghuvendra based on last seen theory, confession, recovery of deceased's articles, and credible eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC last seen theory circumstantial evidence

Union of India v. Anju Jain

06 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld that employees initially appointed as Junior Machine Operators are entitled to pay re-fixation as Data Entry Operator Grade 'A' from their appointment date under the 1989 government pay scale rationalization.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant pay fixation Electronic Data Processing posts Data Entry Operator Grade A Junior Machine Operator

Nargis Jal Haradhvala v. State of Maharashtra

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that the appellant must surrender 20% of permissible floor space to Government nominees as per the Government's corrigendum, overruling the High Court and clarifying the non-retrospective effect of the Shantistar Builders judgment.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act Section 20 exemption Government nominees quota floor space index

M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. v. Krishna Kant Pandey

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court restored the Industrial Tribunal's finding that the respondent was not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act and held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with factual findings and directing legislative amendment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman definition Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 2(z) High Court jurisdiction

Inder Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of 16 accused for murder and assault under Section 149 IPC while acquitting five for insufficient corroboration, affirming principles on unlawful assembly liability and identification in multi-accused cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object identification of accused

M/s Swati Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation

06 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition seeking transfer of leasehold rights over industrial land due to disputed factual issues, directing the parties to resolve the matter in Civil Court.

civil appeal_dismissed Article 226 writ petition disputed question of fact leasehold rights

Union of India v. S.N. Maity

06 Jan 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a tenure appointment on deputation cannot be arbitrarily curtailed without valid reasons, and where reinstatement is impractical, compensation for the unserved tenure period is appropriate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment on deputation premature repatriation tenure post Articles 14 and 16

K.K. Kuda v. Chief Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate & Anr.

06 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. N. Nagappan

The Supreme Court quashed the complaint against a bank official under FERA due to suppression of material facts and improper cognizance, holding that prosecution cannot continue on dropped allegations of consent and connivance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 56 FERA consent and connivance negligence

Phool Patti v. Ram Singh

06 Jan 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld a consent decree based on a family settlement transferring ancestral property, clarified registration requirements for gifts of self-acquired property, and held that legal heirs lacked locus standii to challenge the decree without proper pleadings or evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consent decree family settlement registration of deed Registration Act 1908

Om Prakash v. Shanti Devi

05 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; M. Y. Eqbal; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that a Gift Deed tendered before completing thirty years cannot invoke the presumption of due execution under Section 90 of the Evidence Act without proper proof of attesting witnesses.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed Section 90 Indian Evidence Act attesting witnesses proof of execution

Union of India & Anr. v. Purushottam

05 Jan 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that Article 20(2) bars double punishment only in criminal prosecutions, not departmental proceedings, restored the Summary Court Martial findings, quashed the discharge order, and allowed departmental action against the Respondent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Summary Court Martial Army Act 1950

M/S VELLANKI FRAME WORKS v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

18 Dec 2014 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that sales effected after customs clearance by the importer are inter-State sales liable to CST, rejecting the appellant's claim of high seas sale exemption under Section 5(2) of the CST Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant high seas sale Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 5(2) CST Act importer

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955

17 Dec 2014 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 789
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, affirming Parliament's plenary power under Article 11 to confer citizenship on migrants from Bangladesh to Assam beyond constitutional cut-off dates.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 6A Citizenship Act Parliamentary competence Article 11 Citizenship Articles 6 and 7 Article 14 discrimination

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2022 INSC 185

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder burden of proof Section 302 IPC

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence and clarified that suspicion and Section 106 Evidence Act do not shift the burden of proof in criminal cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Prabhu Dayal v. The State of Rajasthan

17 Sep 2014 · L. Nageswara Rao; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant under Sections 302/149 IPC, affirming that mere membership of an unlawful assembly with a common object attracts vicarious liability despite minor contradictions in prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly first information report vicarious liability

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Penna Electricity Limited

25 Aug 2014 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1439
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Supreme Court held that power supplied by a gas turbine unit prior to combined cycle COD is firm power payable with fixed charges, aligning unapproved PPAs with regulatory tariff regulations under the Electricity Act, 2003.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Power Purchase Agreement Commercial Operation Date Electricity Act 2003 Fixed Charges

Cochin Port Trust v. M/S Areebee Star Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

13 Aug 2014 · R. K. Agrawal; Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court referred key questions on liability for port charges under the Major Port Trusts Act, including the roles of steamer agents and consignees, to a larger Bench for authoritative resolution.

administrative other Significant Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 Tariff Authority for Major Ports ground rent steamer agent liability