Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Binoy & Anr. v. State of Kerala

13 Feb 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Sections 324, 452, and 323 IPC and affirmed the refusal to grant probation due to the serious nature of the offences and sufficient prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 324 IPC Section 452 IPC Section 323 IPC Probation of Offenders Act

P.V. Guru Raj Reddy v. P. Neeradha Reddy

13 Feb 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that plaints disclosing cause of action and filed within limitation cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, and the Benami Transactions Act does not bar suits for declaration of title and possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action limitation

State of M.P. v. Mehtaab

13 Feb 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that reduction of sentence in a death by negligence case must be accompanied by just compensation to the victim's heirs, directing the accused and State to pay a total of Rs. 5 lakhs as compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304A IPC Section 337 IPC Section 357A CrPC compensation to victim

Union of India & Anr. v. Rajbir Singh

13 Feb 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disability pension claims must be granted if the disability is assessed above 20% and presumed to be service-related unless the employer disproves this with cogent reasons, overruling Medical Board opinions lacking such reasons.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 medical board opinion

National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Ashok Kumar Singh & Ors.

13 Feb 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.K. Agrawal; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that earnest money deposited with a tender is liable to be forfeited upon withdrawal of the tender by the bidder if such forfeiture is stipulated as a contractual condition, notwithstanding the bidder's right to withdraw under Section 5 of the Indian Contract Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant earnest money forfeiture withdrawal of tender Section 5 Indian Contract Act

Raveesh Chand Jain v. Raj Rani Jain

12 Feb 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld a possession decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on prior ownership findings and res judicata, but held damages require separate adjudication, dismissing the appeal with conditions on possession and damages.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC res judicata possession suit decree on admissions

Devendra Kumar v. M/s Gail (India) Ltd

12 Feb 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that claims waived by contract terms are not arbitrable, but claims for additional works remain arbitrable despite final decisions by contract officials, and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Extended stay compensation Additional works claim

Sai Kripa Mangal Karyalaya v. Nagpur Municipal Corporation

12 Feb 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging building permits granted by Nagpur Municipal Corporation, holding that the petition was a private dispute and that the permits were valid under delegated planning authority powers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Public Interest Litigation Planning Authority Building Permits Development Plan

Medical Council of India v. Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute

11 Feb 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that 2009-10 MBBS admissions by Dr. M.G.R. Institute were unauthorized at the time but directed re-examination and upheld subsequent recognition, balancing student interests and public safety.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Deemed to be University Medical Council of India Unauthorized admissions University Grants Commission Act

Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta & Ors.

11 Feb 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that at the summoning stage, only a prima facie case is required without detailed evidence evaluation, setting aside the High Court's order and restoring the Magistrate's summons against accused persons in a fraudulent FIR case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prima facie case summoning order cognizance fraudulent FIR

KRISHNA HARE GAUR v. VINOD KUMAR TYAGI

11 Feb 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that an appointment obtained by forged documents is void and not protected by res judicata, allowing cancellation of such appointment despite prior dismissal of challenges.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment by fraud forged experience certificates res judicata cancellation of appointment

Bhim Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Feb 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under dowry death and cruelty provisions, affirming that circumstantial evidence and statutory presumptions under Sections 304-B IPC and 113-B Evidence Act were sufficiently proved against the appellants.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Madhukar Sadbha Shivarkar BY LRS. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

11 Feb 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government’s power to appoint enquiry officers to investigate fraudulent land holdings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act despite limitation, dismissing challenges based on finality and fundamental rights.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 land ceiling fraud revenue records

Dasin Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh

11 Feb 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on a reliable dying declaration and failure of the accused to explain circumstances under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act circumstantial evidence

Kamlesh Aggarwal v. Narain Singh Dabbas & Anr.

10 Feb 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that consumer forums must follow CrPC summary trial procedures for penal actions under Section 27 and allowed remand for proper trial while upholding the finality of appeal provisions under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 27 Section 27A summary trial

M/S BENNET COLEMAN & CO. LTD v. STATE OF BIHAR

10 Feb 2015 · Kurian Joseph; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that Wage Board recommendations under the Working Journalists Act are not awards under the Industrial Disputes Act, and prosecution under Section 25U of the I.D. Act for their non-implementation is not maintainable; enforcement lies under the Working Journalists Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Working Journalists Act Industrial Disputes Act Wage Board recommendations award vs recommendation

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited v. Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

10 Feb 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the tariff orders of the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission, affirming principles of tariff determination under the Electricity Act, 2003 and limiting appellate interference to substantial questions of law.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 tariff determination cross subsidy cost of supply

Khursheed Ahmad Khan v. State of U.P. & Ors.

09 Feb 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court upheld the removal of a government servant for contracting a second marriage without permission, holding that such conduct rules do not violate Article 25's freedom of religion as polygamy is not an integral religious practice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bigamy government servant misconduct U.P. Government Servant Conduct Rules Article 25 Constitution of India

M/S ANVIL CABLES PVT LTD v. COMMNR.OF CENTRAL TAXES & SERVICE TAX

06 Feb 2015 · ANIL R. DAVE; SHIVA KIRTI SINGH

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's civil appeal conditionally upon payment of costs, set aside the impugned High Court judgment, and restored the tax appeal for hearing on merits.

tax appeal_allowed tax appeal costs restoration of appeal conditional setting aside

Professor Ramesh Chandra v. University of Delhi

06 Feb 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that while the University’s disciplinary proceedings against Professor Ramesh Chandra were largely valid, denial of legal representation and appointment of a potentially biased inquiry officer were improper, and certain charges did not constitute misconduct warranting termination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry natural justice legal representation misconduct