Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

T.M. Sampath v. Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources

20 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees of autonomous bodies like NWDA and JNVS are not entitled to Central Government pension schemes unless explicitly adopted, and financial considerations justify differential pension benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Contributory Provident Fund Rules, 1962 Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Office Memorandum dated 01.05.1987 National Water Development Agency

Walter Bau AG v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

20 Jan 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that an arbitrator's appointment contrary to the agreed procedure and ICADR Rules is invalid and exercised its jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to appoint a new arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator ICADR Rules

Union of India & Anr. v. Surender Singh Parmar

20 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of a naval personnel to condonation of shortfall in qualifying service for pension, declaring Regulation 82(a) unconstitutional and clarifying the effective date of pension benefits.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of shortfall pensionable service Navy Pension Regulations 1964 Regulation 82(a)

Manik Taneja & Anr. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

20 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR against appellants for Facebook comments, holding that mere online criticism without criminal force or intent does not constitute offences under Sections 353 and 506 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 353 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR

Laxmidevamma v. Ranganath

20 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court restored the trial and appellate courts' concurrent findings that the appellants own the land earmarked for road but not acquired, allowing their suit for declaration and possession and setting aside the High Court's interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant concurrent findings Section 100 CPC ownership declaration land earmarked for road

Tarabai v. State of Maharashtra

20 Jan 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a mother-in-law for dowry death under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC, affirming the application of Section 113-A Evidence Act presumption and rejecting claims of delay and police tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-A Evidence Act

Tomaso Bruno & Anr. v. State of U.P.

20 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to failure of prosecution to produce best evidence (CCTV footage) and inconclusive medical evidence, breaking the chain of circumstantial proof.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 114(g) Indian Evidence Act

Kulbir Singh v. State of Haryana

19 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's orders on land acquisition matters under the same notification, remanding them for fresh consideration in line with its prior binding judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition government notification binding precedent remand

Executive Officer, Antiyur Town Panchayat v. G. Arumugam

19 Jan 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court condoned a 1373-day delay in filing a second appeal caused by official lapses of a government officer and remitted the case for further consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay second appeal government officials public servants

SEC. TO GOV. INFORMATION PUB. REL. DEP. v. JOHN MARIA JESUDOSS

16 Jan 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that disciplinary punishment based on distinct misconduct can be validly imposed notwithstanding prior orders, but substituted removal with compulsory retirement as the former was disproportionate.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge sheet removal from service compulsory retirement

Sanjaysinh Ramrao Chavan v. Dattatray Gulabrao Phalke

16 Jan 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2014 (10) SCALE 660
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Magistrate's order accepting a closure report and discharging an accused cannot be set aside by the High Court merely because another view is possible, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the cognizance stage and protecting against unmerited prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant taking cognizance closure report Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 173 Cr.P.C.

Manohar Singh v. State of Rajasthan

16 Jan 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that courts have a mandatory duty to consider and award victim compensation under Section 357 CrPC in every criminal case and directed payment of compensation to the appellant, setting aside the High Court's order granting probation without compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 357 CrPC victim compensation application of mind criminal sentencing

NARENDRA KUMAR AMIN v. CBI

15 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that filing of the police report within 90 days with required particulars satisfies the condition for default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., and dismissed the appellant's claim for default bail in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. police report Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.

Mansoor Alam v. State of U.P. & Anr.

15 Jan 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a murder convict with serious criminal antecedents, emphasizing the need to consider such antecedents before granting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail criminal antecedents murder Section 302 IPC

Mahesh Kumar Joshi v. Madan Singh Negi

15 Jan 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed setting aside of an ex-parte decree in a summary suit for dishonour of cheque, granting leave to defend subject to deposit of the decretal amount to balance equities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC ex-parte decree setting aside decree dishonour of cheque

State of Punjab v. Bawa Singh

15 Jan 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's lenient sentence reduction in a grievous injury case, emphasizing that sentencing must be proportionate to the offence's gravity to maintain public confidence and deterrence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sentencing principles proportionate punishment undue sympathy grievous injury

Rajinder Kumar v. State of Haryana

14 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304B IPC, affirming that death caused by poisoning within seven years of marriage with proven dowry harassment presumes dowry death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act aluminium phosphide poisoning

K.V.S. Ram v. Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corpn.

14 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court restored the Labour Court's award reinstating a dismissed employee without back wages, holding that inordinate delay and disproportionate punishment justify interference with dismissal under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry delay industrial disputes act Section 11A Labour Court discretion

Sunil v. Sakshi @ Shweta

14 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court allowed the husband's appeal, restoring the Family Court's divorce decree and holding that the High Court erred in setting it aside on unproven fraud allegations without evidence.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act divorce decree fraud allegation vakalatnama misuse

Vijaya Ukarda Athor (Athawale) v. State of Maharashtra

14 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for fresh consideration of a married daughter's claim for compassionate appointment in light of applicable government policies and facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment married daughter eligibility Government Resolution 26.10.1994 policy decision 26.02.2013