Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Chairman & Managing Director Central Bank of India v. Central Bank of India SC/ST Employees Welfare Association

09 Jan 2015 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that reservation in promotions for SC/ST employees in public sector banks applies up to Scale-VI posts, with only concession (not reservation) beyond that, clarifying the interpretation of government memoranda and constitutional provisions.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation in promotion Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Article 16(4A)

Darga Ram @ Gunga v. State of Rajasthan

08 Jan 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape and murder but set aside the sentence after determining he was a juvenile at the time of the offence, entitling him to juvenile protections under the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence juvenile justice age determination medical board opinion

Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana

08 Jan 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of Vinod Kumar for kidnapping a child for ransom, affirming the appellate court's power to reappreciate evidence and reject minor discrepancies in witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal kidnapping for ransom ransom letters Section 364-A IPC

Manojbhai N. Shah & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

07 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court ruled that employees retired under a special voluntary retirement scheme with enhanced benefits are not entitled to retrospective pay revision for pension calculation under a subsequent pay revision Notification.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Retrospective Pay Revision Pension Calculation Article 14

Raghuvendra v. State of M.P.

07 Jan 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of Raghuvendra based on last seen theory, confession, recovery of deceased's articles, and credible eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC last seen theory circumstantial evidence

Union of India v. Anju Jain

06 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld that employees initially appointed as Junior Machine Operators are entitled to pay re-fixation as Data Entry Operator Grade 'A' from their appointment date under the 1989 government pay scale rationalization.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant pay fixation Electronic Data Processing posts Data Entry Operator Grade A Junior Machine Operator

Nargis Jal Haradhvala v. State of Maharashtra

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that the appellant must surrender 20% of permissible floor space to Government nominees as per the Government's corrigendum, overruling the High Court and clarifying the non-retrospective effect of the Shantistar Builders judgment.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act Section 20 exemption Government nominees quota floor space index

M/s. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. v. Krishna Kant Pandey

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court restored the Industrial Tribunal's finding that the respondent was not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act and held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with factual findings and directing legislative amendment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant workman definition Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 2(z) High Court jurisdiction

Inder Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

06 Jan 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld convictions of 16 accused for murder and assault under Section 149 IPC while acquitting five for insufficient corroboration, affirming principles on unlawful assembly liability and identification in multi-accused cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object identification of accused

M/s Swati Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation

06 Jan 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition seeking transfer of leasehold rights over industrial land due to disputed factual issues, directing the parties to resolve the matter in Civil Court.

civil appeal_dismissed Article 226 writ petition disputed question of fact leasehold rights

Union of India v. S.N. Maity

06 Jan 2015 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a tenure appointment on deputation cannot be arbitrarily curtailed without valid reasons, and where reinstatement is impractical, compensation for the unserved tenure period is appropriate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment on deputation premature repatriation tenure post Articles 14 and 16

K.K. Kuda v. Chief Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate & Anr.

06 Jan 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. N. Nagappan

The Supreme Court quashed the complaint against a bank official under FERA due to suppression of material facts and improper cognizance, holding that prosecution cannot continue on dropped allegations of consent and connivance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 56 FERA consent and connivance negligence

Phool Patti v. Ram Singh

06 Jan 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld a consent decree based on a family settlement transferring ancestral property, clarified registration requirements for gifts of self-acquired property, and held that legal heirs lacked locus standii to challenge the decree without proper pleadings or evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consent decree family settlement registration of deed Registration Act 1908

Om Prakash v. Shanti Devi

05 Jan 2015 · Anil R. Dave; M. Y. Eqbal; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that a Gift Deed tendered before completing thirty years cannot invoke the presumption of due execution under Section 90 of the Evidence Act without proper proof of attesting witnesses.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed Section 90 Indian Evidence Act attesting witnesses proof of execution

Union of India & Anr. v. Purushottam

05 Jan 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that Article 20(2) bars double punishment only in criminal prosecutions, not departmental proceedings, restored the Summary Court Martial findings, quashed the discharge order, and allowed departmental action against the Respondent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Summary Court Martial Army Act 1950

Satendra Singh v. Vinod Kumar Bhalotia

18 Dec 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld eviction of a tenant unlawfully occupying premises after expiry of a fixed term tenancy and imposed user charges for the period of unlawful occupation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant fixed term tenancy eviction Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act 1972 Section 106 Transfer of Property Act

K.K. Saksena v. International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage

18 Dec 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage is not a 'State' nor performs public functions making it amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of the appellant's services.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction public function

Additional District and Sessions Judge ‘X’ v. High Court of Madhya Pradesh and others

18 Dec 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the exclusive applicability of its in-house procedure for inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct against a sitting High Court Judge, dismissing the writ petition challenging the internal inquiry process.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant in-house procedure judicial misconduct sexual harassment High Court Judge

Banarsi Dass and others v. State of Haryana

18 Dec 2014 · Kurian Joseph; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside convictions under Section 304B IPC due to inadmissibility of the dying declaration and absence of causation of death by burns, while maintaining convictions under Section 498A IPC where evidence of cruelty existed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Indian Evidence Act Section 32(1)

B.A. Linga Reddy v. Karnataka State Transport Authority

18 Dec 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that the State Government must assign reasons while modifying transport schemes under Section 102 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and upheld the quashing of modifications made without such reasons, affirming the retrospective effect of its decision prohibiting permits on overlapping notified routes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 102 Modification of transport scheme Natural justice