Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

DR. AMARAGOUDA L PATIL v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Jun 2014 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 201
Cites 0 · Cited by 34

The Supreme Court quashed the appointment of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Homeopathy for non-compliance with mandatory statutory eligibility criteria and procedural irregularities, emphasizing strict adherence to qualifications and limited but necessary judicial review.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Homeopathy Act, 2020 eligibility criteria Head of a Department judicial review

State of U.P. & Anr. v. Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors.

30 May 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2017 INSC 668
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory minimum qualifications for teachers under the RTE Act, quashing Uttar Pradesh's attempt to regularize unqualified Shiksha Mitras as teachers.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Shiksha Mitras Teacher Eligibility Test Minimum qualifications for teachers

State of U.P. & Anr. v. Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors.

30 May 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of Uttar Pradesh's attempt to regularize unqualified Shiksha Mitras as teachers, affirming the mandatory statutory qualifications under the RTE Act and limiting relaxation powers to the Central Government.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Shiksha Mitras Teacher Eligibility Test Minimum qualifications for teachers

Amar Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

09 May 2014 · Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court overturned murder convictions based on sole eye witness testimony found to be unnatural and unreliable, emphasizing the need for credible corroboration and consistency with medical evidence.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant sole eye witness testimony Section 302 IPC murder conviction corroboration

Union of India v. Nallam Shiva

11 Apr 2014 · Dipak Misra; Amitava Roy; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of an Air Force personnel for overstaying leave without intimation, rejecting the Tribunal's order of reinstatement and modifying dismissal to discharge simplicitor on humanitarian grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Air Force Act, 1950 District Court Martial overstaying casual leave disciplinary authority

Bhagwati Devi v. State of Uttarakhand

10 Apr 2014 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1051

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant mother-in-law of dowry harassment charges under Section 498-A IPC due to lack of credible evidence proving cruelty or dowry demand leading to the daughter-in-law's suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC dowry harassment cruelty suicide

Ravi Prakash Singh @ Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar

24 Dec 2013 · Prafulla C. Pant; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that filing the charge sheet on the ninetieth day complies with Section 167(2) CrPC, and the accused is not entitled to bail if the charge sheet is filed within the statutory period.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 167(2) CrPC charge sheet filing bail entitlement period of ninety days

Collector of Land Acquisition v. M/S Andaman Timber Industries

28 Nov 2013 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a perpetual license under the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Regulation confers an interest in land entitling the licensee to compensation upon acquisition, and dismissed the review petition challenging this principle.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition licensee interest Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Regulation, 1966 Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.K. Kunhiraman

09 May 2013 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the interim status quo in a Cooperative Society membership dispute and directed the High Court to expeditiously dispose of the related writ petition without being influenced by prior observations.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural Cooperative Society enrollment of members expulsion of members status quo

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Ramesh Chand v. Suresh Chand

09 Apr 2012 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, and Will do not confer title without a registered sale deed and proper proof, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession and protecting the bona fide purchaser's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 Section 53A Agreement to Sell

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mahendra Alias Golu

08 Oct 2011 · Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 24

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's acts went beyond mere preparation and constituted an attempt to commit rape under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 IPC, restoring his conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

Jayaswamy v. State of Karnataka

12 Aug 2011 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; L. Nageswara Rao
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for causing grievous hurt but set aside his murder conviction, emphasizing that appellate courts should not disturb acquittals without substantial and compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate interference common intention grievous hurt

M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. v. M/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD.

21 Jul 2011 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1059
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the Jogighopa Act are not governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act, and in absence of prescribed limitation, appeals must be filed within reasonable time, allowing the delayed appeal filed by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 116 Jogighopa Act, 1990 Commissioner of Payments

M/S. AJAR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SATYANARAYAN SOMANI

03 Jun 2011 · JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR; DR D Y CHANDRACHUD

The Supreme Court held that renewal of a public lease is discretionary and must be exercised in public interest with transparency, setting aside a flawed lease renewal and conversion to freehold by UDA in favor of a private developer.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal public land Ujjain Development Authority leasehold rights

Smt Sulekha Rani v. Union of India

28 Mar 2011 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that discharge of an army personnel on medical grounds without an Invalidation Medical Board is illegal and directed grant of family pension treating service as continuing until death.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Invalidation Medical Board Army Rules 1954 medical discharge family pension

Delhi Development Authority v. Prithi Pal Singh

24 Dec 2010 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that actual physical possession is required under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act to deny de-notification and used its constitutional power under Article 142 to settle a decades-old land dispute by allocating part of the land to DDA and the remainder to the respondent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 48 Physical possession De-notification

Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan v. State of West Bengal

09 Dec 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of ganja but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and the law as it stood at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 ganja possession conscious possession

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sakru Mahagu Binjewar

14 Jul 2010 · Arun Mishra; Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai; Surya Kant
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for brutal murders but commuted death sentences to life imprisonment with a minimum 25-year term, reaffirming the 'rarest of rare' doctrine and sentencing principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death penalty rarest of rare life imprisonment commutation of sentence

P. Daivasigamani v. S. Sambandan

15 Jun 2010 · Bela M. Trivedi; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance of a sale agreement, holding that the plaintiff had proved readiness and willingness within limitation and that time was not the essence of the contract for immovable property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness limitation Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act