Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Abhishek Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

31 May 2010 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 924
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC due to unreliable dying declarations and insufficient corroborative evidence, emphasizing strict scrutiny of multiple dying declarations and procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC multiple dying declarations reliability of evidence

Achhar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

27 May 2010 · Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose · 2021 INSC 289
Cites 10 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder and grievous hurt, holding that appellate interference with trial acquittal is justified when the trial Court's judgment is perverse and overlooks consistent, corroborated evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 378 CrPC Acquittal Perverse judgment Eyewitness testimony

Achhar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

27 May 2010 · Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 10 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder and grievous hurt, affirming that appellate courts may interfere with trial acquittals when based on perverse findings and that exaggerations in witness testimony do not vitiate core truthful evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal conviction Section 378 CrPC presumption of innocence

Surinder Singh v. State (Union Territory of Chandigarh)

19 May 2010 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC but acquitted him of misuse of arms under Section 27 of the Arms Act, reducing his sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 27 Arms Act attempt to murder intention to kill

Diwan Singh v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

19 Apr 2010 · Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld compulsory retirement of a LIC cashier for temporary embezzlement and forgery, emphasizing loss of confidence over the amount involved as the key factor in disciplinary punishment.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant temporary embezzlement forgery compulsory retirement loss of confidence

Trust & Anr. v. Sh. Diwan Chand

05 Apr 2010 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's decree granting possession to the appellants, holding that respondents failed to disprove appellants' ownership of the disputed property forming part of Khasra No. 4833 and that adverse possession was not established.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession adverse possession Khasra No. 4833 Local Commissioner report

Trust v. Sh. Diwan Chand

05 Apr 2010 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's decree granting possession to the appellants, holding that the disputed property is part of Khasra No. 4833 owned by them and rejecting respondents' adverse possession claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Khasra No. 4833 adverse possession possession suit Local Commissioner report

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT COMPANY v. INCOME TAX OFFICER

01 Apr 2010 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 468

The Supreme Court upheld disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for failure to deduct TDS on payments to truck operators as sub-contractors under Section 194C, affirming that such payments are taxable and TDS provisions apply irrespective of written contracts.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 194C Section 40(a)(ia) Tax Deducted at Source Sub-contractor

Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab

15 Mar 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose · REPORTABLE RE 2021 INSC 299
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304-B IPC for dowry death, affirming the application of the presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act and rejecting the appellant's defense.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304-B IPC dowry death Section 113-B Evidence Act presumption of dowry death

Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab

15 Mar 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 304-B IPC for dowry death, affirming the application of the presumption under Section 113-B Evidence Act and rejecting the appellant's defense.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304-B IPC dowry death Section 113-B Evidence Act presumption of dowry death

Palanisamy and Ors. v. K Dhanpalan

05 Feb 2010 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court set aside a disciplinary committee's finding of professional misconduct due to denial of cross-examination and reliance on untranslated vernacular documents, emphasizing adherence to natural justice in such enquiries.

professional_regulation appeal_allowed Significant professional misconduct disciplinary enquiry natural justice cross-examination

State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Ganapati Rahatol

21 Jan 2010 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must grant leave to appeal against acquittal if a prima facie case exists, setting aside the refusal where medical evidence contradicted the High Court’s findings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant leave to appeal Section 378(3) CrPC acquittal prima facie case

State of Maharashtra v. Shankar Ganapati Rahatol

21 Jan 2010 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must grant leave to appeal under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. if a prima facie case exists, setting aside refusal based on erroneous appreciation of medical evidence and ordering reconsideration of acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. leave to appeal acquittal prima facie case

Avtar Singh v. State of Punjab

15 Jan 2010 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside conviction under the Essential Commodities Act as the seizure by an unauthorized police officer was invalid under the LPG Order, 1988.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Order, 1988 search and seizure unauthorized possession

Sanjiv Kumar @ Gora v. State of Punjab

08 Nov 2009 · Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a police officer for robbery, trespass, and wrongful confinement, rejecting claims of scapegoating and delay-based sentence reduction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant robbery wrongful confinement house trespass false FIR

Bijender @ Mandar v. State of Haryana

07 Sep 2009 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli · AIR 1954 SC 1
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, holding that conviction solely on disclosure statements without credible corroborative evidence and in presence of hostile witnesses cannot sustain.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disclosure statement recovery of incriminating articles benefit of doubt concurrent findings

N. Raghavender v. State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI

18 Jun 2009 · N.V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction for criminal breach of trust, cheating, and falsification of accounts due to insufficient evidence and procedural lapses, emphasizing the necessity of proving mens rea and lawful authorization in bank fraud cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust Section 409 IPC cheating Section 420 IPC

Padma Mishra v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.

09 Jun 2009 · Indira Banerjee; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 179

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash an FIR under the Gangsters Act, holding that prima facie allegations of violence and intimidation justify registration and the limited scope of quashing under Article 226.

criminal appeal_dismissed quashing of FIR Article 226 Gangsters Act definition of gangster

National Insurance Company Ltd. v. M/s. Hareshwar Enterprises (P) Ltd.

27 Mar 2009 · A. S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for filing a consumer complaint against an insurer runs from the date of repudiation or failure to settle the claim, and that a surveyor's report, while important, is not conclusive if credible contrary evidence is produced.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation cause of action consumer protection insurance claim

Devi Lal v. State of Rajasthan

30 Jan 2009 · Ranjan Gogoi; K. M. Joseph; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside murder convictions based on incomplete circumstantial evidence and uncorroborated extra judicial confession, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession Section 302 IPC Section 120B IPC