Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Anil s/o Jagannath Rana v. Rajendra s/o Radhakishan Rana

18 Dec 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that after a final judicial decision declining arbitration under Section 8(1) of the Arbitration Act, parties cannot invoke Section 11(6) jurisdiction for appointment of an arbitrator, applying res judicata and issue estoppel principles.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 8(1) Section 8(3) Section 11(6)

Sudershan Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

18 Dec 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of appellants charged with illegal sale of government wheat, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Acquittal Presumption of innocence Reasonable doubt Conspiracy

Kumod Kumar & another v. State of Jharkhand & others

18 Dec 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that Steno Sub-Inspectors and general line Sub-Inspectors belong to distinct cadres, and seniority in the general line must be counted from the date of appointment to that line, not from initial appointment as Steno Sub-Inspectors.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Police cadre Steno Sub-Inspector General line Seniority

State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih

18 Dec 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that recovery of excess payments made to employees due to employer's mistake is impermissible if it causes undue hardship or is arbitrary, especially for lower-rung or retired employees, thereby upholding the High Court's quashing of recovery orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recovery of excess payment employer mistake equity and good conscience Article 14

State of U.P. v. Parmanand Shukla

18 Dec 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal and directed payment of Rs. 10 lakhs to the deceased employee's legal representatives as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant daily wage employees muster roll reinstatement monetary compensation

M/S VELLANKI FRAME WORKS v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

18 Dec 2014 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that sales effected after customs clearance by the importer are inter-State sales liable to CST, rejecting the appellant's claim of high seas sale exemption under Section 5(2) of the CST Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant high seas sale Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 5(2) CST Act importer

Rajinder Singh v. State of Haryana

17 Dec 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under self-defence in a sudden fight, setting aside the Arms Act conviction and ordering his release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant self-defence culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC

Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

17 Dec 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a resigned non-executive Director under Section 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that specific averments of responsibility at the relevant time are essential to impose vicarious liability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 vicarious liability

All Assam Ahom Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

17 Dec 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that delay alone cannot bar petitions challenging Section 6A of the Citizenship Act affecting fundamental rights of Assam's citizens and framed substantial constitutional questions for determination.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Section 6A Citizenship Act Article 32 Constitution Assam Accord Illegal migration Assam

International Amusement Limited v. India Trade Promotion Organisation

17 Dec 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disputes under the Public Premises Act are not arbitrable and that the Estate Officer has exclusive jurisdiction, dismissing the appeal against the High Court's order setting aside arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Public Premises Act exclusive jurisdiction Estate Officer

THE MANAGER MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. v. SURESH S/O DADARAO GADGE

17 Dec 2014 · ANIL R. DAVE; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court denied reinstatement to a daily wage employee engaged irregularly after unit closure but awarded compensation in lieu thereof.

labor appeal_allowed Significant daily wage employment irregular appointment reinstatement retrenchment compensation

State of Punjab v. Labh Singh

17 Dec 2014 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit · 1958 SCR 1040
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act is not required to prosecute retired public servants, but protection under section 197 CrPC continues for IPC offences even after retirement, barring prosecution without sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction to prosecute Prevention of Corruption Act section 19 POC Act section 197 CrPC

Mahadeo Narayan More & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra

17 Dec 2014 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on credible dying declarations and consistent evidence, dismissing the appeal against life imprisonment for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC life imprisonment

State of Punjab v. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.

17 Dec 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that battery chargers sold with cell phones are accessories taxable at the general rate, not part of the cell phone attracting concessional tax under Punjab VAT Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant battery charger cell phone accessory composite package

M/s. Ram Barai Singh & Co. v. State of Bihar & Ors.

17 Dec 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause does not automatically bar a writ petition under Article 226, especially when no objection was raised earlier and the contract was executed long ago, restoring the Single Judge's order allowing the writ petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause writ petition Article 226 alternative remedy

State Tr. Insp. of Police v. A. Arun Kumar & Anr.

17 Dec 2014 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored charges against accused in a duty drawback fraud case, holding that the High Court erred in discharging them for lack of prima facie material at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Prevention of Corruption Act Section 15 POC Act

RAMAN v. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

17 Dec 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored a Rs. 60 lakh compensation award for a child victim of electrocution due to electricity department's negligence, emphasizing strict liability and exclusive right of the victim and heirs to the compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant electrocution compensation permanent disability Indian Electricity Act, 2003

State of Punjab v. Jagga Singh

17 Dec 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of two accused for murder based on credible eyewitness and fingerprint evidence while acquitting others for lack of conspiracy proof.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC fingerprint evidence Identification of Prisoners Act

IN RE : SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT 1955

17 Dec 2014 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; J B Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 789
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, affirming Parliament's plenary power under Article 11 to confer citizenship on migrants from Bangladesh to Assam beyond constitutional cut-off dates.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 6A Citizenship Act Parliamentary competence Article 11 Citizenship Articles 6 and 7 Article 14 discrimination

PRICOL LIMITED v. JOHNSON CONTROLS ENTERPRISE LTD. & ORS.

16 Dec 2014 · RANJAN GOGOI

The Supreme Court held that the appointment of an arbitrator by SIAC under the arbitration clause with Singapore as seat is valid and refused to interfere under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, dismissing the petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration clause seat of arbitration Singapore International Arbitration Centre Section 11(6) Arbitration Act