Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

SHASHIKALA & ORS. v. GANGALAKSHMAMMA & ANR.

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by taking the higher income of the deceased, applying deductions and multiplier, awarded substantial conventional damages, and referred the question of future prospects addition for self-employed persons to a larger Bench.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation future prospects self-employed

M/s. Muneer Enterprises v. M/s Ramgad Minerals and Mining Ltd.

12 Mar 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that surrender of a mining lease is effective only after mandatory 12 months' notice and acceptance by the State, and non-compliance with Forest Act approvals does not render the lease void ab initio but can be regularized by ex post facto approval.

property appeal_dismissed Significant mining lease surrender Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Section 2 approval

BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. v. SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH

12 Mar 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's order restraining withdrawal of deposited funds pending disposal of all related applications in a company liquidation matter and directed expeditious disposal of pending applications.

civil appeal_dismissed company liquidation deposit with Registrar withdrawal of funds pending applications

M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. v. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

12 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Electro Deposition Coating on inputs does not amount to manufacture attracting excise duty beyond MODVAT credit reversal, allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the differential duty demand.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture processing value addition excise duty

Charu Kishor Mehta v. Joint Charity Commissioner, Greater Bombay Region & Ors.

12 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of trustees' delegation of powers to a Managing Trustee under the Trust Deed and dismissed the appeal challenging the non-imposition of penalties on co-trustees for alleged mismanagement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant public charitable trust delegation of powers Managing Trustee Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950

Kalyani Mathivanan v. K.V. Jeyaraj

11 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that UGC Regulations, 2010 are mandatory and prevail over conflicting State University Acts, setting aside the appointment of a Vice-Chancellor who did not meet prescribed academic qualifications.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant UGC Regulations 2010 Vice-Chancellor appointment Madurai Kamaraj University Act 1965 mandatory qualifications

Edward v. Inspector of Police, Aandimadam Police Station

11 Mar 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld conviction based on sole reliable eyewitness testimony despite absence of medical evidence, dismissing the appeal against conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole eyewitness testimony reliability of witness medical evidence Section 302 IPC

Ashok v. State of Maharashtra

11 Mar 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction for murder based on insufficient prosecution evidence and clarified that the last seen together rule does not shift the burden of proof onto the accused unless the prosecution first proves its case beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen together rule burden of proof circumstantial evidence Section 106 Indian Evidence Act

Pawan Kumar @ Monu Mittal v. State of Uttar Pradesh

11 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions based on circumstantial evidence and admissible discoveries under Section 27, dismissing appeals challenging the inadmissibility of confessions under Section 25 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant confession Section 25 Indian Evidence Act Section 27 Indian Evidence Act circumstantial evidence

Union of India v. Major General Shri Kant Sharma

11 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that High Courts retain jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain writ petitions against Armed Forces Tribunal orders despite the statutory appeal mechanism to the Supreme Court, as judicial review is a basic constitutional feature.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Article 226 jurisdiction Judicial review Section 30 appeal

Grah Rakshak, Home Guards Wel. Asso v. State of H.P.

11 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Home Guards in Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and Delhi are volunteers not entitled to regularization or regular pay, but directed States to pay duty allowances equivalent to minimum police pay.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Home Guards volunteer service regularization duty allowance

Jiban Krishna Mondal v. State of West Bengal

10 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that West Bengal Home Guards are volunteers without employment status and denied their claim for regularization and pay parity with police personnel.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant West Bengal Home Guards voluntary service master-servant relationship regularization of service

Harmony Innovation Shipping Ltd. v. Gupta Coal India Ltd. & Anr.

10 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts have jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for arbitrations held outside India unless the parties expressly or impliedly exclude Part I by agreement, and that the Bharat Aluminium Co. decision applies prospectively.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 International commercial arbitration Jurisdiction

Md. Ali @ Guddu v. State of U.P.

10 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside convictions for kidnapping and rape due to unexplained delay in FIR, doubtful prosecutrix testimony, and unimpressive medical evidence, emphasizing the appellate court's duty to independently reappraise evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant delay in FIR prosecutrix testimony rape kidnapping

Gurjit Singh v. State of Haryana

10 Mar 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting their plea of self-defence and affirming the reliability of eyewitness testimony including that of relatives.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder self-defence sudden provocation Section 302 IPC

Bhargava & Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

10 Mar 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an Award predates the 2013 Act by five years and possession or compensation is not completed, and that this statutory right cannot be retrospectively overridden by an Ordinance.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) lapse of acquisition

Ambikapathi Ammal & Anr. v. Sri Kandaswamy Koil by its Executive Officer Thiruporur

10 Mar 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court remanded a land dispute for fresh adjudication, holding that ownership and occupancy rights under Patta and estate laws require clear evidence beyond mere documentary descriptions.

property remanded Significant Patta No.1 Mirasidar Tamil Nadu Estates Land Act 1908 Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act 1948

Premier Breweries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax

10 Mar 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision denying deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act for commission payments, clarifying the scope of the High Court's reference jurisdiction under Section 256(2).

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 37 deduction Section 256(2) reference jurisdiction commission payments

Vijay Pal v. State (GNCT) of Delhi

10 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible oral dying declaration, corroborative medical evidence, and rejected the accused's alibi plea for lack of proof.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC alibi burn injuries

Satish Kumar Jayanti Lal Dabgar v. State of Gujarat

10 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence for rape of a minor girl under 16 years, affirming that her consent is legally immaterial and emphasizing deterrent sentencing for such heinous crimes.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape of minor consent immaterial Section 375 IPC kidnapping minor