Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Dashmesh Educational Society v. Punjab Urban Development Authority

25 Mar 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh determination of whether the land is forest land requiring central approval, holding that deemed sanction under the 1952 Act does not apply without proper application and that delay bars challenge to land preservation notifications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Punjab New Capital Periphery Control Act, 1952 deemed sanction forest land Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

Agricultural Income Tax Officer & Anr. v. Goodricke Group Ltd. & Anr.

25 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a retrospective amendment validating a tax levy nullifies prior judgments invalidating the levy, but interest on the tax is payable only from the date of assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant retrospective amendment rural employment cess education cess refund with interest

PVR Limited v. State of Karnataka

25 Mar 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the State Government cannot mandate exclusive exhibition of Films Division documentary films without statutory approval and set aside interim directions imposing such conditions on theater licenses.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Karnataka Cinemas Regulation Act Film Advisory Board State Government directions Documentary films

Fortis Hospital Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, Import

24 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that customs duty under Section 125(2) is payable only if the importer exercises the option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation, and a demand for duty not mentioned in the show cause notice is unsustainable.

customs appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 124 Section 125 confiscation

Panna Lal v. State of M.P.

23 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder and related offences, rejecting their claim of private defence, and separated the juvenile appellant's case for trial under the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed right of private defence murder juvenile offender Indian Penal Code Sections 147, 148, 302/149, 323/149

Deepa @ Deep Chand & Anr. v. State of Haryana

23 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for murder based on reliable eye-witness evidence and medical proof, dismissing their appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed murder eye-witness testimony Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC

Ramesh v. Harbans Nagpal

23 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that a decree must be executed strictly as passed without introducing extraneous details, setting aside the High Court's order directing execution based on a site plan not part of the decree.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mandatory injunction ex parte decree Section 151 CPC Order IX Rule 13 CPC

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Rakesh Mishra

23 Mar 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court restored the framing of charges against municipal officers accused of corruption in granting illegal building permissions, holding that the High Court erred in quashing charges at the pre-trial stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Prevention of Corruption Act criminal conspiracy

M/S. MILLENIUM WIRES (P) LTD. v. THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.

23 Mar 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit seeking injunction against a bank honoring Letters of Credit, holding that injunctions are only granted in cases of clear fraud known to the bank or irreparable injury, and vague allegations do not disclose a cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Letter of Credit Injunction Order VII Rule 11 CPC Cause of Action

Kedari Lal v. State of M.P.

23 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court acquitted a public servant accused of possessing disproportionate assets by holding that duly disclosed and lawfully received gifts, loans, and inheritance constitute known sources of income under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 known sources of income M.P. Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1965

AVAS AYUKT,U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & ORS v. BHAGWAN TIWARI & ANR

20 Mar 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court directed the respondent to pay the balance amount for a housing scheme flat allotment and the authority to deliver possession thereafter, disposing of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed housing scheme allotment payment possession

Anirudh Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

20 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the MCD's retrospective Regularisation Certificate permitting a Pathological Lab in a residential building, holding it illegal for violating Master Plan and environmental laws and affirming the appellant's locus standi to file public interest litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Regularisation Certificate Mixed Land Use Master Plan Delhi 2001 MPD 2021

Dhropadabai and Others v. M/s. Technocraft Toolings

19 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that legal heirs of an employee insured under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 cannot claim compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for death occurring in the course of employment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 53 ESI Act insured person

Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary v. Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited

19 Mar 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that cooperative societies, as constitutional democratic institutions under the 97th Amendment, permit removal of elected office bearers by no-confidence motion even absent express statutory provisions, and upheld the appellant's removal accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Cooperative societies No-confidence motion 97th Amendment Democratic functioning

HMT Watches Ltd. v. M.A. Abida & Anr.

19 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant · (2014) 9 SCALE 437

The Supreme Court held that disputed factual defences cannot be grounds for quashing criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act at the threshold and restored the proceedings for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Stop payment instruction Section 482 CrPC

Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat

19 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court referred the question of anticipatory bail and custodial interrogation of trustees accused of criminal misconduct to a larger Bench, emphasizing the need to balance liberty with effective investigation.

criminal other Significant anticipatory bail custodial interrogation fundamental right to liberty criminal breach of trust

Priyanka Srivastava and Another v. State of U.P. and Others

19 Mar 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed FIR registered without proper judicial scrutiny under Section 156(3) CrPC against bank officials, emphasizing protection under Section 32 of the SARFAESI Act and curbing abuse of criminal process by borrowers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC SARFAESI Act Section 32 SARFAESI Act FIR registration

Tamilnadu Terminated Full Time Temporary LIC Employees Association v. Life Insurance Corporation of India

18 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the binding NIT Awards directing absorption of temporary LIC employees remain operative and restored the CGIT Award granting their absorption, setting aside the High Court's contrary order based on a compromise and subsequent schemes.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 absorption of temporary employees National Industrial Tribunal Awards Life Insurance Corporation of India

M/s. Satnam Overseas Ltd v. Commnr. Of Central Excise, New Delhi

18 Mar 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that mixing raw rice with dehydrated vegetables and spices does not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, and the product is exempt from excise duty under Heading 11.01.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture essential character test excise duty classification

Surti Gupta v. United India Insurance Co. & Anr.

17 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded to the appellant in a motor accident death claim by applying correct principles for calculating loss of dependency, future prospects, and other damages, and awarded interest at 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects