Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Raja @ Rajinder v. State of Haryana

10 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and admissible discovery under Section 27, dismissing the appellant's challenge to his murder conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement

State of Rajasthan v. Surja Ram

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction of Surja Ram, holding that contradictions in cross-examination did not absolve him of equal participation in the crime under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC Section 34 IPC murder

State of Rajasthan v. Sampat Ram and others

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and insufficient identification evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness identification benefit of doubt unlawful assembly Section 302 IPC

Swapna Sukumar & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

10 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court dismissed I.A. No. 6/2015 as not pressed and allowed I.A. No. 7/2015 in terms of prayer 'a' in Civil Appeal Nos. 226-227/2015.

civil other Procedural interlocutory application I.A. No. 6/2015 I.A. No. 7/2015 civil appeal

Ms. S v. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that identification of an accused by a prosecutrix for the first time in court is reliable and can sustain conviction despite absence of a test identification parade, allowing the appeal and convicting the accused under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identification parade sexual assault prosecutrix identification test identification parade

MD. JAMILUDDIN NASIR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

10 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed certain Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions related to criminal appeals from West Bengal and directed necessary corrections.

criminal other Procedural Criminal Appeal Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Supreme Court of India Order

Payal Chawla Singh v. The Coca-Cola Co. & Anr.

10 Apr 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner’s employment contract did not incorporate the arbitration clause of the "solutions programme" and dismissed her petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement employment contract solutions programme Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Mahadeo Gadekar

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the reliability of a medically certified dying declaration to convict accused of murder and outraging modesty, overturning the High Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 354 IPC burn injuries

Ranga Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

10 Apr 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Lokayukta's investigation and report against a former minister, ruling that procedural defects were cured and the Lokayukta acted within its discretionary powers under the U.P. Lokayukta Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act complaint maintainability affidavit requirement

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra Thr. STF. CBI, Mumbai

09 Apr 2015 · Anil R. Dave; J. Chelameswar; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition filed by Yakub Abdul Razak Memon, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified interference with the earlier judgment in the criminal appeal.

criminal petition_dismissed review petition Supreme Court criminal appeal error apparent on face of record

Yunus Zia v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

09 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the Lokayukta Police's jurisdiction to suo-motu register and investigate an FIR against a non-public servant under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, dismissing the appeal but directing transfer of investigation to the State's Corps of Detectives for impartial inquiry.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta Act, 1984 suo-motu FIR jurisdiction of Lokayukta Police Section 482 CrPC

Gauri Shankar Pd. Rai v. Sajal Chakroborty

09 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court directed full compliance with its earlier order by regularising petitioners' services from 1981, holding partial compliance insufficient and warning of contempt for wilful disobedience.

administrative other Significant regularisation of service contempt of court wilful disobedience Junior Engineers

P. Pramila and others v. State of Karnataka and another

09 Apr 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that criminal complaints under the Air Act must be filed by the Board or its authorized officer, and unauthorized delegation of this power invalidates the proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 Section 43(1) delegation of authority complaint filing

Ravinder Kaur v. Anil Kumar

09 Apr 2015 · J. S. Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that discharge without trial does not bar a subsequent complaint under different offences and that setting aside an ex-parte divorce decree negates deceit under Section 493 IPC, allowing compounding of Section 494 IPC offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 300 CrPC Section 493 IPC Section 494 IPC ex-parte divorce decree

M/S CHENNAI PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TAMIL NADU-I

09 Apr 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that income from letting out properties is business income when letting is the company’s main business activity, reversing the High Court’s contrary ruling.

tax appeal_allowed Significant income classification business income income from house property letting out property

Election Commission of India v. Bajrang Bahadur Singh

09 Apr 2015 · Chelameswar; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

A sitting legislator entering into a subsisting government contract incurs immediate disqualification under Section 9A of the R.P. Act, causing automatic vacation of the seat, and the Governor's declaration of such disqualification is final but subject to limited judicial review.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Section 9A Representation of the People Act disqualification of legislator subsisting government contract Article 192 Constitution of India

Jodhan v. State of M.P.

08 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 13 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, affirming that the appellate court can reverse acquittal if the trial court's view is perverse and that credible testimony of injured interested witnesses suffices for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Acquittal Appellate jurisdiction Unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC

Major Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab

08 Apr 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 304B IPC due to lack of evidence proving cruelty or harassment soon before the death in connection with dowry demand.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC cruelty and harassment demand for dowry

Rajan v. Joseph & Ors.

08 Apr 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 304A IPC for accidental death without negligence but directed compensation to the deceased's family under its constitutional jurisdiction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304A IPC rash and negligent act quashing of criminal proceedings compensation

Voltas Ltd. v. State of Gujarat

08 Apr 2015 · Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that a works contract involving both fabrication and installation of a water chilling plant falls under the lower 5% composition tax rate for plant and machinery under Gujarat Sales Tax law, overruling the High Court's classification under the higher 15% rate for air-conditioners.

tax appeal_allowed Significant works contract composition tax fabrication installation