Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

State of M.P. v. Mala Banerjee

17 Mar 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld teachers' entitlement to the Kramonnati Scheme benefits from 1999, ruling the State's deferment to 2003 arbitrary and discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Kramonnati Scheme pay scale revision Madhya Pradesh Revision of Pay Rules, 1990 arbitrariness

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. v. INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CORPN.

17 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that minutes of a government meeting cannot override statutory regulations unless sanctioned as a valid executive order under constitutional and statutory procedures, setting aside the High Court's order directing release of detained aircraft.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Airport Authority of India Act, 1994 Regulation 10 Minutes of meeting Transaction of Business Rules, 1961

M. Mahendar Kumar v. M. Mani & Ors.

17 Mar 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order transferring investigation after chargesheet filing, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be exercised to order further investigation when specific provisions exist and material facts are suppressed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. chargesheet further investigation

Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand

17 Mar 2015 · H.L. Dattu; Madan B. Lokur; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that royalty on coal is payable on Run-of-Mine coal at the pit-head from August 1998 to September 2000 and thereafter on processed coal removed from the leased area as per Rule 64B and 64C of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960.

tax appeal_allowed Significant royalty coal mining Run-of-Mine coal beneficiation

Ram Singh v. Union of India

17 Mar 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the Union Government's inclusion of the Jat community in the Central OBC list, holding that the Government may override the NCBC's advice upon recording strong and compelling reasons based on relevant material.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant National Commission for Backward Classes Other Backward Classes Jat community Reservation

Jyoti Limited & Others v. Bharat J. Patel & Others

17 Mar 2015 · Chelameswar; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a civil suit seeking interim relief to facilitate an Extraordinary General Meeting is maintainable despite alternative statutory remedies and set aside inconsistent interim orders of the High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant maintainability of suit Companies Act, 2013 Company Law Board interim injunction

Vesa Holdings P. Ltd. v. State of Kerala

17 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a company and its directors for alleged cheating, holding that mere breach of contract without fraudulent intention at inception does not constitute a criminal offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC cheating fraudulent intention breach of contract

Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax & Ors. v. M/S. Netley 'B' Estate & Ors.

17 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of a retrospective amendment deeming dissolved firms to continue to exist for agricultural income tax assessment, distinguishing it from prior cases invalidating retrospective tax laws that nullify judicial decisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant retrospective amendment agricultural income tax dissolved firm legal fiction

Vikram Cement & Anr v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

17 Mar 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a government notification denying refund of excess entry tax paid at higher rates despite retrospective reduction violates Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution, entitling taxpayers to refunds.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Entry Tax Article 14 Article 265 Retrospective Taxation

Abdul Razzaq v. State of U.P.

16 Mar 2015 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; T. S. Thakur

The Supreme Court allowed a juvenile claim raised post-conviction, set aside the sentence of life imprisonment, and ordered release while maintaining the conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenility claim Section 7-A Juvenile Justice Act retrospective application

R. Dineshkumar @ Deena v. State

16 Mar 2015 · Chelameswar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a witness's compelled incriminating testimony is protected under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, barring prosecution based solely on such evidence and refusing to summon him as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC Section 132 Evidence Act compelled testimony immunity from prosecution

P. Suseela v. University Grants Commission

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.F. Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's power to mandate NET as a minimum eligibility for university teaching posts, validating UGC regulations and rejecting exemptions for pre-2009 degree holders.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant University Grants Commission Act, 1956 Section 20 UGC Act Section 26 UGC Act NET eligibility

Taramani Parakh v. State of M.P.

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC for dowry harassment cannot be quashed at the threshold merely on omnibus allegations and must be allowed to proceed if a prima facie case is made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings dowry harassment Section 498-A IPC

Ramdev Food Products Private Limited v. State of Gujarat

16 Mar 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that Magistrates must apply mind before ordering investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, police cannot arrest during inquiry under Section 202, and the Magistrate rightly proceeded under Section 202 in a primarily civil dispute involving forgery allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC Section 202 CrPC police arrest powers investigation

M/S. QUEEN’S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that incidental surplus does not disqualify an educational institution from income tax exemption under Section 10(23C) if the predominant object is educational and not profit-making.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 10(23C)(iiiad) Section 10(23C)(vi) Income Tax exemption educational institution

S. Sridhar v. State of Tamil Nadu

13 Mar 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court directed the respondent-Corporation to consider the regularisation application of shops constructed beyond the sanctioned plan within three months and restrained demolition until the decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant regularisation of unauthorized construction sanctioned plan bye-laws demolition stay

Tukaram Dnyaneshwar Patil v. State of Maharashtra

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC but enhanced the sentence to five years rigorous imprisonment, emphasizing proportionate sentencing and deterrence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC culpable homicide murder

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Chennai-III v. Grasim Industries

13 Mar 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies to refund claims of excise duty on capital goods used captively, requiring proof that the duty incidence was not passed on through product costing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of unjust enrichment refund of excise duty capital goods captive consumption

Amarkant Rai v. State of Bihar & Ors.

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed retrospective regularization of a long-serving daily wage employee appointed irregularly but not illegally, applying the exception in Umadevi’s case for appointments exceeding ten years.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization irregular appointment illegal appointment Bihar State Universities Act, 1976

Sujitendra Nath Singh Roy v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

13 Mar 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226/227 are maintainable against a tribunal's refusal to initiate contempt proceedings, affirming High Courts' writ jurisdiction over such tribunals.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 Article 227 contempt proceedings