Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Vesa Holdings P. Ltd. v. State of Kerala

17 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a company and its directors for alleged cheating, holding that mere breach of contract without fraudulent intention at inception does not constitute a criminal offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC cheating fraudulent intention breach of contract

Assistant Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax & Ors. v. M/S. Netley 'B' Estate & Ors.

17 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of a retrospective amendment deeming dissolved firms to continue to exist for agricultural income tax assessment, distinguishing it from prior cases invalidating retrospective tax laws that nullify judicial decisions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant retrospective amendment agricultural income tax dissolved firm legal fiction

Vikram Cement & Anr v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors

17 Mar 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a government notification denying refund of excess entry tax paid at higher rates despite retrospective reduction violates Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution, entitling taxpayers to refunds.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Entry Tax Article 14 Article 265 Retrospective Taxation

Abdul Razzaq v. State of U.P.

16 Mar 2015 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; T. S. Thakur
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed a juvenile claim raised post-conviction, set aside the sentence of life imprisonment, and ordered release while maintaining the conviction under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenile justice juvenility claim Section 7-A Juvenile Justice Act retrospective application

R. Dineshkumar @ Deena v. State

16 Mar 2015 · Chelameswar; C. Nagappan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a witness's compelled incriminating testimony is protected under Section 132 of the Evidence Act, barring prosecution based solely on such evidence and refusing to summon him as an additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 CrPC Section 132 Evidence Act compelled testimony immunity from prosecution

P. Suseela v. University Grants Commission

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.F. Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's power to mandate NET as a minimum eligibility for university teaching posts, validating UGC regulations and rejecting exemptions for pre-2009 degree holders.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant University Grants Commission Act, 1956 Section 20 UGC Act Section 26 UGC Act NET eligibility

Taramani Parakh v. State of M.P.

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC for dowry harassment cannot be quashed at the threshold merely on omnibus allegations and must be allowed to proceed if a prima facie case is made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings dowry harassment Section 498-A IPC

Ramdev Food Products Private Limited v. State of Gujarat

16 Mar 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that Magistrates must apply mind before ordering investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, police cannot arrest during inquiry under Section 202, and the Magistrate rightly proceeded under Section 202 in a primarily civil dispute involving forgery allegations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC Section 202 CrPC police arrest powers investigation

M/S. QUEEN’S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

16 Mar 2015 · T.S. Thakur; R.F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that incidental surplus does not disqualify an educational institution from income tax exemption under Section 10(23C) if the predominant object is educational and not profit-making.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 10(23C)(iiiad) Section 10(23C)(vi) Income Tax exemption educational institution

S. Sridhar v. State of Tamil Nadu

13 Mar 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court directed the respondent-Corporation to consider the regularisation application of shops constructed beyond the sanctioned plan within three months and restrained demolition until the decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant regularisation of unauthorized construction sanctioned plan bye-laws demolition stay

Tukaram Dnyaneshwar Patil v. State of Maharashtra

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 304 Part-II IPC but enhanced the sentence to five years rigorous imprisonment, emphasizing proportionate sentencing and deterrence.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC culpable homicide murder

Commnr. Of Central Excise, Chennai-III v. Grasim Industries

13 Mar 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment applies to refund claims of excise duty on capital goods used captively, requiring proof that the duty incidence was not passed on through product costing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of unjust enrichment refund of excise duty capital goods captive consumption

Amarkant Rai v. State of Bihar & Ors.

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed retrospective regularization of a long-serving daily wage employee appointed irregularly but not illegally, applying the exception in Umadevi’s case for appointments exceeding ten years.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization irregular appointment illegal appointment Bihar State Universities Act, 1976

Sujitendra Nath Singh Roy v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

13 Mar 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions under Articles 226/227 are maintainable against a tribunal's refusal to initiate contempt proceedings, affirming High Courts' writ jurisdiction over such tribunals.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 Article 227 contempt proceedings

SHASHIKALA & ORS. v. GANGALAKSHMAMMA & ANR.

13 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 168

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by taking the higher income of the deceased, applying deductions and multiplier, awarded substantial conventional damages, and referred the question of future prospects addition for self-employed persons to a larger Bench.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation future prospects self-employed

M/s. Muneer Enterprises v. M/s Ramgad Minerals and Mining Ltd.

12 Mar 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that surrender of a mining lease is effective only after mandatory 12 months' notice and acceptance by the State, and non-compliance with Forest Act approvals does not render the lease void ab initio but can be regularized by ex post facto approval.

property appeal_dismissed Significant mining lease surrender Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 Section 2 approval

BARANAGORE JUTE FACTORY PLC. v. SHREEKISHAN OMPRAKASH

12 Mar 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's order restraining withdrawal of deposited funds pending disposal of all related applications in a company liquidation matter and directed expeditious disposal of pending applications.

civil appeal_dismissed company liquidation deposit with Registrar withdrawal of funds pending applications

M/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. v. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

12 Mar 2015 · A. K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Electro Deposition Coating on inputs does not amount to manufacture attracting excise duty beyond MODVAT credit reversal, allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the differential duty demand.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture processing value addition excise duty

Charu Kishor Mehta v. Joint Charity Commissioner, Greater Bombay Region & Ors.

12 Mar 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of trustees' delegation of powers to a Managing Trustee under the Trust Deed and dismissed the appeal challenging the non-imposition of penalties on co-trustees for alleged mismanagement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant public charitable trust delegation of powers Managing Trustee Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950

Kalyani Mathivanan v. K.V. Jeyaraj

11 Mar 2015 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that UGC Regulations, 2010 are mandatory and prevail over conflicting State University Acts, setting aside the appointment of a Vice-Chancellor who did not meet prescribed academic qualifications.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant UGC Regulations 2010 Vice-Chancellor appointment Madurai Kamaraj University Act 1965 mandatory qualifications