Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

SEEMA RANI v. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 192
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that major sons and married daughters residing with the deceased and not fully self-sufficient are dependents entitled to compensation including future prospects, enhancing the award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dependents future prospects compensation

NUR AHAMAD ABDULSAB KANAVI v. ABDUL MUNAF

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 191
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by fixing the claimant's income at Rs. 10,000 per month and recognizing 100% permanent disability, applying established principles for calculating just compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation permanent disability monthly income

State of Uttarakhand v. Sanjay Ram Tamta

11 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 187

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused husband in a dowry death case due to failure of the prosecution to prove demand for dowry and connected cruelty, emphasizing strict proof requirements under Section 304B IPC and cautious appellate interference with acquittals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304B IPC dowry death Section 113B Evidence Act presumption of dowry death

SANJAY RAJPOOT v. RAM SINGH

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 188

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by correctly assessing the claimant's age, disability at 90%, and applying the appropriate multiplier, ensuring just reparation for loss of earning capacity.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation functional disability notional income

Akula Raghuram v. State of Andhra Pradesh

11 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 185

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of abduction charges under Section 366-A IPC due to lack of conclusive proof of the victim's minority and inconsistencies in prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 366-A IPC abduction minor consent

C.S. UMESH v. T.V. GANGARAJU

11 Feb 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 298

The Supreme Court held that unilateral oral corrections of judicial orders without notice violate natural justice and must be set aside, restoring the matter for fresh hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant natural justice modification of judicial order oral mention review petition

Siba Nial @ Trilochan v. State of Odisha

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 206
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction due to discrepancies in witness testimony and inconclusive forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder Section 302 IPC Section 109 IPC reasonable doubt

Vijayalaxmi @ Roopa v. Shenoy

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 186
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Income Tax Returns are valid proof of income for motor accident compensation claims and enhanced the awarded compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Returns Motor Accident Claim Compensation Calculation Future Prospects

Karuna Parmar v. Prakash Sinha & Ors.

11 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 1244
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including potential income, awarding reasonable medical expenses, and applying minimum wages for the deceased child's compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation earning capacity medical expenses minimum wages

Naushey Ali & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

11 Feb 2025 · K.V. Viswanathan; S.V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 182

The Supreme Court held that criminal proceedings under Section 307 IPC can be quashed on compromise if evidence does not support the charge and continuation would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings compounding of offences

Mehatar v. State of Maharashtra

11 Feb 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 216

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to unreliable sole witness testimony lacking corroboration, emphasizing the necessity of corroboration when witness evidence is partly doubtful.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole witness testimony interested witness corroboration Indian Penal Code Sections 147, 148, 452, 302, 149

Union of India & Others v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Another

11 Feb 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 181

The Supreme Court held that the power to tax lotteries lies exclusively with the State Legislature, invalidating Parliament's imposition of service tax on lottery distributors acting as agents of the State.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax lottery agency relationship principal-agent

VASANT @ GIRISH AKBARASAB SANAVALE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

11 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 221

The Supreme Court upheld the mother-in-law's conviction for murder based on reliable dying declaration evidence but acquitted the husband due to lack of proof of his participation or common intention under Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 34 IPC common intention participation in offence

Sushant Sharma v. U.T. Chandigarh & Ors.

10 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 204

The Supreme Court allowed a father's appeal to interact with his son, imposed restrictions on taking the child abroad, protected the child's assets, and appointed a Court Commissioner to ensure safety measures during ongoing guardianship proceedings.

family appeal_allowed Significant parental rights child custody interaction with child interim order

Hansraj v. State of Chhattisgarh

10 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 178

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to inconclusive circumstantial evidence and failure to exclude reasonable doubt, emphasizing strict adherence to the principles governing circumstantial proof.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC murder last seen theory

B.V. RAM KUMAR v. STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANOTHER

10 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 194
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a director for alleged verbal reprimand and PPE negligence, holding no prima facie case under Sections 269, 270, and 504 IPC was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 504 IPC quashing of criminal proceedings intentional insult

AC CHOKSHI SHARE BROKER PRIVATE LIMITED v. JATIN PRATAP DESAI & ANR.

10 Feb 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 174
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the arbitral tribunal had jurisdiction over the husband based on an oral contract of joint liability under BSE Bye-laws and that the award was neither perverse nor patently illegal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration jurisdiction joint and several liability BSE Bye-laws Section 34 Arbitration Act

Ravi v. State of Punjab

10 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 170

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence and emphasized cautious application of Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 106 Indian Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC benefit of doubt

PRAKASH CHAND SHARMA v. RAMBABU SAINI

10 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 180
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the Medical Board’s 100% disability assessment and enhanced motor accident compensation to Rs.48.7 lakhs including attendant charges and pain and suffering, holding that expert medical opinion must be accepted unless properly challenged.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability Medical Board opinion attendant charges

Amrit Yadav v. The State of Jharkhand

10 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 176
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a recruitment advertisement lacking transparency and reservation details is void, quashed all appointments made thereunder, and directed fresh recruitment compliant with constitutional mandates.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant public employment recruitment advertisement Articles 14 and 16 reservation