Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

KIRSHNA TEXPORT & CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. v. ILA A. AGRAWAL & ORS.

06 May 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that separate statutory notices under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are not required to be issued to company directors before prosecuting them under Section 141, overruling contrary High Court decisions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 Section 141 Dishonour of cheque

K.S. Ravindran v. Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

06 May 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination without enquiry entitles the employee to reinstatement with back-wages unless the employer proves gainful employment during the period.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination of service domestic enquiry principles of natural justice back-wages

State of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Venkateshwarlu

06 May 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a Sub Registrar for accepting bribe, holding that recovery of tainted money and corroborated eyewitness testimony suffice to prove demand and acceptance under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 20

State of U.P. v. Damodar & Anr.

06 May 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of leave to appeal and remanding the case for fresh consideration of evidence in a dowry death involving suspicious burn injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry harassment burn injuries Section 498A IPC Section 304B IPC

IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD v. M/S VINAY HEAVY EQUIPMENTS

06 May 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award holding the main contractor primarily liable to pay the subcontractor despite 'back-to-back' subcontract clauses, affirming the principle of privity of contract and binding effect of admissions in arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant back-to-back contract subcontractor liability privity of contract arbitration award

State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Mineral Supply Co. Pvt. Ltd.

06 May 2015 · M. Y. Eqbal; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that renewal of lease is a fresh grant subject to prospective terms including salami payment, and that land held within ceiling limits under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act cannot be resumed under the Estates Acquisition Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953 West Bengal Land Reforms Act lease renewal salami payment

State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kesavapatnam China Swamy

06 May 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a public servant for accepting bribe, rejecting the High Court's acquittal based on unsubstantiated doubts about trap proceedings and evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 bribery phenolphthalein test trap proceedings

M/S. COAL HANDLERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

05 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that services limited to liaison and supervision without actual clearing and forwarding operations do not qualify as Clearing and Forwarding Agent services liable to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service Tax Finance Act 1994 Section 65(25)

M/S. SECURE METERS LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

05 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that LCDs imported as parts of electricity meters must be classified under the specific tariff heading 9013.80, not as parts under 9028.90, applying Chapter Note 2(a) of the Customs Tariff.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs classification Liquid Crystal Display Chapter Heading 9013.80 Chapter Heading 9028.90

M/S. B.P.L. LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

05 May 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that defibrillators primarily for external use with optional internal paddles do not qualify for excise duty exemption under Notifications No. 8/96 and 4/97, dismissing the appellant's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Excise Exemption Notification Defibrillator Internal Use

K. Radhika v. T. Rajya Laxmi & Others

05 May 2015 · Chelameswar; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that preference to candidates with higher shorthand qualification in recruitment is mandatory only if suitable candidates are available, and set aside the High Court's quashing of the appellant's selection for lack of such finding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recruitment notification qualification clause English shorthand higher grade selection process

Rajasthan Housing Board v. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd

01 May 2015 · H. L. Dattu; A. K. Sikri; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that land transactions by Scheduled Caste Khatedars to a non-Scheduled Caste juristic person are void under section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, barring the Society's claim to compensation and allotment of developed land in land acquisition proceedings.

property appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 Rajasthan Tenancy Act section 42 Scheduled Caste land transfer void transactions

ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION v. UNION OF INDIA

01 May 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that assets of statutory bodies created before state bifurcation must be equitably apportioned between successor States as per the Reorganisation Act, setting aside the exclusive claim of Telangana over APSC's assets located in Hyderabad.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 State bifurcation Apportionment of assets and liabilities Section 75

Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. v. Harisingh

30 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the reinstatement of a workman with 50% back wages, holding that dismissal was disproportionate to the partially proved misconduct and that the Labour Court rightly interfered with the punishment under Section 107 of the MPIR Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant domestic enquiry go slow work industrial dispute proportionality of punishment

Government Mohindra Instt. of Information Technology v. All India Council For Technical Education

30 Apr 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court quashed AICTE's rejection of a government college's application to start an MCA course due to violation of natural justice and directed reconsideration with due regard to removal of deficiencies.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice technical education All India Council for Technical Education MCA course

M/S ARIANE ORGACHEM PVT. LTD. v. WYETH EMPLOYEES UNION

29 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan · (1979) 4 SCC 176
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s quashing of the refusal to refer an industrial dispute involving alleged forced voluntary retirement to the Industrial Tribunal, directing proper reference and adjudication.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10(1)(d) Voluntary Retirement Scheme Industrial Tribunal

M/S. ESCORTS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD

29 Apr 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that transmission assemblies are excisable intermediate goods known to the market but quashed extended limitation demands due to absence of willful suppression by the appellants.

tax appeal_allowed Significant excise duty transmission assembly intermediate product marketability

Pradip Nanjee Gala v. Sales Tax Officer

29 Apr 2015 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde; Arun Mishra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, partners are jointly and severally liable for firm’s tax dues and no valid settlement can absolve an individual partner outside the statutory provisions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 joint and several liability settlement power of remission

Mahavir Prasad v. Dalbir Singh

29 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a fraudulent appointment and set aside the retrospective appointment of a non-selected candidate, emphasizing that vacancies must be filled from the original merit list and denying relief to a barred claimant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appointment fraudulent certificate experience qualification select list

HIMALAYAN COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY v. BALWAN SINGH

29 Apr 2015 · H.L. Dattu; S.A. Bobde; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that unauthorized concessions made by counsel do not bind the client and set aside the Writ Court's directions issued on such concessions in a cooperative society membership expulsion dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Article 227 concession by counsel authorization