Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

K.B. Ramachandra Raje Urs v. State of Karnataka

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court invalidated land acquisition under the City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 due to procedural non-compliance but allowed partial retention of land by the allottee considering equitable factors and directed compensation to rightful owners.

property appeal_allowed Significant City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 land acquisition development scheme government sanction

Bimla Devi v. Rajesh Singh & Anr

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld life sentences for four accused in a double murder family feud case, acquitted one accused due to lack of evidence, and declined to impose the death penalty, emphasizing benefit of doubt and procedural fairness.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt FIR delay inquest report overwriting rarest of rare

Narender Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld convictions based on a reliable dying declaration recorded despite minor procedural defects, rejecting alibi and false implication pleas in a custodial burning death case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 330 IPC police custody

State of Maharashtra v. Hemant Kawadu Chauriwal

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder and cruelty case due to unreliable dying declaration, inadequate proof of letters, and defective investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt cruelty burn injuries

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India

16 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian... · (1993) 4 SCC 441

The Supreme Court held that the executive, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, must finalize the Memorandum of Procedure for judicial appointments, incorporating transparency and accountability measures, while the Court provided broad guidelines to improve the collegium system.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant collegium system judicial appointments Memorandum of Procedure transparency

State of Punjab v. Bittu & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on incomplete and doubtful circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder hostile witnesses benefit of doubt

Gian Chand v. Gurlabh Singh

15 Dec 2015 · Arun Mishra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held the bus driver and owner liable for rash and negligent driving causing death in an accident, awarding enhanced compensation to the claimants and setting aside prior findings of no liability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 rash and negligent driving compensation

LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUST v. MAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS

15 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the single member Waqf Tribunal retains jurisdiction over waqf property disputes until a three member Tribunal is constituted by the State Government, rejecting the High Court's order transferring jurisdiction to civil courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Waqf Act, 1995 Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 Section 83(4) single member Tribunal

Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University

15 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a deemed university performing public functions is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, allowing the appellant's writ petition to be maintainable and remanding the matter for merits consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 deemed university public function

M/S MASTER TOURS AND TRAVELS v. THE CHAIRMAN, SHRI AMARNATH JI SHRINE BOARD

15 Dec 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a clause providing for final decision by a designated official is not an arbitration clause and directed the dispute to be resolved by the Chief Executive Officer within a time frame.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant dispute resolution clause arbitration clause interpretation of contract final decision by official

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore v. M/S. TVS Motors Company Ltd.

15 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that pre-delivery inspection and free after sales service charges incurred by dealers but not recovered from them by manufacturers are not includible in the assessable value for excise duty under amended Section 4 of the Central Excise Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant assessable value pre-delivery inspection charges after sales service charges transaction value

M/S GUJARAT INDUSTRIES & ORS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE-I

14 Dec 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that cold-rolling of hot-rolled stainless steel strips amounts to manufacture attracting central excise duty and upheld the extended limitation period for duty recovery.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant cold-rolling manufacture central excise duty Section 2(f)(i) Central Excise Act

Calcutta Stock Exchange v. BLB Limited

11 Dec 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal seeking to summon irrelevant documents in a recovery suit, affirming that civil courts should not entertain collateral investigations and emphasizing the necessity of document relevance under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XVI Rule 1 CPC relevance of documents collateral investigation SEBI Act Section 11C

Shakti Kumar Gupta v. State of Jammu and Kashmir and another

11 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the premature retirement of a judicial officer despite setting aside an adverse Annual Confidential Report based solely on non-submission of a self-assessment report, emphasizing the discretionary power of the High Court to retire officers in public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant premature retirement Annual Confidential Report self-assessment report Higher Judicial Service Rules

Rajbala & Others v. State of Haryana & Others

10 Dec 2015 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of educational and other disqualifications for contesting Panchayat elections under the Haryana Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2015, affirming the State Legislature's competence to prescribe reasonable qualifications consistent with Article 14.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Panchayati Raj Article 14 Right to contest election Disqualifications

Nanuram Mohanlal Varma v. Divisional Controller

10 Dec 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the appellant to return 50% of back wages to the respondent within four weeks without interest, imposing 6% interest if delayed, thereby partially allowing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed back wages repayment interest civil appeal

Bipinchandra Gamanlal Chokshi v. State of Gujarat

10 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a detenu released immediately after Emergency revocation retains the right to challenge his detention order, allowing such challenge despite prior non-action during Emergency, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant COFEPOSA Act Section 12A Preventive Detention Emergency

Mahendra Singh v. State of Rajasthan; Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan

09 Dec 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court set aside Ram Singh's conviction due to lack of eyewitness evidence and granted Mahendra Singh the benefit of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, modifying his sentence while maintaining conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 Section 20 Juvenile Justice Act juvenility determination conviction under IPC Sections 148, 302, 149

Shobha Ram Raturi v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited

09 Dec 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that an employee whose premature retirement was quashed is entitled to back wages for the period restrained from work, rejecting the employer's plea of "no work, no pay."

civil appeal_allowed Significant premature retirement back wages no work no pay continuous service

Premium Global Securities Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Securities & Exchange Board of India & Anr.

09 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that transferring stock exchange membership to a subsidiary company to comply with SEBI regulations constitutes compulsion of law, entitling the appellant to fee continuity benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fee continuity compulsion of law Securities Contract (Regulation) Rules, 1957 SEBI circular 30.9.2002