Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

State of Uttarakhand & Ors. v. Suman Pal

04 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that reinstatement with backwages is not just for a daily wager relieved years ago and awarded a lump-sum compensation instead.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant daily wager reinstatement backwages monetary compensation

Sameera Paikara v. Amit Ajit Jogi & Ors.

04 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and added the issue of whether an American citizen by birth is eligible to contest State Assembly elections in India for adjudication.

constitutional appeal_allowed Procedural Assembly election eligibility citizenship American citizen by birth State Assembly

Mohdinsa Nabisa Gurikar v. Imamsa Chandas Gurikar

04 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court order and remanded the land dispute case for fresh consideration due to absence of clear findings on key factual questions.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural land dispute partition re-grant of land finding of fact

RAMAKANT DWIVEDI v. RAFIQ AHMAD & ORS.

04 Jan 2016 · ANIL R. DAVE; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Government Order mandating e-tendering for mining leases, rejecting claims of vested rights from pending applications and dismissing leases granted in violation of this policy.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant mining lease minor minerals Uttar Pradesh Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 Government Order 31 May 2012

The Management of Narendra & Company Private Limited v. The Workmen of Narendra & Company

04 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that back wages to workmen cannot be extended beyond the date the industry ceased functioning, affirming that appellate courts should not disturb factual findings without perversity.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant back wages retrenchment compensation industry closure appellate interference

Pramod v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

29 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a senior-most lecturer in a private aided polytechnic is entitled to promotion as Principal under statutory MEPS Rules, overruling the applicability of Government Rules 2012 and directing reinstatement with consequential benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant promotion principal appointment private polytechnic MEPS Rules

S.K.L. Co. v. Chief Commercial Officer

29 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of leasing railway parcel space through competitive tenders while affirming the Railways' duty to fix and enforce upper tariff limits to prevent undue preference and protect public interest.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Railways Act 1989 leasing parcel space Section 70 undue preference tariff fixation

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P. Ltd. v. M/s. Haryana Concast Limited

29 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that secured creditors can enforce security interests under the SARFAESI Act without Company Court intervention during winding up, disallowing supervisory fetters imposed under the Companies Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Companies Act Section 13 SARFAESI Section 529A Companies Act

LIC OF INDIA v. INSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT. LTD.

29 Dec 2015 · Virkamajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that life insurance policies were freely assignable under Section 38 of the Insurance Act, 1938 prior to its 2015 amendment, and insurer's refusal to register assignments was illegal and void.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant life insurance policy assignment transfer Section 38 Insurance Act 1938

The Kerala Bar Hotels Association v. State of Kerala

29 Dec 2015 · Vikramajit Sen; Shivakirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld Kerala's policy restricting liquor licenses to Five Star hotels as a reasonable classification under Articles 14 and 19, affirming the State's power to regulate liquor trade to reduce public consumption.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Abkari Act FL-3 license Article 14 Article 19(1)(g)

Central Bank of India v. Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. & Ors.

29 Dec 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Shivakirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that personal guarantees executed on a specific date do not cover liabilities incurred prior to that date unless expressly stated, dismissing the bank's appeal to hold directors liable for earlier debts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant continuing guarantee surety liability prior debts contra proferentem rule

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

16 Dec 2015 · T.S. Thakur; A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi · (2003) 10 SCC 561

The Supreme Court directed stricter vehicular pollution control measures in Delhi, including diversion of non-Delhi bound vehicles, increased ECC, vehicle entry restrictions, diesel vehicle registration bans, mandatory CNG conversion for taxis, and enforcement of pollution norms to combat severe air pollution.

environmental_law appeal_allowed Significant Environment Compensation Charge vehicular pollution Delhi pollution control vehicle diversion

Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry

16 Dec 2015 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that RBI and banks can withhold certain inspection and penalty-related information under RTI exemptions protecting economic interests, fiduciary relationships, and commercial confidence, balancing transparency with confidentiality.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(a) Section 8(1)(d) Section 8(1)(e)

Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi & Ors.

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree recognizing the suit property as joint family property purchased from insurance proceeds, dismissing the appellant's challenge on procedural and substantive grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant joint family property insurance nomination Hindu widow Karta vs Manager

Mangu Singh v. Dharmendra & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a double murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the unreliability of FIRs, eyewitnesses, and confessional statements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant motive FIR ante-timed FIR eyewitness testimony

Prem Nath Bali v. Delhi & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld compulsory retirement after a fair departmental inquiry but directed that the appellant's prolonged suspension period be counted for pension benefits due to undue delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry compulsory retirement principles of natural justice suspension period

Sri Jagannath Temple Managing Committee v. Siddha Math & Ors.

16 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955, being a special statute, prevails over the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951, and the disputed lands vest in the Temple Managing Committee, overruling prior conflicting decisions rendered per incuriam.

property appeal_allowed Significant Shri Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 amrutamanohi properties special statute vs general statute

Gautam Kundu v. Manoj Kumar, Assistant Director

16 Dec 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's refusal of bail to the appellant in a money laundering case under PMLA, affirming the overriding effect of PMLA's bail provisions and the serious nature of economic offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 24 SEBI Act Section 12A SEBI Act bail under PMLA

Rajiv Singh v. State of Bihar & Another

16 Dec 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of dowry death and related charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove the death of the victim and unreliability of forensic evidence.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant dowry harassment Section 304B IPC DNA evidence dead body identification

Nala Sangam & Ors. v. Government of Tamil Nadu & Anr.

16 Dec 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that appointments of Archakas in Hindu temples must conform to essential religious practices prescribed by the Agamas, protecting religious freedoms under Articles 25 and 26 against executive orders disregarding such customs.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Articles 25 and 26 freedom of religion Hindu religious practices appointment of Archakas