Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Mrigank Johri v. Union of India

10 Jul 2017 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2017 INSC 596

The Supreme Court upheld that employees absorbed on agreed terms as new recruits cannot claim prior service seniority unless recruitment rules permit deputation, dismissing the appeal challenging seniority fixation.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant absorption deputation seniority fixation Articles 14 and 16

Mrigank Johri & Ors v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Jul 2017 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that employees absorbed on agreed terms excluding prior service for seniority cannot later claim such benefit, dismissing their appeal against the seniority fixation in the Department of Post.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant absorption deputation seniority Articles 14 and 16

M/S GENNEX LABORATORIES LTD v. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD & ANR

10 Jul 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to file a statutory appeal before the Sales Tax Tribunal despite prior non-availment, set aside the High Court order dismissing the writ petition, and restored and consolidated related appeals for hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant statutory remedy Sales Tax Tribunal writ petition condonation of delay

NAGAR NIGAM, KANPUR NAGAR v. BRIJBALA TEWARI

10 Jul 2017 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

Termination without mandatory consultation with the Public Service Commission is invalid, but only notional service for pension benefits is granted post-superannuation without back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant termination of service mandatory consultation Public Service Commission service rules

Vithal Rao & Anr. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer

07 Jul 2017 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2017 INSC 595

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by applying established principles to determine market value based on average sale deeds with appropriate deductions for development charges.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 market value compensation development charges deduction

Vithal Rao & Anr. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer

07 Jul 2017 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by applying established principles to determine market value of large undeveloped land, allowing a 40% deduction for development charges based on average sale deed prices.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value compensation development charges deduction

Vikram Singh @ Vicky Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

07 Jul 2017 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions challenging the confirmation of death sentences, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record or sufficient grounds for review existed, and reaffirmed the scope of review jurisdiction in criminal cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant review jurisdiction Article 137 Constitution Order 40 Rule 1 Supreme Court Rules Section 65B Evidence Act

Vikram Singh @ Vicky Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

07 Jul 2017 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions challenging the confirmation of death sentences, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record or sufficient ground for review existed, and reaffirmed the scope of its review jurisdiction in criminal cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant review jurisdiction Article 137 Constitution Order 40 Rule 1 Supreme Court Rules error apparent on face of record

Chairman and Managing Director FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira

06 Jul 2017 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; N V Ramana; Dr D Y Chandrachud · 2017 INSC 591

The Supreme Court held that benefits obtained by fraudulent caste claims are void and must be withdrawn, rejecting equitable protection except in exceptional cases under Article 142.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Other Backward Classes

Chairman and Managing Director FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira

06 Jul 2017 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; N V Ramana; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that benefits obtained through fraudulent caste certificates are void and must be withdrawn, affirming strict adherence to constitutional and statutory provisions governing reservation.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Other Backward Classes

Alka Chandewar v. Shamshul Ishrar Khan

06 Jul 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2017 INSC 593

The Supreme Court held that interim orders passed by the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 are enforceable and the Tribunal can seek contempt proceedings under Section 27(5), overruling the Bombay High Court's restrictive interpretation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim orders Section 27(5) contempt Enforcement of arbitral interim orders

Alka Chandewar v. Shamshul Ishrar Khan

06 Jul 2017 · R. F. Nariman; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that interim orders passed by the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 are enforceable and subject to contempt proceedings under Section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, overruling the Bombay High Court's restrictive interpretation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim orders Section 27(5) contempt Enforcement of arbitral orders

Roger Shashoua v. Mukesh Sharma

04 Jul 2017 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Part I of the Arbitration Act over arbitrations seated outside India, affirming that the seat of arbitration determines supervisory jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Part I applicability Seat of arbitration Venue of arbitration

Roger Shashoua v. Mukesh Sharma

04 Jul 2017 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that Indian courts lack jurisdiction under Part I of the Arbitration Act to entertain challenges to arbitral awards where the seat of arbitration is outside India, affirming that the seat determines supervisory jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 seat of arbitration venue of arbitration

Sant Lal v. Rajesh & Ors.

03 Jul 2017 · Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy · 2017 INSC 581

The Supreme Court held that a driver licensed for light motor vehicles can drive a tractor-trolley transport vehicle without a separate endorsement, and the insurer cannot recover compensation from the owner alone.

civil appeal_allowed Significant light motor vehicle licence transport vehicle endorsement insurance policy conditions

Sant Lal v. Rajesh & Ors.

03 Jul 2017 · Arun Mishra; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that a driver licensed for light motor vehicles can drive a tractor attached to a trolley without a separate endorsement, and the insurer cannot recover compensation from the owner alone.

civil appeal_allowed Significant light motor vehicle licence transport vehicle endorsement on driving licence insurance policy conditions

Manipal University & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Jul 2017 · S. A. Bobde; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court held that the Medical Council of India lacks jurisdiction to regulate NRI admission quotas in deemed universities, quashing its direction restricting such admissions as ultra vires.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Deemed University Medical Council of India NRI quota Admission regulation

Manipal University & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Jul 2017 · S. A. Bobde; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court held that the Medical Council of India lacks jurisdiction to regulate NRI admission quotas in deemed universities, setting aside its direction restricting such admissions as ultra vires.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Deemed University Medical Council of India NRI quota Jurisdiction

D. N. Joshi v. D.C. Harris

03 Jul 2017 · A.M. Khanwilkar; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Muslim gift deed based on constructive possession and affirmed the High Court's eviction decree, holding that substantial compliance with procedural requirements for second appeals suffices.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant second appeal substantial question of law gift deed Muslim law

D. N. Joshi v. D.C. Harris

03 Jul 2017 · R. Banumathi; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Muslim gift deed with constructive possession and affirmed eviction of tenants, holding that substantial questions of law were properly framed and the High Court rightly interfered with concurrent findings of fact.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant second appeal substantial question of law gift deed Muslim law