Supreme Court of India
15,089 judgments
Laurel Energetics Pvt. Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
The Supreme Court held that Regulation 10 exemption under SEBI Takeover Regulations applies strictly to promoters named in the target company for three years, rejecting the appellant's claim based on promoter continuity through corporate restructuring.
Laldhari Mistri v. Vijay Kumar
The Supreme Court set aside an ex-parte decree obtained under suspicious circumstances and directed the suit for specific performance to be heard on merits, emphasizing justice over procedural bars.
Laldhari Mistri v. Vijay Kumar
The Supreme Court set aside an ex-parte decree obtained by a doubtful party and directed the suit to be heard on merits, emphasizing justice over procedural technicalities.
Pravind Kumar v. Radhe Ballabh Mishra
The Supreme Court quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following an amicable settlement and full satisfaction of the cheque amount by the complainant.
Pravind Kumar v. Radhe Ballabh Mishra
The Supreme Court quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following an amicable settlement and full payment to the complainant, emphasizing justice and equity.
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. M.S.RATHI
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside disciplinary findings against a chartered accountant due to lack of evidence of professional misconduct.
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA v. M.S.RATHI
The Supreme Court dismissed the ICAI's appeal and upheld the High Court's order setting aside disciplinary findings against a chartered accountant due to lack of sufficient evidence of professional misconduct.
Ram Murti Devi v. Pushpa Devi
The Supreme Court restored the eviction decree against the tenant for subletting a portion of the shop without consent, holding that the landlord discharged the burden of proof and the tenant failed to rebut the presumption of subletting.
Manager, Corporate Educational Agency v. James Mathew & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that minority educational institutions have an absolute constitutional right under Article 30(1) to appoint their chosen Headmasters without being bound by seniority, and that minority status declarations by the National Commission apply retrospectively.
Manager, Corporate Educational Agency v. James Mathew & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that minority educational institutions have an absolute right under Article 30(1) to appoint their chosen Headmaster from the minority community, and minority status certificates issued by the National Commission have retrospective effect.
Kale v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that compensation is payable only for the land actually acquired as per official records, rejecting the appellants' claim for additional land compensation.
Kamaljit Kaur v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
The Supreme Court invoked its Article 142 jurisdiction to direct compensation and declare service status in an Anganwadi worker appointment dispute, disposing of the appeals with an equitable settlement.
Kamaljit Kaur v. The State of Punjab
The Supreme Court invoked its Article 142 jurisdiction to settle a familial service dispute by directing compensation and recognizing continuous service of the daughter-in-law as an Anganwadi worker.
Madho Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding appointment against a reserved post and directed the appellant to make a representation to the State for consideration of his claim with opportunity of hearing to all affected parties.
B.A. Naik v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, UKP
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to enhance land acquisition compensation to Rs. 6.5 Lakhs per acre with statutory benefits, excluding benefits for delay caused by appellate proceedings.
B.A. Naik v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, UKP
The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal to enhance land acquisition compensation to Rs. 6.5 Lakhs per acre as fixed in a connected matter, but denied statutory benefits for delay caused by litigation.
P.N. Mohanan Nair v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court held that when offences arising from a single transaction are split into multiple prosecutions, sentences should be directed to run concurrently under Section 427(1) Cr.P.C., exercising judicial discretion on just principles.
P.N. Mohanan Nair v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court held that when offences arise from a single transaction split into multiple prosecutions, sentences should run concurrently under Section 427(1) CrPC, exercising judicial discretion on just principles.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. & Anr v. M/s Atwal Rice & General Mills
The Supreme Court held that a final arbitral award is enforceable as a decree, disallowed merit-based objections in execution, and set aside the dismissal of the execution petition for non-payment.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. v. M/s Atwal Rice & General Mills
The Supreme Court held that a final arbitral award has the status of a civil court decree and cannot be challenged on merits in execution proceedings, setting aside the dismissal of execution petition and directing enforcement of the award.