Supreme Court of India

18,798 judgments

Year:

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S. NIM INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE(P)LTD

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. DSQ SOFTWARE LTD. & ANR

31 Aug 2016 · ANIL R. DAVE; L. NAGESWARA RAO

The Supreme Court allowed SEBI's appeal, set aside the SAT orders due to non-deposit of Rs. 30 Crores by the respondent, and revived the original SEBI order dated 9th September, 2004.

administrative appeal_allowed Securities & Exchange Board of India deposit order revival of order Securities Appellate Tribunal

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AMARJIT SINGH

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal and allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 11 Section 24(2)

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAGDISH P. KHANNA

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, granting it one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11 land acquisition

Delhi Development Authority v. Mohd. Naseem

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original landowners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

Delhi Development Authority v. Kusham Jain

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that failure to pay compensation to landowners before 1.1.2014 under the 2013 Act causes acquisition proceedings to lapse, dismissing DDA's appeal and allowing fresh acquisition only under the new Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) compensation payment

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal against land acquisition proceedings, allowing one year to initiate fresh acquisition under the 2013 Act or return possession to original owners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 11 notification Section 24(2) fresh acquisition

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. KESHAV SURI

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SUKHBIR SINGH

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

Babita Lila & Another v. Union of India

31 Aug 2016 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 195 CrPC alleging offences in income tax search proceedings must be filed by the competent appellate authority, and the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)-I, Bhopal, lacked such competence, rendering the prosecution invalid.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Income Tax Act appellate jurisdiction Competence to file complaint Judicial proceedings under Income Tax Act

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SIDDHARTH GUPTA

31 Aug 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; C. NAGAPPAN

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the LARR Act or return possession to the original landowners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) land acquisition fresh acquisition proceedings

KEDAR NATH YADAV v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

31 Aug 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld the acquisition of land by West Bengal for Tata Motors as a valid public purpose under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing the broad and evolving nature of public purpose in eminent domain.

property appeal_dismissed Significant eminent domain public purpose land acquisition Land Acquisition Act 1894

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHYAM LAL

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 land acquisition Section 11 notification Section 24(2) re-initiation

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHAMIM QURESHI

31 Aug 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; C. NAGAPPAN

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must revert to original landowners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ISHWAR SINGH

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RAM PRAKASH KATHURIA

31 Aug 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; C. NAGAPPAN

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. KRISHAN KANT GOYAL

31 Aug 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; C. NAGAPPAN

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but granted one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 11 Notification Section 24(2) liberty

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. UDAY SINGH

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. CHAND

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the 2013 Act or return possession to the original owners.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 11 Section 24(2)

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RATTAN SINGH

31 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year or return possession to original owners under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 24(2) Section 11