Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Satpal Singh v. State of Punjab

27 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail in NDPS cases involving commercial quantity must comply with Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions and set aside improperly granted bail orders, emphasizing the distinct nature of anticipatory and regular bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity Section 438 CrPC

GAGAN CH. KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

27 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed the appellant's appointment as regular PGT Economics teacher due to vacancy caused by non-joining of selected candidates and his long continuous service on honorarium basis.

civil appeal_allowed appointment PGT Economics honorarium teacher vacancy

GAGAN CH. KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

27 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed the appellant's regular appointment as PGT Economics, recognizing his long-term honorarium service and vacancy due to non-joining of meritorious candidates.

civil appeal_allowed PGT Economics appointment honorarium service merit-based appointment non-joining candidates

Ganapathi & Anr. v. The State of Tamil Nadu

27 Mar 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld convictions based on credible testimony of family member witnesses and rejected defense claims of interestedness and alibi, affirming that related witnesses' evidence can sustain murder convictions when corroborated.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant interested witness ocular evidence family members as witnesses Section 302 IPC

Ganapathi & Anr. v. The State of Tamil Nadu

27 Mar 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld convictions based on credible testimonies of family members and a child eyewitness, clarifying that relationship alone does not discredit witness evidence in murder trials.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant interested witness ocular evidence family members as witnesses murder

COMPAQ INTERNATIONAL & ANR. v. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

27 Mar 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that the driving licence was valid on the accident date, reinstating insurance liability and setting aside orders absolving the insurer and denying compensation.

motor_vehicles/insurance/consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant driving licence validity Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 14 insurance liability licence renewal

COMPAQ INTERNATIONAL & ANR. v. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

27 Mar 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that the driver's licence was valid on the date of the accident, thereby upholding insurance liability and setting aside orders absolving the insurer based on an erroneous finding of licence expiry.

motor_vehicles/insurance/consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant driving licence validity Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 14 insurance liability

Manju Surana v. Sunilarora & Ors.

27 Mar 2018 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question whether prior sanction is required before investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. against public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act and struck off a wrongly arrayed accused from the complaint.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant prior sanction Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. cognizance Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Kedar Nath Kohli by LRs. v. Baldev Singh

27 Mar 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and decreed possession in favor of the appellant after holding that the respondent's sale deed was forged and did not pertain to the suit property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession suit sale deed forgery property dispute plot ownership

Kedar Nath Kohli v. Baldev Singh

27 Mar 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the respondent's sale deed was forged and the appellant is the rightful owner entitled to possession of Plot No. 27 in Kotla Mubarakpur.

civil appeal_allowed Significant sale deed possession ownership forgery

Shakti Vahini v. Union of India

27 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 266
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that honour killings violate fundamental rights and directed States and the Union to take effective measures, including legislation, to protect individuals' constitutional right to choose their life partners free from extra-constitutional interference.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant honour killing fundamental rights Article 21 Article 19

Shakti Vahini v. Union of India

27 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that honour killings violate fundamental rights and directed States and the Union to take effective measures to prevent such crimes and protect individuals' freedom to marry by choice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant honour killing fundamental rights Article 21 right to marry

Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel v. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel

27 Mar 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period to challenge an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act begins from the date the signed award is received by the authorized party, dismissing the challenge filed after delay as time barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation Section 31(5) delivery of award Arbitral award challenge

Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel v. Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel

27 Mar 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act begins from the date the award is received by the party or their authorized representative, dismissing the challenge filed after the limitation period.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation Section 31(5) delivery of award Arbitral award challenge

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK v. SATINDER KAPUR

27 Mar 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR; NAVIN SINHA

The Supreme Court disposed of civil appeals filed by Punjab National Bank by recording the parties' settlement and directing compliance with its terms.

civil settled Procedural Deed of Settlement Civil Appeal High Court of Delhi Disposal of Appeal

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK v. SATINDER KAPUR

27 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court disposed of civil appeals by recording the parties' settlement and directed strict compliance with the settlement terms.

civil settled Deed of Settlement Civil Appeal Supreme Court Settlement Agreement

MACKINTOSH BURN LIMITED v. SARKAR AND CHOWDHURY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED

27 Mar 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court remitted the dispute over refusal to register share transfer to the National Company Law Tribunal for fresh consideration, emphasizing that refusal must be based on sufficient cause and all legal questions must be duly considered.

corporate remanded Significant refusal of registration transfer of shares Companies Act 2013 Companies Act 1956

MACKINTOSH BURN LIMITED v. SARKAR AND CHOWDHURY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED

27 Mar 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court remitted the dispute over refusal to register share transfer to the National Company Law Tribunal for fresh consideration, clarifying that refusal must be for sufficient cause and all legal questions including limitation must be considered.

corporate remanded Significant Companies Act 2013 Section 58 share transfer refusal of registration

ANUPAMA PATIL v. NATARAJ VEERANAGOUDA PATIL

26 Mar 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR; NAVIN SINHA

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial case from Hubballi to Bengaluru, setting aside the High Court's refusal, and directed expeditious disposal of the case.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition matrimonial case Family Court mediation

Bitan Sengupta v. State of West Bengal

26 Mar 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 264

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside convictions under Section 498A IPC after parties settled matrimonial disputes through compromise and mutual divorce.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC dowry harassment compounding offences matrimonial dispute