Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS v. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.

22 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that jurisdictional objections can be raised under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act even if not raised under Section 16, and that public policy of India includes both State and Central laws for setting aside arbitral awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction objection Section 34 challenge Public policy of India

M/S LION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS v. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.

22 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that jurisdictional objections can be raised under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act even if not raised under Section 16, clarified that public policy of India includes State laws, and set aside an order allowing amendment beyond limitation as not pressed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction Section 34 challenge public policy of India

Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy

21 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 249

The Supreme Court held that an election petition disclosing material facts constituting a cause of action cannot be dismissed in limine and set aside the High Court's order striking out pleadings and dismissing the petition.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant election petition cause of action material facts Representation of the People Act, 1951

Madiraju Venkata Ramana Raju v. Peddireddigari Ramachandra Reddy

21 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that an election petition disclosing material facts of improper acceptance of nomination cannot be dismissed in limine and remanded the matter for trial.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant election petition cause of action improper acceptance of nomination Representation of the People Act, 1951

Rakesh Birani v. Prem Narain Sehgal

21 Mar 2018 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the 15-day period for payment of the balance auction amount under SARFAESI Rules starts from the date of confirmation of sale by the secured creditor, not the auction date, and allowed the auction purchaser's appeal setting aside the cancellation of sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction sale confirmation of sale Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9

Rakesh Birani v. Prem Narain Sehgal

21 Mar 2018 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the 15-day period for payment of the balance auction amount under Rule 9 of the 2002 Rules starts from the date of confirmation of sale by the secured creditor, not the auction date, and allowed the auction purchaser's appeal setting aside the cancellation of sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction sale Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9 confirmation of sale

Krishna Devi v. Keshri Nandan

21 Mar 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a sale deed executed by Dharam Singh, dismissing the appellant's claim of fraud and unsoundness of mind, and thereby rejecting her claim to partition of the property.

civil appeal_dismissed sale deed fraud misrepresentation sound mind

Krishna Devi v. Keshri Nandan

21 Mar 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a sale deed executed by Dharam Singh, dismissing the appellant's claim of fraud and entitlement to partition.

civil appeal_dismissed sale deed fraud misrepresentation sound mind

Mohan Lal v. Nand Lal

21 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a handwritten Will and dismissed the appellant's claim to the disputed property, affirming the respondent's sole ownership and the decree for ejectment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Indian Succession Act Handwritten Will Mutation of Property

Mohan Lal v. Nand Lal

21 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a handwritten Will and dismissed the appellant's claim to share in the disputed property, affirming the concurrent findings of the lower courts.

civil appeal_dismissed Will Indian Succession Act Sections 61 and 63 Evidence Act

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Om Pal & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness credibility benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC murder trial

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Om Pal & Ors.

21 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness credibility benefit of doubt Section 302 IPC murder trial

Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra

20 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2018 INSC 248
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that mere mala fide allegations cannot justify prosecution of public servants under the SC/ST Act and emphasized procedural safeguards to prevent abuse while upholding constitutional rights under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Article 21 Constitution of India mala fide prosecution procedural safeguards

DR. SUBHASH KASHINATH MAHAJAN v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

20 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that procedural safeguards are essential to prevent misuse of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, balancing protection of victims with fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21, and directed preliminary enquiry and judicial scrutiny before arrest under the Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 197 Cr.P.C. Section 18 Atrocities Act Article 21 Constitution of India

Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. General Manager 1, State Bank of India & Ors.

20 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that an employer can withhold voluntary retirement during disciplinary proceedings but must consider such application once proceedings conclude, directing payment of arrears and allowing fresh application.

employment appeal_allowed Significant voluntary retirement disciplinary proceedings penalty arrears of salary

Ramakant V v. Purnima

19 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court enforced a mediated settlement resolving matrimonial and financial disputes, including a reasonable compromise of bank dues, and dismissed all pending litigation between the parties.

family appeal_allowed Significant matrimonial dispute settlement mediation ICICI Bank dues

Ramakant V v. Purnima & Anr.

19 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court approved a mediated settlement resolving long-standing matrimonial and financial disputes, directing a reasonable compromise of bank dues and dismissal of all pending cases.

family appeal_allowed Significant matrimonial dispute settlement mediation home loan dues

P. Sreekumar v. State of Kerala

19 Mar 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent FIR filed by a different complainant as a counter-complaint is maintainable and set aside the High Court's order quashing such FIR and charge-sheet.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR counter-complaint quashing Section 482 CrPC

P. Sreekumar v. State of Kerala

19 Mar 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a second FIR filed as a counter-complaint by a different complainant alleging a different version of the same incident is maintainable and set aside the High Court's order quashing such FIR and charge-sheet.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR counter-complaint quashing Section 482 CrPC

Karshanbhai Ramjibhai Jaladiya v. District Development Officer and Anr.

19 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2018 INSC 242

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for terminated workmen denied reinstatement due to lack of vacancies and granted preferential appointment rights for future vacancies, resolving a decades-long employment dispute.

labor appeal_allowed reinstatement compensation preferential appointment workmen service