Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Krishnakant Tamrakar v. State of Madhya Pradesh

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court emphasized the fundamental right to speedy justice, highlighting systemic judicial delays, and directed comprehensive reforms in judicial appointments, case management, and regulation of legal profession strikes while dismissing the appellant's bail plea.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant speedy justice criminal appeals judicial appointments judicial vacancies

Sanjay Shankar Pandey & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective validity of suitability tests for promotion and mandated pragmatic application of the quota-rota system for seniority fixation between promotee and direct recruit Higher Judicial Service officers in Uttar Pradesh.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Higher Judicial Service Seniority Promotees Direct recruits

ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; R.F. Nariman · 2018 INSC 282
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court clarified that while the High Court's revisional jurisdiction is barred against orders framing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, it retains limited inherent and constitutional jurisdiction to intervene only in exceptional cases, emphasizing expeditious trial and restricting stay of proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19(3)(c) framing of charge interlocutory order

ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; R.F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that challenges to orders framing charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act are maintainable only in rare cases to correct patent illegality, with strict limitations on stay of proceedings to ensure expeditious trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Order framing charge Interlocutory order Section 19(3)(c) PC Act

Mohinder Singh v. Paramjit Singh

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for a possession suit under the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act starts from the date the declaratory decree is formally drawn, and Section 14 of the Limitation Act excludes time spent in bona fide execution proceedings, thus the suit filed was within limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920 declaratory decree limitation period

Mohinder Singh v. Paramjit Singh

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for a suit for possession based on a declaratory decree under the Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act, 1920 begins from the date the decree is obtained, and Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 excludes time spent in bona fide execution proceedings, thus the suit filed was within limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act 1963 Punjab Limitation (Custom) Act 1920 declaratory decree period of limitation

P. Meenakshisundaram v. P. Vijayakumar

28 Mar 2018 · R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to lack of continuous readiness and willingness by the purchaser and allowed the vendor's counterclaim for possession and refund of advances.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness encumbrance sale agreement

P. Meenakshisundaram v. P. Vijayakumar

28 Mar 2018 · R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to lack of continuous readiness and willingness by the purchaser and ordered refund of advances and delivery of possession to the vendor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness encumbrance possession

Harita Sunil Parab v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that transfer of criminal cases requires a reasonable apprehension of injustice and mere inconvenience or speculative fears do not justify transfer, thus rejecting the petitioner’s transfer petitions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant transfer of criminal cases reasonable apprehension fair trial convenience of parties

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ravinder Kumar Sankhayan

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court set aside High Court interim orders directing public tender and eviction of HPTDC, holding that a valid subsisting lease cannot be interfered with without authoritative adjudication and statutory procedure must be followed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant subsisting lease agreement municipal corporation Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation interim order

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ravinder Kumar Sankhayan

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court set aside High Court interim orders directing re-leasing of municipal property under a subsisting lease with HPTDC, emphasizing respect for contractual rights and statutory procedures.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant subsisting lease agreement municipal corporation Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 Section 157

State of Tamil Nadu v. S. Martin

28 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal, setting aside the High Court's premature quashing of the FIR and restoring the investigation into alleged illegal lottery operations and unaccounted cash possession.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR unaccounted cash illegal lottery tickets

Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis v. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice

28 Mar 2018 · S.A. Bobde; L. Nageswara Rao

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking to reopen the settled assassination case of Mahatma Gandhi and review the Kapur Commission report, affirming the finality of criminal convictions and the non-justiciability of commission findings.

criminal petition_dismissed Mahatma Gandhi assassination Nathuram Godse finality of criminal convictions Kapur Commission

Dr. Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis v. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice

28 Mar 2018 · S.A. Bobde; L. Nageswara Rao · 1959 SCR 279; AIR 1958 SC 538

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking to reopen the settled conviction in Mahatma Gandhi's assassination and review the Kapur Commission Report, affirming the finality of criminal judgments and the recommendatory nature of commission findings.

criminal petition_dismissed Mahatma Gandhi assassination Nathuram Godse Kapur Commission Commission of Inquiry

Municipal Corporation, Ujjain & Anr v. BVG India Limited and Ors

28 Mar 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that judicial review of contract awards is limited to examining the decision-making process for arbitrariness or mala fide and reinstated the contract awarded to the technically superior bidder, emphasizing judicial restraint in tender evaluations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review tender evaluation municipal solid waste management technical bid

Municipal Corporation, Ujjain & Anr. v. BVG India Limited and Ors.

28 Mar 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the award of municipal solid waste management contract to the technically qualified bidder, emphasizing limited judicial review over technical evaluations and rejecting the High Court's re-assessment of bids.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review tender evaluation technical bid financial bid

Vinod v. Collector and Chairman, District Selection Committee, Chandrapur

28 Mar 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a second writ petition challenging a subsequent order is maintainable despite withdrawal of an earlier petition and remanded the matter for merits consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ petition maintainability withdrawal of petition principles of natural justice

Shivawwa and Anr. v. The Branch Manager, National India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar · 2018 INSC 285

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award holding the insurer liable for compensation as the deceased was traveling with his goods and the accident was caused by the driver's negligence.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Insurance liability Compensation

Shivawwa and Anr. v. The Branch Manager, National India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

28 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court restored the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the insurer liable for compensation as the deceased was traveling on the insured vehicle and died due to the driver's negligence.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 insurance liability compensation

Lakshmamma v. Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority

28 Mar 2018 · Aurn Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that existing members of a Scheduled Caste cooperative society retain property rights irrespective of caste, and ordered restoration of the 'khata' wrongly cancelled by the Authority.

property appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste membership Cooperative society Khata restoration Property rights