Supreme Court of India
14,826 judgments
STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ORS v. KANWAL NAIN SINGH
The Supreme Court held that an irrevocable voluntary retirement application cannot be withdrawn and set aside the High Court's judgment reopening the respondent's case after prior binding Supreme Court decisions.
STATE BANK OF PATIALA v. KANWAL NAIN SINGH
The Supreme Court held that a voluntary retirement application under an irrevocable scheme cannot be withdrawn and set aside the High Court's order reopening the respondent's case after final Supreme Court judgments.
Ashish Kumar Yadav & Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Police Constable candidates alleged to have used impermissible means, directing the High Court to expeditiously decide their pending writ petitions without extending the benefit granted to Sub-Inspector candidates at this stage.
Director, Prasar Bharati v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Supreme Court held that payments made by Prasar Bharati to advertising agencies constituted commission under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, mandating tax deduction at source, and dismissed the appellant's appeals.
ONGC PURBANCHAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court Division Bench's remand order and directed it to decide the writ appeals on merits regarding regularization of ONGC contract labourers.
ONGC PURBANCHAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court Division Bench's remand of industrial disputes concerning contract labour regularization and directed the appeals to be decided on merits expeditiously.
Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court mandated phased implementation of videography in police investigations as a best practice, clarifying admissibility of electronic evidence and directing institutional reforms for effective use of technology in criminal justice.
CHANDRABOSH TRIPATHI v. MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY BOARD
The Supreme Court directed the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board to reconsider and decide the appellant's compassionate appointment application within three weeks, emphasizing timely and reasoned orders.
Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court remitted connected appeals concerning enhancement of compensation for acquired land to the High Court for consolidated adjudication, without deciding on the merits.
Shanti Devi v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court remitted appeals seeking enhancement of land acquisition compensation to the High Court for joint consideration with connected matters, disposing of the appeals without costs.
LAKSHMI NARAIN DUBEY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court held that a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing must be given before refusing approval of appointment or terminating service, and directed the Competent Authority to follow due process before passing final orders.
LAKSHMI NARAIN DUBEY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court held that a competent authority must issue a show cause notice and provide an opportunity of hearing before passing any adverse order affecting service, and directed fresh consideration accordingly.
M. Kuppaswamy v. R. Vandana
The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording and enforcing a settlement reached through mediation between the parties.
M. Kuppaswamy v. R. Vandana
The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording and enforcing a settlement reached through mediation between the parties.
Lakshmi @ Lakshmamma v. Chamundamma
The Supreme Court disposed of a family dispute between two wives of a deceased by recording their compromise on compassionate appointment and distribution of benefits, directing implementation accordingly.
Lakshmi @ Lakshmamma v. Chamundamma
The Supreme Court disposed of a family dispute appeal by recording a settlement allocating compassionate appointment to one wife and other benefits to the other, directing implementation without costs.
K. Anbazhagan & Ors. v. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that Fast Track Court Judges appointed on ad hoc basis are entitled to pension, gratuity, and leave encashment benefits under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, rejecting the claim that their appointments were contractual and non-pensionable.
K. Anbazhagan & Anr. v. The Registrar General, High Court of Madras & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that Fast Track Court Judges appointed on ad hoc basis against sanctioned posts are entitled to pension, gratuity, and leave encashment under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, rejecting the claim that they were mere contract appointees.
SAU. SHARDA SURESH INGOLE v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI
The Supreme Court set aside the disqualification of a Gram Panchayat member and allowed her to contest fresh elections subject to scrutiny by authorities.
SAU. SHARDA SURESH INGOLE v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against disqualification of a Gram Panchayat member, directing authorities to consider eligibility submissions during fresh election nominations.