Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India

18 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M. R. Shah · 2020 INSC 494
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the existing National Disaster Management Plan and relief guidelines under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 adequately cover COVID-19, and rejected the petitioner's demand for a separate plan and fund consolidation.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Disaster Management Act, 2005 National Disaster Management Plan COVID-19 pandemic National Disaster Response Fund

Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India

18 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that the existing National Disaster Management Plan and guidelines under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 adequately cover COVID-19, and the Union is not required to prepare a separate plan or transfer PM CARES Fund monies to the National Disaster Response Fund.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Disaster Management Act, 2005 National Disaster Management Plan COVID-19 pandemic National Disaster Response Fund

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India

14 Aug 2020 · Arun Mishra; B.R. Gavai; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that the Monitoring Committee lacks authority to seal residential premises on private land not used for commercial purposes, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Monitoring Committee Sealing of premises Residential premises Commercial misuse

Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd.

14 Aug 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code filed beyond three years from the date of default without valid acknowledgment is barred by limitation, overruling NCLAT's contrary view.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC limitation period Limitation Act, 1963

Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd.

14 Aug 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is not barred by limitation if the corporate debtor has continuously acknowledged the debt or the claim is secured by mortgage, thereby extending the limitation period beyond the date of default.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC limitation period Limitation Act, 1963

Union of India v. M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co.

14 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a lease-based compensation decree under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that fraud must be pleaded and proved with particulars to set aside a final decree.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sections 30 and 31 fraud in decree lease vs license

Union of India v. M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co.

14 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a suit alleging fraud in a prior compensation decree under the Land Acquisition Act, holding that fraud must be pleaded and proved with particulars and that possession under an unregistered lease is protected under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Sections 30 and 31 fraud in decree lease vs license

Prashant Bhushan v. Supreme Court of India

14 Aug 2020 · Arun Mishra; B. R. Gavai; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court affirmed its inherent constitutional power to initiate suo motu contempt proceedings without Attorney General's consent and held that tweets scandalizing the Court's authority constitute criminal contempt, while intermediaries enjoy safe harbour protection.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court suo motu proceedings Article 129 Constitution Article 142 Constitution

Preet Pal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

14 Aug 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order granted post-conviction for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, emphasizing the need for recorded reasons and strong grounds for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304B IPC dowry death post-conviction bail Section 389 CrPC

M. Radha Hari Seshu v. The State of Telangana

14 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy · 2020 INSC 491

The Supreme Court allowed bail and suspended sentence of a convicted appellant under Sections 304B and 498A IPC pending appeal, emphasizing discretion in granting relief during prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence bail pending appeal Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC

M. Radha Hari Seshu v. The State of Telangana

14 Aug 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal by suspending his sentence and granting bail pending appeal against conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC, emphasizing consideration of custody duration and pendency of appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC suspension of sentence bail pending appeal

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma

11 Aug 2020 · Arun Mishra; S. Abdul Nazeer; M. R. Shah
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that daughters acquire coparcenary rights prospectively from the 2005 Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, protecting prior partitions and abrogating the rule of survivorship.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6 coparcenary rights daughter's inheritance

Wonder Projects Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

11 Aug 2020 · S.A. BOBDE; A.S. BOPANNA; V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

The Supreme Court set aside the NGT order invalidating environmental clearance due to absence of the final Joint Committee report and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance National Green Tribunal buffer zone Joint Committee report

Common Cause v. Union of India

11 Aug 2020 · S.A. Bobde; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian · WP (C) No.114/2014

The Supreme Court condoned delay in payment of compensation with interest by OMDC, allowed resumption of mining operations, and directed joint verification and sale of undisposed stock by the State of Orissa.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay compensation payment mining lease Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

Common Cause v. Union of India

11 Aug 2020 · S.A. Bobde; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court condoned delay in compensation payment by OMDC, allowed resumption of mining operations, and directed joint verification and sale of undisposed stock by the State of Orissa.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay compensation payment mining lease M.M.D.R. Act 1957

Government of India v. ISRO Drivers Association

10 Aug 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that associations formed exclusively on job description do not constitute a 'distinct category' under the Central Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules, 1993, and thus are not entitled to recognition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant distinct category service association recognition Central Civil Services Rules 1993 Joint Consultative Machinery

Government of India & Ors. v. ISRO Drivers Association

10 Aug 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that an association formed exclusively by drivers does not constitute a 'distinct category' under the Central Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules, 1993, and is not entitled to recognition, upholding administrative clarifications restricting recognition to broader employee categories.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant distinct category service association recognition Central Civil Services Rules 1993 Joint Consultative Machinery

HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

07 Aug 2020 · Indu Malhotra; Indira Banerjee
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that an erroneous recording of a private road as public property in a Town Planning Scheme can be corrected under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, and land does not vest in the Planning Authority without acquisition and compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 88 Section 91 Town Planning Scheme

Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr v. National Insurance Company

07 Aug 2020 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer; Surya Kant · 2020 INSC 483
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a 45-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act can be condoned if sufficiently explained, emphasizing liberal interpretation of beneficial legislation to protect victims' rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173 delay condonation sufficient cause

Brahampal @ Sammay and Anr v. National Insurance Company

07 Aug 2020 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer; Surya Kant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that delay in filing an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act should be condoned liberally if sufficient cause is shown, and set aside the High Court's dismissal of a 45-day delayed appeal in a motor accident compensation case.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173 delay condonation sufficient cause