Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Rama Nand and Ors. v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Aug 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that deployment of Telephone Operators as Radio Telephone Operators involving minimum service and specialised training amounts to promotion, denying ACP Scheme benefits.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme promotion vs upgradation financial upgradation service law

Rama Nand and Ors. v. Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

06 Aug 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Advancement to a higher pay scale with eligibility criteria involving selection constitutes promotion, excluding entitlement to ACP benefits.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme promotion vs upgradation financial upgradation reorganisation

MEDIPOL PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT. LTD. v. POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH AND ANR.

05 Aug 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Navin Sinha · 2020 INSC 479

The Supreme Court set aside the blacklisting of a pharmaceutical company due to reliance on a flawed initial drug test report delayed beyond product shelf life, emphasizing the right to timely appellate testing and fair procedure.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 25 Government Analyst report Central Drugs Laboratory

MEDIPOL PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT. LTD. v. POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH AND ANR.

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court set aside a blacklisting order based on flawed drug test reports and upheld the statutory right to appellate testing and fair procedure in government procurement disputes.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 25 blacklisting appellate laboratory report

M/S. EXL CAREERS AND ANOTHER v. FRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a suit must proceed de novo after return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10 and 10A CPC, but declined to disturb continuation of suit from earlier stage due to parties' conduct and facts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order VII Rule 10A CPC exclusive jurisdiction clause return of plaint

M/S. EXL CAREERS AND ANOTHER v. FRANKFINN AVIATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that a suit must proceed de novo after return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10 and 10A CPC, overruling contrary precedents, but declined to set aside continuation of suit on facts in this case.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC Order VII Rule 10A CPC return of plaint exclusive jurisdiction clause

Gangadhar alias Gangaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant under the NDPS Act due to failure of the prosecution to prove conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt and flawed police investigation violating the right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act possession of contraband burden of proof conscious possession

Gangadhar alias Gangaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in an NDPS case due to flawed investigation and failure of the prosecution to prove conscious possession beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act conscious possession burden of proof presumption of ownership

Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India

05 Aug 2020 · S.A. BOBDE; R. SUBHASH REDDY; B.R. GAVAI · 2020 INSC 475

The Supreme Court referred the constitutional validity challenge to the 103rd Amendment Act, providing 10% reservation for economically weaker sections, to a five-judge Constitution Bench for final adjudication, holding that substantial questions of constitutional law are involved.

constitutional other Procedural Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 Economically Weaker Sections Reservation Basic Structure Doctrine

Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India

05 Aug 2020 · S.A. Bobde; R. Subhash Reddy; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court referred the constitutional validity of the 103rd Amendment on economically weaker sections and related reservation issues to a five-judge Constitution Bench, holding that substantial questions of law are involved.

constitutional other Procedural Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 Economically Weaker Sections Reservation Basic Structure Doctrine

Ajoy Debbarma v. State of Tripura

05 Aug 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of illegal teacher appointments in Tripura, denied recognition of past service, allowed age relaxation for fresh recruitment, and dismissed attempts to reopen final judgments by non-parties.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant illegal appointments teacher recruitment age relaxation natural justice

The Chairman, Board of Trustees, Cochin Port Trust v. M/S Arebee Star Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that steamer agents fall within the inclusive definition of 'owner' under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, making them liable for ground rent and port charges even beyond 75 days if goods remain uncleared and containers undestuffed, rejecting the relevance of title passing to consignees for such liability.

civil other Significant Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 ground rent steamer agent liability Port Trust lien

Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur

31 Jul 2020 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide memorandum of family settlement recording an existing arrangement acted upon by parties does not require registration and is binding, restoring the first appellate Court's decree in favor of the plaintiff's ownership of the suit property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family settlement memorandum of family settlement registration of documents Section 17(2)(v) Registration Act

B.B.M ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

30 Jul 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Ban... · 2020 INSC 472
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a belated Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing minimal judicial interference and reducing the post-award interest rate from 18% to 15%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Judicial interference

B.B.M ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

30 Jul 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Ban...

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral Award as not barred by limitation, reduced the post-award interest rate, and set aside the High Court’s remand order, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Judicial interference

Prem Chand v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's conviction for food adulteration due to lack of conclusive evidence and upheld the trial court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 food adulteration Haldi Powder public analyst report

Prem Chand v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the trial court's acquittal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove food adulteration beyond reasonable doubt under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 food adulteration public analyst report benefit of doubt

DR. ASWATHY R.S. KARTHIKA v. DR. ARCHANA M.

29 Jul 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court held that reservation shortfall for the Hindu Nadar community must be compensated from future vacancies and upheld appointments made from the 2015 rank list, restoring the Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation shortfall Hindu Nadar community Kerala Public Service Commission rank list

DR. ASWATHY R.S. KARTHIKA v. DR. ARCHANA M.

29 Jul 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of Hindu Nadar community candidates to reservation benefits by directing the Kerala Public Service Commission to fill shortfall vacancies from the subsequent rank list, restoring the Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation Hindu Nadar community Other Backward Classes Kerala Public Service Commission

Union of India & Ors. v. Lt. Col. S. S. Bedi

29 Jul 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Ex. Lt. Col. Bedi for outraging the modesty of patients, restored his cashiering sentence, and clarified that pension forfeiture requires a separate order under the Army Act or Pension Regulations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC cashiering Army Act 1950 Army Pension Regulations 1961