Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Mihir Gope v. State of Jharkhand

08 Jan 2021 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants Mihir and Prabhat Gope of murder charges due to insufficient evidence of common intention but convicted them for voluntarily causing hurt, modifying their sentences accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder common intention voluntarily causing hurt eyewitness testimony

Bhaven Construction v. Executive Engineer Sardar

06 Jan 2021 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hrishikesh Roy · 2021 INSC 9

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 cannot be invoked to interfere with arbitral proceedings where an effective statutory remedy under the Arbitration Act exists, and set aside the High Court's order allowing such interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction challenge Section 34 setting aside award Judicial intervention in arbitration

COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA

06 Jan 2021 · S.A. Bobde; A.S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court permitted sale of stockpiled ore under supervision to recover compensation dues but barred resumption of mining without statutory clearances, emphasizing strict compliance with environmental and forest laws.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant MMDR Act, 1957 mining lease extension compensation for illegal mining environmental clearance

Bhaven Construction v. Executive Engineer Sardar

06 Jan 2021 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that judicial interference under Articles 226 and 227 is impermissible in arbitration matters governed by the Arbitration Act when effective statutory remedies exist, setting aside the High Court's writ intervention in the arbitral process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction challenge Section 34 setting aside award Writ jurisdiction Articles 226 and 227

State Bank of India v. Ajay Kumar Srivastava

05 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal of a bank employee for financial misconduct due to procedural lapses violating natural justice, emphasizing limited judicial review in disciplinary cases.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice bank employee dismissal judicial review

Deputy General Manager (Appellate Authority) and Others v. Ajai Kumar Srivastava

05 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi · 2021 INSC 7
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a bank employee for proven charges of misappropriation despite procedural irregularity on one charge, clarifying the scope of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice procedural fairness misappropriation

State Bank of India v. Ajay Kumar Srivastava

05 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a bank employee for financial misconduct, emphasizing limited judicial review in disciplinary proceedings and adherence to natural justice.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings bank employee dismissal natural justice judicial review

Deputy General Manager (Appellate Authority) and Others v. Ajai Kumar Srivastava

05 Jan 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a bank employee for misappropriation, holding that procedural irregularity on one charge did not vitiate dismissal based on other proved charges and limited judicial review to procedural fairness.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary enquiry natural justice procedural fairness misappropriation

Kirti & Anr. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

05 Jan 2021 · Surya Kant; N.V. Ramana
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by applying future prospects to notional income of deceased including homemakers, adopting appropriate minimum wages, and reducing personal expense deductions, thereby affirming principles of just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects notional income homemaker compensation

Kirti & Anr. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

05 Jan 2021 · Surya Kant; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation by applying future prospects to notional income, adjusting personal expense deductions, and recognizing the economic value of homemakers' unpaid work.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects notional income homemaker compensation

Hari Om @ Hero v. State of U.P.

05 Jan 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra; Krishna Murari
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the death sentence and convictions of accused in a dacoity-murder case due to unreliable child witness testimony and insufficient fingerprint evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable corroboration and proper investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness testimony Section 396 IPC fingerprint evidence recovery of weapon

Daulat Ram College v. Dr. Asha

05 Jan 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2021 INSC 8

The Supreme Court held that the Governing Body of a college exclusively holds the authority to appoint the Hostel Warden, overruling the Principal's unilateral appointment and invalidating High Court directions involving the Staff Council.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment of warden Governing Body authority Principal powers University Grants Commission letter

Daulat Ram College v. Dr. Asha

05 Jan 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that the Governing Body of a college exclusively holds the authority to appoint the Hostel Warden, with the Principal's role limited to recommending candidates, and set aside High Court directions involving the Staff Council in the appointment process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment of Warden Governing Body authority Principal's powers Staff Council role

Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

05 Jan 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court upheld the procedural validity and environmental clearance of the Central Vista Project, affirming the legislative nature of land use changes and the advisory role of the Central Vista Committee, while emphasizing principles of natural justice and constitutionalism.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Vista Project Change in land use Delhi Development Act, 1957 Environmental Clearance

SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LTD v. RAMJAN ALI & ORS

05 Jan 2021 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a vehicle hypothecated to a financier cannot be transferred or released to a purchaser based on fraudulent cancellation of hypothecation entry, setting aside the High Court's order releasing the vehicle to the purchaser.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant hypothecation Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 registration certificate fraudulent cancellation

M/s. Padia Timber Company (P) Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust

05 Jan 2021 · Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a conditional acceptance with further conditions does not constitute a concluded contract unless accepted by the original offeror, and thus no contract arose between the parties, entitling the appellant to refund of earnest money.

civil appeal_allowed Significant conditional acceptance contract formation Indian Contract Act Section 7 earnest money refund

M/s. Padia Timber Company (P) Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust

05 Jan 2021 · Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that acceptance with a further condition is a counter-offer requiring acceptance by the original offeror, and since no such acceptance occurred, no concluded contract existed, entitling the appellant to refund of earnest money.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contract formation conditional acceptance counter-offer Indian Contract Act Section 7

V.N. Public Health and Educational Trust v. State of Kerala & Ors.

01 Jan 2021 · A. M. Khanwilkar; B. R. Gavai; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that issuance of Essentiality Certificate and Consent of Affiliation involves quasi-judicial scrutiny, can be withdrawn if foundational conditions fail, and dismissed the appellant's plea for 2020-2021 due to non-compliance with infrastructure norms and timelines.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Essentiality Certificate Consent of Affiliation Medical College establishment Medical Council of India

V.N. Public Health and Educational Trust v. State of Kerala & Ors.

23 Nov 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; B. R. Gavai; Krishna Murari · 2021 INSC 117
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that grant of Essentiality Certificate and Consent of Affiliation for medical colleges is a quasi-judicial function requiring strict compliance with infrastructure and procedural norms, and dismissed the appellant's plea for relief for the academic year 2020-2021 due to deficiencies and missed deadlines.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Essentiality Certificate Consent of Affiliation Medical College Establishment Medical Council of India

Geo Varghese v. State of Rajasthan

09 Nov 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR under Section 306 IPC against a teacher, holding that mere reprimand without intent to abet suicide does not constitute abetment and the FIR did not disclose a prima facie offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR