Supreme Court of India

16,357 judgments

Year:

Electrosteel Steels Limited v. Union of India

09 Dec 2021 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal permitting operation of a steel plant pending environmental clearance, holding that ex post facto clearance may be granted in exceptional cases applying principles of proportionality and polluter pays.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Ex post facto clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Electrosteel Steels Limited v. Union of India

09 Dec 2021 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal permitting operation of a steel plant despite site-shifting violations, endorsing conditional ex post facto environmental clearance under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, balancing environmental protection with economic and social considerations.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Ex post facto clearance Forest Conservation Act, 1980

Gulab v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; Vikram Nath · 2021 INSC 852
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony, rejecting challenges on delay, related witnesses, and absence of ballistic expert evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention eyewitness testimony

Gulab v. State of Uttar Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; Vikram Nath · 2021 SCC OnLine SC 642
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction under Sections 302 and 34 IPC based on credible eyewitness testimony of relatives, rejecting challenges on delay in FIR, absence of ballistic evidence, and appellant's role limited to exhortation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention eyewitness testimony

M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited v. M/s United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath · 2021 INSC 856

The Supreme Court held that an insurer's failure to file a written statement within the statutory period bars it from filing later, and a complainant cannot be compelled to amend the complaint, setting aside the NCDRC order permitting such amendment and late filing.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13(1) written statement time limit

M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited v. M/s United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 12

The Supreme Court held that a consumer forum cannot compel a complainant to amend the complaint to allow a respondent to file a belated written statement, affirming the mandatory nature of the statutory time limit for filing written statements under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13(1) written statement time limit

Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for triple murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment after emphasizing the need to consider the criminal's potential for reformation before imposing capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of rare ocular evidence reformation and rehabilitation

Jasbir Singh @ Jassa v. State of Punjab

09 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging unexplained delay in mercy petition disposal are independent proceedings allowing Letters Patent Appeals, and undue delay can justify commutation of death sentence under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence mercy petition delay in disposal commutation

Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for triple murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment after emphasizing the need to consider mitigating factors and the possibility of reformation before awarding capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty ocular evidence mitigating circumstances reformation and rehabilitation

K.S. Ranganatha v. Vittal Shetty

08 Dec 2021 · N.V. Ramana; A.S. Bopanna; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the appellant failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legally recoverable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Cheque dishonour Presumption under Section 139

Director of Indian System of Medicine & Anr. v. Dr. Susmi C.T. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · 2021 INSC 839

The Supreme Court held that the Department had reported all valid vacancies and promotions did not create automatic vacancies, setting aside the Tribunal and High Court orders directing additional vacancy reporting.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant vacancies reporting Kerala Public Service Commission ranked list validity promotions and vacancies

Director of Indian System of Medicine & Anr. v. Dr. Susmi C.T. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that only actual and reported vacancies during the currency of a ranked list confer a right to appointment, setting aside tribunal and High Court orders directing reporting of unsubstantiated vacancies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant vacancies reporting Kerala Public Service Commission Rules ranked list validity promotion and vacancies

Rasmita Biswal & Ors. v. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the Pranay Sethi principles on future prospects and directed the insurer to pay the balance amount, emphasizing the need for reasoned appellate orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation motor accident claim loss of dependency

Sandeep v. State of Haryana

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, upholding the conviction and sentence against the petitioner Sandeep, finding no error apparent on record.

criminal petition_dismissed Review Petition Conviction Sentence Benefit of doubt

Pottayil Radha v. State of Kerala and Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging the reduction of sentence and compensation order, holding no error apparent to justify interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Review Petition Reduction of sentence Compensation Error apparent

Shri Kshetrimayum Biren Singh v. The Hon’ble Speaker

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court set aside disqualification orders against MLAs passed solely on newspaper reports without evidence or fair hearing, remanding the cases for fresh adjudication in accordance with natural justice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Tenth Schedule Disqualification of MLA Voluntarily giving up membership Natural justice

Shri Kshetrimayum Biren Singh v. The Hon’ble Speaker

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that newspaper reports alone cannot prove voluntary giving up of party membership for disqualification under the Tenth Schedule and set aside the Speaker's order for lack of procedural fairness, directing a fresh hearing with opportunity for evidence.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant disqualification Tenth Schedule voluntarily giving up membership natural justice

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Gajadhar Nath

08 Dec 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the employer's disciplinary action dismissing a conductor for misconduct, holding that the Tribunal erred in setting aside the removal order despite credible evidence and a defective domestic inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic inquiry industrial dispute misconduct Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' writ petitions challenging land allotment by BDA due to suppression of prior litigation and upheld the validity of the entire land acquisition including kharab-B land.

property appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 suppression of material facts land acquisition

Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' writ petitions challenging land allotment by BDA due to suppression of prior litigation and upheld the validity of the land acquisition and allotment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 suppression of facts land acquisition