Supreme Court of India
16,357 judgments
Bangalore Development Authority v. N. Nanjappa
The Supreme Court held that an obstructor claiming title in property can be impleaded and have their objections adjudicated in execution proceedings under Order XXI Rule 97 and 101 CPC, even without possession.
Bhasin Infotech And Infrastructure Private Limited v. Neema Agarwal
The Supreme Court held that consumer fora have no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 45 days in filing replies under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, affirming the binding prospective effect of the Constitution Bench judgment in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.
VVF (India) Limited v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that protest payments made prior to assessment orders must be adjusted against the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, allowing the appellant's appeal and restoring it for consideration.
VVF (India) Limited v. The State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that protest payments made prior to a tax assessment order must be considered towards the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra VAT Act for filing an appeal.
M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board & Anr. v. K.P. Dwivedi
The Supreme Court held that a consent order referring disputes to arbitration and the resulting unchallenged award attain finality, barring re-litigation of the same claims before another tribunal under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.
Vandana Singh v. Prashant Kumar
The Supreme Court disposed of a transfer petition following the parties' amicable settlement and execution of a final deed of settlement.
State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Jagshi Gangar
The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's interim bail order in a serious MCOCA case, condemning forum shopping and emphasizing that bail cannot amount to acquittal at the interim stage.
Sunil Todi & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a cheque issued as security can attract criminal liability under Section 138 NI Act if a legally enforceable debt exists at presentation, and that mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC is required before issuing summons when accused reside outside jurisdiction.
Union of India v. Mudrika Singh
The Supreme Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to order additional evidence prior to the 2011 amendment and that the Summary Security Force Court was not required to furnish reasons for its findings, thereby upholding the disciplinary conviction for sexual misconduct.
Union of India and Ors. v. Mudrika Singh
The Supreme Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to order additional evidence before the 2011 amendment and that Summary Security Force Courts are not required to give reasons for findings, thereby upholding the disciplinary conviction for sexual misconduct.
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT-4), Mumbai v. M/s Reliance Telecom Limited
The Supreme Court held that the ITAT cannot recall its final order and re-hear the appeal on merits under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, limiting such powers to rectification of mistakes apparent from the record.
Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society v. Vidyasagar
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 25 CPC and transferred the civil suit filed by the respondent against the Legal Aid Society from Ludhiana to Patiala House Court, New Delhi, to prevent prejudice and inconvenience.
Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society v. Vidyasagar
The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a civil suit from Ludhiana to Patiala House Court, New Delhi under Section 25 CPC to prevent prejudice and inconvenience to the petitioner Legal Aid Society.
Pallabi Rai v. Rahul Rai
The Supreme Court allowed transfer of related family dispute cases pending in different courts to a single Family Court for consolidated and expeditious hearing.
Pallabi Rai v. Rahul Rai
The Supreme Court allowed transfer of two related family law cases pending in different courts to a single Family Court for consolidated and expeditious hearing.
ARCE POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. ALPHINE PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of SARFAESI Act proceedings and sale of mortgaged property, holding that the borrower's conduct amounted to waiver and estoppel barring challenge to procedural compliance.
ARCE POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. ALPHINE PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Supreme Court held that a borrower's conduct inducing the creditor to defer SARFAESI enforcement proceedings amounts to waiver and estoppel, barring challenge to the sale, and upheld the validity of the auction and possession taken by the Bank.
Prachi Jain v. Shreyansh Jain
The Supreme Court permitted the respondent to withdraw the Hindu Marriage Petition, resulting in disposal of the transfer petition as infructuous, with liberty to revive if withdrawal fails.
Jaidev Rajnikant Shroff v. Poonam Jaidev Shroff
The Supreme Court upheld the status quo restraining the wife from residing in the matrimonial home, clarified the scope of 'similar' accommodation, rejected enhanced maintenance claims, and directed expeditious disposal of the pending divorce petition.
Vikramjit Kakati v. State of Assam
The Supreme Court held that in absence of prima facie material connecting the appellant to the alleged murder, charges framed against him were unsustainable and ordered his discharge.