Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited v. M/s United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath · 2021 INSC 856

The Supreme Court held that an insurer's failure to file a written statement within the statutory period bars it from filing later, and a complainant cannot be compelled to amend the complaint, setting aside the NCDRC order permitting such amendment and late filing.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13(1) written statement time limit

M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited v. M/s United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr

09 Dec 2021 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath
Cites 0 · Cited by 15

The Supreme Court held that a consumer forum cannot compel a complainant to amend the complaint to allow a respondent to file a belated written statement, affirming the mandatory nature of the statutory time limit for filing written statements under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 13(1) written statement time limit

Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for triple murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment after emphasizing the need to consider the criminal's potential for reformation before imposing capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty rarest of rare ocular evidence reformation and rehabilitation

Jasbir Singh @ Jassa v. State of Punjab

09 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging unexplained delay in mercy petition disposal are independent proceedings allowing Letters Patent Appeals, and undue delay can justify commutation of death sentence under Article 21.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence mercy petition delay in disposal commutation

Bhagchandra v. State of Madhya Pradesh

09 Dec 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for triple murder but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment after emphasizing the need to consider mitigating factors and the possibility of reformation before awarding capital punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death penalty ocular evidence mitigating circumstances reformation and rehabilitation

K.S. Ranganatha v. Vittal Shetty

08 Dec 2021 · N.V. Ramana; A.S. Bopanna; Hima Kohli
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the appellant failed to rebut the statutory presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legally recoverable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Cheque dishonour Presumption under Section 139

Director of Indian System of Medicine & Anr. v. Dr. Susmi C.T. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi · 2021 INSC 839

The Supreme Court held that the Department had reported all valid vacancies and promotions did not create automatic vacancies, setting aside the Tribunal and High Court orders directing additional vacancy reporting.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant vacancies reporting Kerala Public Service Commission ranked list validity promotions and vacancies

Director of Indian System of Medicine & Anr. v. Dr. Susmi C.T. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that only actual and reported vacancies during the currency of a ranked list confer a right to appointment, setting aside tribunal and High Court orders directing reporting of unsubstantiated vacancies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant vacancies reporting Kerala Public Service Commission Rules ranked list validity promotion and vacancies

Rasmita Biswal & Ors. v. Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the Pranay Sethi principles on future prospects and directed the insurer to pay the balance amount, emphasizing the need for reasoned appellate orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation motor accident claim loss of dependency

Sandeep v. State of Haryana

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, upholding the conviction and sentence against the petitioner Sandeep, finding no error apparent on record.

criminal petition_dismissed Review Petition Conviction Sentence Benefit of doubt

Pottayil Radha v. State of Kerala and Anr.

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging the reduction of sentence and compensation order, holding no error apparent to justify interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Review Petition Reduction of sentence Compensation Error apparent

Shri Kshetrimayum Biren Singh v. The Hon’ble Speaker

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court set aside disqualification orders against MLAs passed solely on newspaper reports without evidence or fair hearing, remanding the cases for fresh adjudication in accordance with natural justice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Tenth Schedule Disqualification of MLA Voluntarily giving up membership Natural justice

Shri Kshetrimayum Biren Singh v. The Hon’ble Speaker

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Bela M. Trivedi

The Supreme Court held that newspaper reports alone cannot prove voluntary giving up of party membership for disqualification under the Tenth Schedule and set aside the Speaker's order for lack of procedural fairness, directing a fresh hearing with opportunity for evidence.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant disqualification Tenth Schedule voluntarily giving up membership natural justice

Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Gajadhar Nath

08 Dec 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the employer's disciplinary action dismissing a conductor for misconduct, holding that the Tribunal erred in setting aside the removal order despite credible evidence and a defective domestic inquiry.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic inquiry industrial dispute misconduct Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' writ petitions challenging land allotment by BDA due to suppression of prior litigation and upheld the validity of the entire land acquisition including kharab-B land.

property appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 suppression of material facts land acquisition

Shri K. Jayaram & Ors. v. Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.

08 Dec 2021 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Krishna Murari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' writ petitions challenging land allotment by BDA due to suppression of prior litigation and upheld the validity of the land acquisition and allotment.

property appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 suppression of facts land acquisition

Kuljit Singh v. The State of Punjab

08 Dec 2021 · N.V. Ramana; A.S. Bopanna; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the husband's conviction for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC but acquitted the mother-in-law due to lack of specific evidence implicating her.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304-B IPC dowry death cruelty harassment

Dinesh Kumar v. U.P Awas Evam Vikash Parishad

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 847

The Supreme Court dismissed Review Petitions challenging the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, upholding Rs.120 per square yard as the correct measure and rejecting the High Court's valuation.

civil petition_dismissed compensation land acquisition market value Reference Court

Dinesh Kumar v. U.P Awas Evam Vikash Parishad

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court dismissed Review Petitions challenging the compensation rate fixed by the Reference Court, affirming that no error apparent on record justified interference.

civil petition_dismissed compensation land acquisition market value Reference Court

SRI LANKAPPA & ORS v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION & ORS

08 Dec 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2021 INSC 841

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit claiming title and possession is barred by res judicata where the issue was finally adjudicated in earlier suits, and upheld the trial court's rejection of KIC's plaint on maintainability grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Order II Rule 2 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC title and possession