Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Jogi Ram v. Suresh Kumar & Ors.

01 Feb 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a limited life estate granted under a Will does not mature into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, and prior decrees adjudicating such limited rights operate as res judicata, invalidating subsequent alienations.

property appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 14(1) Section 14(2) limited estate

Subhash v. State of Uttar Pradesh

01 Feb 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 127

The Supreme Court acquitted two accused in a murder case due to material contradictions in eyewitness testimony and inconsistencies with medical evidence, granting them the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC eyewitness contradictions

Subhash v. State of Uttar Pradesh

01 Feb 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court acquitted two accused due to material contradictions in eyewitness evidence and inconsistencies with medical reports, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness testimony material contradictions benefit of doubt postmortem evidence

The State of Sikkim v. Jasbir Singh

01 Feb 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant · 2022 INSC 128

The Supreme Court held that where both court-martial and criminal court have jurisdiction, the Commanding Officer's discretion under Section 125 of the Army Act to decide the forum of trial must be exercised after charge-sheet filing, and effective exercise of such discretion by handing over the accused to police validates trial by criminal court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Army Act 1950 court-martial concurrent jurisdiction Section 125 Army Act

The State of Sikkim v. Jasbir Singh & Anr.

01 Feb 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that where both court-martial and criminal courts have jurisdiction, the Commanding Officer's discretion under Section 125 of the Army Act to choose the forum must be exercised after charge-sheet filing, and the trial by criminal court is valid if procedural requirements are met.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Army Act, 1950 court-martial concurrent jurisdiction Section 125 Army Act

Vasudev v. State of M.P.

01 Feb 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of attempt to murder and illegal arms use charges due to lack of evidence proving intention and weapon use, allowing the appeal in part.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Arms Act attempt to murder intention and knowledge

Vasudev v. State of M.P.

01 Feb 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of attempt to murder and illegal arms use charges due to lack of proof of intention and weapon use, while upholding lesser arms possession conviction already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Arms Act attempt to murder intention and knowledge

The State of Manipur v. Surjakumar Okram

01 Feb 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the repeal of the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, struck down the saving clause preserving acts under it, but saved acts done during the valid tenure of Parliamentary Secretaries to prevent public inconvenience.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Legislative competence Parliamentary Secretary Saving clause Repealing Act

State of Manipur v. Surjakumar Okram

01 Feb 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the repeal of the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, struck down the saving clause preserving acts under the unconstitutional Act, but saved past acts to prevent injustice.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Legislative competence Parliamentary Secretary Repealing Act Saving clause

M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited v. Manik Sethi

31 Jan 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that where limitation depends on disputed facts, it cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be tried with evidence, allowing the appeal and remanding the suit for trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation Order XIV Rule 2 CPC preliminary issue loan transaction

M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited v. Manik Sethi

31 Jan 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that disputed factual questions regarding limitation cannot be decided as a preliminary issue and must be tried with evidence, allowing the appeal and setting aside dismissal of the suit on limitation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation preliminary issue Order XIV Rule 2 CPC loan transaction

Pappu Tiwary v. State of Jharkhand; Law Tiwari @ Upendra Kumar Tiwari v. State of Jharkhand

31 Jan 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of appellants in a murder case, rejecting the plea of alibi and challenges to the FIR and medical evidence, affirming the principle that the burden of proving alibi lies heavily on the accused and concurrent findings of fact should not be disturbed without compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant alibi plea FIR ante-timing inquest report post-mortem report

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele

31 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court modified the order of reinstatement with back wages for a contractual employee terminated unlawfully, awarding lump sum compensation instead.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act Section 25-F Section 25-G contractual employment

National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited v. Montecarlo Limited

31 Jan 2022 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that judicial interference in foreign sovereign funded tender processes is limited and upheld the rejection of a bid for non-compliance with essential conditions imposed by the funding agency.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Sovereign Funded Contract JICA Tender Process Technical Bid Evaluation

Kerala Transport Development Finance Corporation Limited v. Basil T K & Ors

31 Jan 2022 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court upheld retrospective continuity of service for illegally terminated employees for seniority and promotion purposes, denying only arrears of salary, thereby affirming parity and fairness under service rules.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant continuity of service retrospective regularization seniority promotion

UNITED BANK OF INDIA v. BISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE

31 Jan 2022 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a bank employee's dismissal for misconduct due to lack of evidence and procedural unfairness in the departmental enquiry.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry judicial review Article 226 disciplinary proceedings

UNITED BANK OF INDIA v. BISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE

31 Jan 2022 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a bank employee's dismissal for misconduct due to lack of evidence and procedural unfairness in the departmental enquiry.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry judicial review Article 226 no evidence

Madhukar Kamble & Ors. v. Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation & Ors.

31 Jan 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's enhanced compensation for land acquisition, holding that market value must consider proximity to developed areas and that the High Court erred in setting aside the valuation based on sale exemplars.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value compensation sale exemplars

Pappu Tiwary v. State of Jharkhand; Law Tiwari @ Upendra Kumar Tiwari v. State of Jharkhand

31 Jan 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M.M. Sundresh
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions of appellants for murder, rejecting the plea of alibi and allegations of procedural irregularities, affirming the reliability of postmortem and eyewitness evidence over inquest discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant alibi FIR ante-timed FIR inquest report

T.P. Gopalakrishnan v. State of Kerala

30 Jan 2022 · B. R. Gavai; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court quashed the appellant's subsequent convictions for misappropriation on grounds of double jeopardy and lack of State Government consent, holding that retrial for the same offence is barred under Article 20(2) and Section 300 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Section 300 CrPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988