Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Sanjay Kumar Mishra & Ors. v. District Judge, Ambedkar Nagar (U.P.)

17 Oct 2025 · B. R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN

The Supreme Court held that appointments made beyond initially advertised vacancies pursuant to a waiting list within a reasonable period are valid and quashed the termination of Class IV employees made on the ground of excess appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rule 12 waiting list Class IV appointments excess vacancies

State of Rajasthan and Ors. v. Anisur Rahman

17 Oct 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether allopathy and AYUSH doctors should be treated equally in service conditions, permitting interim continuance of AYUSH doctors beyond retirement age with half pay.

administrative other Significant retirement age allopathy doctors AYUSH doctors service conditions

Rajendra Bihari Lal and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

17 Oct 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1249

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of FIRs under the U.P. Conversion Act and IPC, dismissed petitions seeking their quashing, and clarified the limited scope of quashing powers post chargesheet.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 Section 4 U.P. Conversion Act multiplicity of FIRs

Leelavathi N. and Ors. v. The State of Karnataka and Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1242

The Supreme Court held that writ petitions challenging recruitment eligibility must be adjudicated by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, not the High Court, affirming the exclusive jurisdiction of tribunals in service matters and the rule of alternate remedy.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Article 226 Constitution of India writ jurisdiction alternate remedy

Legislative Council U.P. Lucknow v. Sushil Kumar

16 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1241
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's suo motu direction for CBI enquiry into recruitment irregularities, holding that such extraordinary powers require sufficient prima facie material and cannot be exercised routinely or without party prayers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Public Interest Litigation recruitment process Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council

Zoharbee & Anr. v. Imam Khan

16 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1245

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell does not transfer ownership and property not conveyed by registered sale deed at the deceased's death forms part of matruka property distributable among heirs under Mohammedan law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell Matruka property Mohammedan law inheritance Transfer of Property Act Section 54

The Union of India & Ors. v. Subit Kumar Das

15 Oct 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1235

The Supreme Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no vested right to appointment after all selected candidates join and that a prior concession cannot override statutory Recruitment Rules, setting aside the High Court's direction to absorb the respondent.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant waitlist reserved panel recruitment rules concession before tribunal

Karam Singh v. Amarjit Singh

15 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 1238
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds unless ex facie barred, and allowed the appeal restoring the suit for possession and declaration of title filed within limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 11 CPC limitation mutation possession based on title

Manorma Sinha & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Anr.

15 Oct 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 1237
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including allowances in income, calculating income tax deduction based on actual liability, and applying 50% future prospects for a deceased permanent employee under 40 years.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act compensation loss of dependency allowances

Pradyumna Mukund Kokil v. Nashik Municipal Corporation

15 Oct 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1236
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored enhanced compensation for land acquisition based on statutory sale instances, denied rental compensation for pre-purchase period, but granted interest as mesne profits post-purchase, clarifying valuation and compensation principles under the 2013 Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition market value compensation rental compensation

M/S KHURANA BROTHERS v. ANAND BARDHAN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ANR.

14 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1240
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of an intra court appeal restores the original order and contempt jurisdiction lies before the High Court, not this Court.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition doctrine of merger intra court appeal withdrawal of appeal

The Assam Financial Corporation Limited v. Bhabendra Nath Sarma

14 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Vijay Bishnoi · 2025 INSC 1264

The Supreme Court held that employees of Assam Financial Corporation are entitled to gratuity at the higher ceiling notified by the State Government under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, overriding AFC's lower internal ceiling.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 gratuity ceiling Assam Financial Corporation State Government employees

Komal Prasad Shakya v. Rajendra Singh

14 Oct 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; K. V. Viswanathan

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashment of criminal proceedings against accused for fraudulently obtaining a Scheduled Caste certificate, holding that a prima facie case exists and the trial must proceed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste certificate Forgery Cheating Criminal conspiracy

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Janved Singh

14 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Alok Aradhe · 2025 INSC 1229

The Supreme Court reinstated the murder conviction of the father-in-law for dowry-related homicidal death, emphasizing the strength of circumstantial evidence and false explanation by the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry harassment homicidal death circumstantial evidence false explanation

Alan Mervyn Arthur Stephenson v. J. Xavier Jayarajan

14 Oct 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1228

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act as the claim was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration limitation Section 11(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 partnership dispute

Reshma v. Dajiba Krishna Lad & Anr.

14 Oct 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1320
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a severely disabled motor accident victim, emphasizing just and adequate relief including attendant charges and marriage prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicle accident compensation permanent disability future prospects

Varun Kumar Alias Sonu v. State of Himachal Pradesh

14 Oct 2025 · Manoj Misra; Vipul M. Pancholi · 2025 INSC 1232
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a minor, affirming that credible victim testimony and supportive medical evidence justify setting aside a trial court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant minor consent immaterial sexual offences rape medical evidence

Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam v. P.H. Dinesh & Ors.

13 Oct 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; N.V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1224

The Supreme Court transferred the Karur stampede investigation to the CBI, set up a supervisory committee, and clarified procedural propriety regarding writ petitions on investigation and SOP formation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Karur stampede CBI investigation Special Investigation Team Standard Operating Procedure

Rahul Agarwal v. The State of West Bengal

13 Oct 2025 · B. R. GAVAI; K. VINOD CHANDRAN · 2025 INSC 1223
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that Magistrates have the power to order voice samples from any person without violating the right against self-incrimination under Article 20(3), allowing the appeal and restoring the Magistrate's order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant voice sample self-incrimination Article 20(3) Criminal Procedure Code

KACHARA VAHATUK SHARAMIK SANGH v. AJOY MEHTA & ORS.

13 Oct 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1227

The Supreme Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai to comply with its 2017 order regularizing employees by appointing an auditor to verify dues and ensuring timely payment, while leaving Provident Fund disputes to the Bombay High Court.

labor petition_allowed Significant contempt petition regularization of employees retrospective benefits wage fixation