Supreme Court of India

16,362 judgments

Year:

The State of Uttarakhand v. Sachendra Singh Rawat

04 Feb 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction and life sentence of the accused, holding that multiple grievous injuries inflicted with a weapon after a prior quarrel do not fall under the Fourth exception to Section 300 IPC and constitute murder under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 300 IPC culpable homicide murder

Ajanta LLP v. Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a Casio Computer Co. Ltd

04 Feb 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a consent decree cannot be modified on grounds of mere typographical error or misunderstanding absent fraud, misrepresentation, or patent mistake, and dismissed the appeal seeking such modification.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree modification of decree Order 23 Rule 3 CPC Section 151 CPC

Ajanta LLP v. Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha d/b/a Casio Computer Co. Ltd

04 Feb 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a consent decree cannot be modified on the ground of an alleged typographical error or misunderstanding absent fraud, misrepresentation, or patent mistake, and dismissed the appeal seeking such modification.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree settlement agreement modification Order 23 Rule 3 CPC

WALCHANDNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

04 Feb 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court restored compensation for injurious affection to rails and sleepers rendered useless by partial land acquisition, while upholding rejection of claims for rolling stock and increased transportation costs due to lack of proven loss.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation injurious affection severance

WALCHANDNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

04 Feb 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored compensation for injurious affection to rails and sleepers rendered useless by partial land acquisition, while upholding rejection of claims for rolling stock and increased transportation costs due to lack of proven loss.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 23(1) injurious affection severance

M/s Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/s Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited

04 Feb 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court held that an operational creditor includes a person owed operational debt irrespective of supply direction, and a corporate debtor’s MOA takeover clause establishes succession liability, allowing initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant operational creditor operational debt Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 9 IBC

IndusInd Bank Limited and Another v. Simarjit Singh

03 Feb 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court held that forcible repossession of a truck without default constitutes deficiency in service and remitted the issue of timber valuation for fresh adjudication while upholding compensation and truck value awards.

consumer appeal_allowed Significant loan default repossession deficiency in service consumer protection

Suryavir v. State of Haryana

03 Feb 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant and co-accused due to failure of prosecution to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt and extended benefit of acquittal to both despite earlier dismissal of one co-accused's petition.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identity of accused reasonable doubt test identification parade benefit of doubt

Suryavir v. State of Haryana

03 Feb 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant and co-accused in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt and extended parity relief despite prior dismissal of co-accused's appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identity of accused reasonable doubt test identification parade in-court identification

Union of India v. Krishna Modi

03 Feb 2022 · Vineet Saran; Aniruddha Bose · 2022 INSC 144
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the Union of India's appeal, holding that the respondent did not fulfill the strict eligibility criteria under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980, and set aside the High Court's order granting pension.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 freedom fighter pension eligibility criteria underground period

Union of India v. Krishna Modi

03 Feb 2022 · Vineet Saran; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that strict compliance with eligibility criteria under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 is mandatory and set aside the High Court’s grant of pension to a claimant lacking requisite proof and State Government recommendation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 freedom fighter pension underground activity Non-availability of Record Certificate

Rekha Jain and Minakshi Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Feb 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 141

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants who were bona fide purchasers of property alleged to be attached, holding no prima facie case existed against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings bona fide purchaser attached property

Rekha Jain and Minakshi Jain v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Feb 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants who were bona fide purchasers of property not under attachment at the time of purchase, holding no prima facie case was made out against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings bona fide purchaser attachment of property

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Yunus & Ors.

03 Feb 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2021 SCC OnLine Bom 917
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a Lok Adalat Award under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 is not an adjudicatory award by a Court under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and cannot form the basis for compensation redetermination under Section 28A.

property appeal_allowed Significant Lok Adalat Award Section 28A Land Acquisition Act Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 Compensation redetermination

N. Rajendran v. S. Valli

03 Feb 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of divorce on cruelty grounds, held the respondent's appeal timely, declared the appellant's second marriage unlawful, and dissolved the marriage under Article 142 on irretrievable breakdown.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act Family Courts Act Limitation Act Section 13(1)(ia)

N. Rajendran v. S. Valli

03 Feb 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of divorce on cruelty grounds, held the appeal was timely, declared the appellant's second marriage unlawful, and dissolved the marriage under Article 142 due to irretrievable breakdown.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act Family Courts Act Limitation Act Section 13(1)(ia)

IndusInd Bank Limited and Another v. Simarjit Singh

03 Feb 2022 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Sanjiv Khanna · 2022 INSC 143

The Supreme Court held that forcible repossession without default is impermissible and remitted the disputed timber valuation for fresh adjudication while upholding compensation and truck value payments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan default repossession consumer dispute valuation of goods

Mohammed Masroor Shaikh v. Bharat Bhushan Gupta & Ors.

02 Feb 2022 · Indira Banerjee; Abhay S. Oka · 2022 INSC 138

The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court's appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11, affirming limited judicial review and leaving arbitrability and limitation issues to arbitration or Section 34 proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition appointment of arbitrator scope of judicial review

Mohammed Masroor Shaikh v. Bharat Bhushan Gupta & Ors.

02 Feb 2022 · Indira Banerjee; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11, affirming limited judicial review and leaving arbitrability and limitation issues to the arbitral tribunal and pending Section 34 challenges.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Appointment of arbitrator Scope of judicial review

The State of Rajasthan & Anr. v. Anju Rini Saini

02 Feb 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that a candidate lacking the required qualification by the prescribed deadline is ineligible for appointment despite later acquisition, and Rule 266-A does not apply absent prior appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules 1996 Rule 266-A RSCIT qualification public employment eligibility