Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

M/s Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rambha Devi

08 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court deferred the final interpretation of whether a light motor vehicle licence permits driving transport vehicles without separate endorsement, directing the Union Government to evaluate policy implications before further judicial consideration.

administrative other Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 light motor vehicle transport vehicle driving licence

SRI ABHYUDAYA KUMAR SHAHI v. M/S. BHARAT PRADHAN FILLING CENTRE

07 Mar 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 269

The Supreme Court held that an appeal must be decided by the current appellate authority as per amended guidelines, setting aside a High Court order directing consideration by a non-existent forum and closing related contempt proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appeal forum Dispute Resolution Panel Marketing Discipline Guidelines, 2012 pre-deposit

SRI ABHYUDAYA KUMAR SHAHI v. M/S. BHARAT PRADHAN FILLING CENTRE

07 Mar 2022 · DINESH MAHESHWARI; VIKRAM NATH

The Supreme Court held that an appeal must be decided by the current appellate authority under amended guidelines, setting aside a High Court order directing consideration by a now non-existent forum and quashing related contempt proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appeal dispute resolution panel pre-deposit contempt proceedings

DHEERAJ BHADVIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

07 Mar 2022 · UDAY UMESH LALIT; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a Section 306 IPC case, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and imposing bail conditions to balance justice and inquiry.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 306 IPC Section 438 CrPC abetment of suicide

DHEERAJ BHADVIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

07 Mar 2022 · UDAY UMESH LALIT; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail to the appellant in a Section 306 IPC case, setting aside the High Court's rejection and imposing conditions of security and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) v. M/s. MOTISONS ENTERTAINMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2022 INSC 273

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's summary dismissal of the Revenue's income tax appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits regarding additions under Section 56(1).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Appeal Section 56(1) Income Tax Act Addition to income Assessment Year 2012-13

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) v. M/s. MOTISONS ENTERTAINMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's brief dismissal of the Revenue's appeal regarding unexplained income addition under Section 56(1) and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Appeal Section 56(1) Income Tax Act Addition to income Assessment Year 2012-13

State of Odisha v. Samal Barrage Employees’ Union

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2022 INSC 267

The Supreme Court set aside contempt proceedings against State officials for non-compliance of regularization directions due to lack of notice and rejection of the claim on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court notice regularization writ petition

State of Odisha v. Samal Barrage Employees’ Union

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that contempt proceedings cannot be sustained without notice to official respondents and set aside the High Court's contempt order, allowing the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Court Natural Justice Notice Regularization

PANI RAM v. UNION OF INDIA

07 Mar 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI

The Supreme Court allowed substitution of the deceased appellant's legal representatives and corrected the advocate's name in the judgment to ensure proper continuation of the civil appeal.

civil other substitution of legal representatives deceased appellant correction of judgment clerical error

Tedhi Singh v. Narayan Dass Mahant

07 Mar 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 0 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but modified the sentence from imprisonment to fine and additional compensation, holding that the appellant failed to raise a sufficient probable defense to rebut the statutory presumption.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 Negotiable Instruments Act probable defense rebuttable presumption

Abhishek Kumar v. State of Delhi

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail to the appellant accused of serious offences, setting aside the High Court's rejection, subject to conditions including security and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC Indian Penal Code Sections 376, 328, 506, 313 cooperation with investigation

Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.

07 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in serious criminal offences subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with the investigation, setting aside the High Court's rejection.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC cooperation with investigation serious offences

Raza Ahmad v. State of Chhattisgarh

07 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that challenges to Environmental Clearances granted before the NGT Act are barred by limitation but remitted the matter to the NGT to decide on the jurisdiction and condonation of delay regarding the land use change notification.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 limitation land use change

Raza Ahmad v. State of Chhattisgarh

07 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that the challenge to a pre-NGT Act Environmental Clearance is barred by limitation but remitted the challenge to a land use modification notification to the NGT for consideration of jurisdiction and condonation of delay.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 limitation land use modification

M. Nageswara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh; The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kasireddy Ramakrishna Reddy

07 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 266

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction and life sentence of accused persons for murder, holding that minor FIR delay and witness interest do not vitiate credible eyewitness evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR delay eyewitness testimony injured eyewitness interpolation in FIR

M. Nageswara Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh; The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kasireddy Ramakrishna Reddy

07 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's conviction of Accused Nos. 1 to 3 for murder under Sections 148 and 302 IPC, holding that minor FIR delays and contradictions do not undermine credible eyewitness and injured witness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR delay eyewitness testimony injured eyewitness interpolation in FIR

Amritlal v. Shantilal Soni

06 Mar 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 243

The Supreme Court held that for limitation under Section 468 CrPC, the relevant date is the complaint filing date, not the date of cognizance, and set aside the High Court's order quashing prosecution on limitation grounds.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant limitation Section 468 CrPC date of filing complaint date of cognizance

Abdul Vahab v. State of Madhya Pradesh

04 Mar 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that confiscation of a vehicle under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act after acquittal in criminal prosecution is arbitrary and violative of constitutional rights, and the High Court has jurisdiction to quash such confiscation orders.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confiscation order M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 Section 482 CrPC Article 300A Constitution

Abdul Vahab v. State of Madhya Pradesh

04 Mar 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court held that confiscation of a vehicle under the M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 cannot be sustained after acquittal in criminal prosecution, affirming the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC and protecting property rights under Article 300A.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant confiscation order M.P. Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 2004 Section 482 CrPC jurisdiction Article 300A Constitution of India