Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Abhay Jain v. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and Anr.

15 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that discharge of a judicial officer probationer after initiation of departmental inquiry without a proper inquiry violates Article 311(2) and set aside the discharge order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant probationer discharge Article 311(2) Constitution departmental inquiry judicial officer discharge

Abhay Jain v. High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and Anr.

15 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that discharge of a judicial officer probationer following departmental enquiry without a proper inquiry and opportunity to be heard violates Article 311(2) of the Constitution and quashed the discharge order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant probationer discharge Article 311(2) Constitution departmental enquiry judicial officer discharge

Local Self Government Department v. K. Chandran

15 Mar 2022 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held that the Government can withhold Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity pending conclusion of criminal appeals and departmental proceedings initiated during service under the Kerala Service Rules.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity Kerala Service Rules Rule 3A withholding gratuity

Sri Biswanath Banik v. Sulanga Bose

14 Mar 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds without considering the entire plaint and that a suit under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act is maintainable against the owner, allowing the appeal and restoring the trial court's order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 53A Transfer of Property Act limitation declaration suit

SHYAM SEL AND POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER v. SHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

14 Mar 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI

The Supreme Court held that an order granting time to file affidavit and postponing injunction hearing is not a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, rendering the intra-court appeal non-maintainable and set aside the Division Bench's injunction order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters Patent Clause 15 judgment definition interlocutory order

SHYAM SEL AND POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER v. SHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

14 Mar 2022 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; B.R. GAVAI
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an order granting time to file affidavit and adjourning injunction hearing is not a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, rendering the intra-court appeal non-maintainable and set aside the Division Bench's injunction order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters Patent Clause 15 judgment definition interlocutory order

High Court of Delhi v. Devina Sharma

14 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of age limits for Delhi judicial service recruitment while granting a one-time relaxation to candidates affected by pandemic-related delays in examinations.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Judicial Service Delhi Higher Judicial Service age limit minimum age

High Court of Delhi v. Devina Sharma

14 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; A S Bopanna; Hima Kohli

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of minimum and maximum age limits for Delhi judicial service examinations and granted one-time age relaxation to candidates affected by examination delays due to procedural and pandemic reasons.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Judicial Service Rules Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules age limit minimum age requirement

Shobha & Ors. v. The Chairman, Vithalrao Shinde

11 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that interest on compensation under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 is payable from the date the compensation falls due, i.e., the date of the accident, and not from the date of the Commissioner’s order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A(3)(a) interest on compensation penalty for default

Kamla Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr

11 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic bail orders in a murder case, emphasizing the need for reasoned bail decisions considering the gravity of offences and risks posed by the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Kamla Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr

11 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic bail orders in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned bail decisions considering the gravity of offences and risk of interference with justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Dharmesh S. Jain

10 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held the respondents guilty of civil contempt for wilful disobedience of its and the High Court's orders to deposit 50% of the arbitral award amount, rejecting their defense that execution proceedings were the sole remedy.

civil conviction_upheld Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Arbitral Award Specific Performance Section 34 Arbitration Act

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Dharmesh S. Jain

10 Mar 2022 · M.R. Shah; B.V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with its clear deposit order in arbitration proceedings constitutes wilful disobedience amounting to civil contempt, and the respondents are liable for punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

civil conviction_upheld Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 36 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

M. KENDRA DEVI v. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

10 Mar 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2022 INSC 288

The Supreme Court upheld the seniority of compassionate appointees over direct recruits in Tamil Nadu Assistant Engineer cadre despite irregular compassionate appointments to Class II posts post-1994, emphasizing humanitarian considerations and long service tenure.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment seniority direct recruitment Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

M. KENDRA DEVI v. THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU

10 Mar 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the seniority of compassionate appointees as Assistant Engineers over direct recruits despite such appointments being contrary to binding precedent, due to their long service and regularization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment seniority direct recruitment Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

State of Rajasthan v. Ashok Khetoliya

10 Mar 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's notification constituting a Municipal Board under the Rajasthan Municipalities Act is valid without a separate constitutional notification under Article 243Q(2), setting aside the High Court's quashing of the notification.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Municipal Board Article 243Q Seventy-Fourth Amendment Rajasthan Municipalities Act

State of Rajasthan v. Ashok Khetoliya

10 Mar 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a State Government notification constituting a Municipal Board without a prior constitutional notification under Article 243Q(2), affirming the State's legislative competence under Part IXA of the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Municipal Board Article 243Q Part IXA Constitution Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009

SK Nausad Rahaman & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

10 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath · 2022 INSC 287
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 2018 circular prohibiting Inter-Commissionerate Transfers under the Recruitment Rules 2016, holding that executive instructions cannot override statutory recruitment rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Inter-Commissionerate Transfers Recruitment Rules 2016 Cadre Controlling Authority Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

SK Nausad Rahaman v. Union of India

10 Mar 2022 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Vikram Nath
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the CBIC circular withdrawing Inter-Commissionerate Transfers under Recruitment Rules 2016, holding that statutory rules prevail over executive instructions and no fundamental right to such transfers exists.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Inter-Commissionerate Transfers Recruitment Rules 2016 Cadre Controlling Authority Article 309 of Constitution

Sagar v. State of U.P. and Another

10 Mar 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2022 INSC 295

The Supreme Court held that the power to summon an accused under Section 319 CrPC is discretionary and extraordinary, requiring strong evidence, and set aside the High Court's order summoning the appellant, restoring the trial court's rejection of the application.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning of accused discretionary power strong and cogent evidence