Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Saranpal Kaur Anand v. Praduman Singh Chandhok

28 Mar 2022 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a suit as barred by limitation under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, holding that mere allegations of fraud without particulars and reasonable diligence do not exempt the suit from limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC fraud Section 17 Limitation Act

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Circle 1(2) v. M/S. M. R. Shah Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reopening of income tax assessment requires tangible material and that immunity under the Income Declaration Scheme applies only to declarants, not to non-declarant assessees benefiting from accommodation entries.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Income Declaration Scheme 2016

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Circle 1(2) v. M/S. M. R. Shah Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reopening of income tax assessment under Sections 147/148 is valid if based on tangible material and that immunity under the Income Declaration Scheme applies only to the declarant, not to non-declarants like the assessee.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Income Declaration Scheme 2016

Vishal Ashwin Patel v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

28 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's non-reasoned dismissal of writ petitions challenging reopening of income tax assessments under Section 148 and remanded for fresh, reasoned consideration on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reopening of assessment writ petition Article 226 Constitution

Mafat Lal & Anr v. State of Rajasthan

28 Mar 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and proceedings under Sections 363 and 366 IPC where the minor female voluntarily left home and married the appellant, holding no offence was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR kidnapping abduction

Mafat Lal & Anr v. State of Rajasthan

28 Mar 2022 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Vikram Nath

The Supreme Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 363 and 366 IPC where the abductee voluntarily left home as a minor, married the appellant, and lived happily, holding no offence was made out.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 363 IPC Section 366 IPC quashing of FIR

Narinder Garg & Others v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Others

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi... · 2022 INSC 355

The Supreme Court held that moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects only the corporate debtor and does not bar criminal proceedings against directors under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Narinder Garg & Others v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. & Others

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects only the corporate debtor and does not bar criminal proceedings under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against directors, and acceptance of a Resolution Plan does not quash such proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

Sanchit Alagh & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi... · 2022 INSC 354

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of multiple FIR investigations to the CBI and anticipatory bail, holding that ongoing lawful investigations should not be interfered with without compelling reasons.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 32 Constitution of India anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC transfer of investigation

SANCHIT ALAGH & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

28 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of multiple investigations to the CBI and anticipatory bail, holding that ongoing investigations by competent authorities do not warrant judicial interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 32 Constitution of India anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. transfer of investigation

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. MEGA CORPORATION LIMITED

25 Mar 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court limited its appellate review under Section 15Z of the SEBI Act to questions of law, upheld the Securities Appellate Tribunal's factual findings setting aside SEBI's order against Mega Corporation, and clarified that there is no absolute right to cross-examination in SEBI proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Act, 1992 Section 15Z Securities Appellate Tribunal PFUTP Regulations 2003

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. MEGA CORPORATION LIMITED

25 Mar 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed SEBI's appeal against the Securities Appellate Tribunal's order setting aside SEBI's restraint on Mega Corporation, clarifying the limited scope of appeals under Section 15Z and rejecting a general right to cross-examination in SEBI proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Act 1992 Section 15Z Securities Appellate Tribunal PFUTP Regulations 2003

M/S PAHWA PLASTICS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. v. DASTAK NGO AND ORS.

25 Mar 2022 · Indira Banerjee; J.K. Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that industrial units operating with valid consents and applying for ex post facto environmental clearance should not be closed pending clearance if they comply with pollution norms, balancing environmental protection with livelihood concerns.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Ex post facto clearance Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 EIA Notification 2006

Union of India v. S. Ranjit Samuel

24 Mar 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that employees eligible for financial upgradation after 1st September 2008 are governed by the MACP Scheme, which can be applied retrospectively, and do not have a vested right under the superseded ACP Scheme.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation retrospective application

Union of India v. S. Ranjit Samuel

24 Mar 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that employees eligible for financial upgradation after 1st September 2008 are governed by the MACP Scheme, overruling their claim under the earlier ACP Scheme due to the MACP Scheme's retrospective applicability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme financial upgradation retrospective application

The Sub Registrar Ernakulam Kochi 16 v. K. Syed Ali Kadar Pillai

24 Mar 2022 · Dinesh Maheshwari; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the Company Court's valuation for stamp duty collection in a supervised sale, dismissing the appeal challenging the lower valuation against a higher auction bid.

civil appeal_dismissed Company Court valuation stamp duty auction bid immovable property sale

Dinesh Chandra Shukla v. State of U.P.

24 Mar 2022 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that in absence of specific qualifications for a Lecturer post, the University must determine relevant subjects beforehand and directed regularisation of the appellant's appointment after nearly 16 years of teaching Karm Kand.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant University appointment Lecturer in Karm Kand Relevant subject qualification U.P. State Universities Act, 1973

Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India

24 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 343

The Supreme Court fixed time limits for filing COVID-19 death compensation claims and permitted random scrutiny to prevent fraudulent claims, emphasizing punishment for false claims under the Disaster Management Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant ex-gratia compensation COVID-19 deaths time limit for claims random sample scrutiny

Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India

24 Mar 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court fixed outer time limits for COVID-19 death compensation claims and authorized random scrutiny to prevent fraudulent claims under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant ex-gratia payment COVID-19 death compensation time limit for claims random scrutiny

Sartaj Khan v. State of Uttarakhand

24 Mar 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Pamidighantam Sri Narasi...

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for trafficking a minor girl for exploitation, ruling that partial commission of offence in India negates the need for prior sanction under Section 188 CrPC and affirming the applicability of Section 370(4) IPC based on medical evidence of victim's age.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant human trafficking minor victim Section 370(4) IPC Section 188 CrPC