Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Anil Kumar Upadhyay v. The Director General, SSB

20 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld removal from service of a Head Constable for indiscipline, ruling that judicial interference in disciplinary punishment is limited and disparity in punishment among co-delinquents does not justify reduction absent complete parity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings removal from service proportionality judicial review

Dr. (Mrs.) Chanda Rani Akhouri & Ors. v. Dr. M.A. Methusethupathi & Ors.

20 Apr 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a medical negligence complaint, holding that the treating doctors provided reasonable post-operative care after a kidney transplant and the patient's death was not due to negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence post-operative care kidney transplantation Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994

Dr. (Mrs.) Chanda Rani Akhouri & Ors. v. Dr. M.A. Methusethupathi & Ors.

20 Apr 2022 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a medical negligence complaint, ruling that the treating doctors exercised reasonable skill and care in post-operative treatment following a kidney transplant, and the patient's death did not amount to negligence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence post-operative care kidney transplantation Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994

Sh. Ram Chander (Dead) Thr Lrs v. Union of India

20 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court restored the original compensation award under the Land Acquisition Act by quashing the High Court's review order that recalled its earlier judgment based on a precedent later reaffirmed by the Supreme Court.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation enhancement Review petition Recall of judgment

Sh. Ram Chander (Dead) Thr Lrs v. Union of India

20 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's review order recalling its earlier compensation award, restoring the original compensation enhanced under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, following re-affirmation of the relied-upon precedent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation enhancement review petition precedent set aside and remanded

Shankar Lal v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.

20 Apr 2022 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that an employer cannot unilaterally alter an employee's date of birth recorded in service documents without hearing, and directed VRS benefits be computed based on the consistent date of birth maintained in the service book.

labor appeal_allowed Significant date of birth dispute Voluntary Retirement Scheme Form B register service book

State of Odisha v. Sulekh Chandra Pradhan

20 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal and High Court orders regularizing Hindi Teachers appointed without following statutory rules, holding such appointments void and affirming the legality of their termination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Aided Educational Institutions Appointment procedure Odisha Education Rules 1974 Void ab initio

State of Odisha v. Sulekh Chandra Pradhan

20 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai

The Supreme Court held that appointments of Hindi Teachers made without following statutory rules and beyond sanctioned posts in aided M.E. Schools are void, setting aside their reinstatement orders by the Tribunal and High Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Aided Educational Institutions Appointment procedure Odisha Education Rules 1974 Void ab initio

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Ram Singh

20 Apr 2022 · K. M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy · 2022 INSC 448

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Notification exempting land from acquisition under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the withdrawal of that exemption based on lack of actual possession and procedural irregularities.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Section 48 Land Acquisition Act withdrawal from acquisition actual possession natural justice

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Ram Singh

20 Apr 2022 · K.M. Joseph; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a notification exempting land from acquisition under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that actual possession is necessary to bar withdrawal and that cancellation of such notification based on a prospective government order was unsustainable.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 48 withdrawal from acquisition possession

Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

20 Apr 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that magistrate's cognizance followed by committal to Special Court under the Atrocities Act is valid and criminal proceedings cannot be quashed at inception merely on allegations of political vendetta.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Special Court jurisdiction Malicious prosecution

Ramveer Upadhyay & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

20 Apr 2022 · Indira Banerjee; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court to take cognizance under the Atrocities Act and dismissed the petitioners' plea to quash criminal proceedings initiated on a complaint alleging caste-based abuse, emphasizing that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly and not on mere allegations of political vendetta.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 14 Atrocities Act cognizance

Nagendra v. Ashok

20 Apr 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, affirming the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition and upholding the lower courts' decree for specific performance.

civil petition_dismissed specific performance review petition special leave petition error apparent on record

Hyundai Motor India Limited v. Shailendra Bhatnagar

20 Apr 2022 · Vineet Saran; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld consumer liability and punitive damages against Hyundai for defective airbag deployment in a vehicle accident, affirming reliefs granted by consumer fora under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant airbag deployment consumer protection product defect punitive damages

All India Judges Association v. Union of India

19 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court modified the qualifying service requirement for promotion to Delhi Higher Judicial Service through LDCE from 5 years as Senior Division to 7 years combined service, recognizing Delhi's unique judicial cadre structure.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Higher Judicial Service Limited Departmental Competitive Examination promotion eligibility Civil Judge Senior Division

All India Judges Association v. Union of India

19 Apr 2022 · L. Nageswara Rao; B.R. Gavai; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court modified the qualifying service requirement for promotion to Delhi Higher Judicial Service under LDCE from 5 years as Senior Division judge to 7 years combined service or 10 years Junior Division service, to address practical difficulties and uphold promotion incentives.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Higher Judicial Service Limited Departmental Competitive Examination promotion eligibility Civil Judge Senior Division

Indrajeet Yadav v. Santosh Singh

19 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's acquittal order pronounced without a reasoned judgment and remanded the appeals for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the necessity of prompt and reasoned judgments.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant reasoned judgment operative order judicial discipline delay in judgment

Union of India v. M/s. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

19 Apr 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that interest on delayed IGST refunds under Section 56 of the CGST Act is payable at 6% per annum and set aside the High Court's award of 9% interest.

tax appeal_allowed Significant IGST Act 2017 CGST Act 2017 delayed refund interest on refund

Union of India v. M/s. Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

19 Apr 2022 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court held that interest on delayed GST refunds is payable at the statutory rate of 6% per annum and set aside the High Court's award of 9% interest, affirming the maintainability of writ petitions enforcing statutory rights to interest.

tax appeal_allowed Significant IGST Act 2017 CGST Act 2017 interest on delayed refund Section 56 CGST Act

Ramrao Shankar Tapase v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corpn.

19 Apr 2022 · M. R. Shah; B. V. Nagarathna · 2022 INSC 437

The Supreme Court partly enhanced compensation for land acquired by MIDC in village Bhoyar by applying a 12% cumulative increase to a reliable sale exemplar, affirming that future use cannot solely determine compensation and that different lands in the same village may have different values.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 fair market value